'The Tree': The Story of a Young Culture in an Ancient Landscape

Julie Bertuccelli's touching family drama is heartfelt but not overly sentimental. It follows in the tradition of Australia cinema that contrasts childlike innocence with the power of nature.

The Tree

Director: Julie Bertuccelli
Cast: Charlotte Gainsbourg, Morgana Davies
Distributor: Artificial Eye (UK)
Rated: PG 12
UK Release date: 2011-10-10
Official website

What if your dad died suddenly and then his spirit came back and inhabited the tree that grew by your house? This is what happens to eight-year-old Simone (Morgana Davies) in Julie Bertuccelli’s touching family drama The Tree. The grieving little girl gains comfort from her belief that her father is not gone, just dislocated somehow and talking to her through the sound of the wind in the branches.

This film is undoubtedly full of heartfelt sentiment, but it does not wallow in misery. On the contrary the young family, led by their mother Dawn (Charlotte Gainsbourg), find the positive in the fallout from their bereavement.

Based on Australian writer Judy Pascoe’s 2002 novel Our Father Who Art in the Tree, this bears all the hallmarks of ‘coming-of-age’ and self discovery drama, but in this case has magic realism as an added ingredient. We are never sure whether Simone’s voices are real or not; this is left ambiguous and intriguing. When the tree seems to turn nasty and its fallen branches cut a gash across the side of the wooden house, crushing the marital bed of the widowed Dawn, it makes us think that there might be something to this possession idea. We had previously seen Dawn experience her first joy in the year since her husband’s death when, after a couple of beers, she kissed her new boss, George the plumber (Marton Csokas).

The family inhabit a plot of land in the Queensland countryside, with only a small town nearby. They have a simple, pioneer-type lifestyle belonging to a different era. This is reinforced with the panoramic shots of the landscape and the journey that the father takes at the beginning transporting a wooden house across country. The story has a stripped down feel to it therefore, focussing on the intimate lives of the family within the landscape and alongside nature.

Their grief is played out in a dry-eyed, non-hysterical fashion. Not what we have come to expect in many ways of contemporary film-making. Charlie, the youngest child, just stops speaking – a much more accurate psychological portrayal of a child who has encountered such an event very early on in life. Bertuccelli’s style is developed from documentary making and also working as assistant director to such names as Krystof Kieslowski. She shows off a crispness of style and use of images that supports the narrative and insists upon ambiguity and questions.

When the forces of nature take over and seem to threaten the family, their vulnerability is on show and the fragile figure of Gainsbourg as the mother takes on a more complex and powerful symbolism as she strives to keep her children safe. This enables the film to sit well alongside other Australia-based narratives that witness childhood innocence within a powerful, potentially threatening and mystical situation, such as Nicolas Roeg’s Walkabout (1971) and Peter Weir’s Picnic At Hanging Rock (1975). These are part of the pioneer story-telling tradition of a young culture in an ancient landscape.

The image of the child Simone in the branches of the huge tree, which she has decorated with little totemic symbols of her father, has a spiritual and dramatic quality and makes for a suitable emblem for this juxtaposition. It sums up how people navigate the new and the strange, and come to understand their place within the world.

By staying clear of any sweetness and sticking with a naturalistic, unaffected style, Bertucelli gets the best from her young cast members. This is explored fully in the ‘making of’ documentary on the extras; which is also an amusing exposé of the international collaborative film-making process as Australian crew members come to terms with their French co-producers.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.