Decision 2012 By Way of a Sense of Place

Brett Mobley

BOOM! Studios' release of Decision 2012 read through the political and economic realities of life in the Bronx. Life has been complex here these last few years, Decision 2012: Barack Obama should be as well.

Decision 2012: Barack Obama

Publisher: BOOM! Studios
Length: 22 pages
Writer: Damian Coucerio (artist)
Price: $3.99
Publication Date: 2012-11

“Barack Obama #1” is the first issue of a clever comic series, but as a biography it is not skillfully executed.

BOOM! Studios new Decision 2012 series is a comic industry first; by structuring the release of each candidate’s comicbook biography based on the number of pre-orders, BOOM! is effectively polling the their reading community. BOOM!’s experiment is laudable, I am not certain that the end product will help anyone make a decision.

While this biographic piece is certainly informative, providing a detailed account of Obama’s early life, it is a study in strange dichotomies. The comic tries to be comprehensive, but reads like an exceedingly brief Wikipedia entry. The biography covers minute details of Obama’s childhood and his major accomplishments, but fails to address any of the controversies of his career.

Strikingly, Damian Coucerio’s art creates several absurd juxtapositions. For instance, there is a two-panel page in which the top panel shows that President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for his “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” The bottom panel, however, is simply a world map marked with stars where the US has deployed combat troops, which notes that Obama has twice increased troop levels in Afganistan, left 35,000 – 50,000 troops in Iraq, and ordered air strikes in Libya. We are left to wonder, is this a comment on his Peace Prize and illiberal war-making or a simple diachronic representation?

In addition to these strange artistic juxtapositions, “Obama #1” is noticeably one note. What I mean is, the anonymous author renders only two voices in the entire comic: an omniscient historical narrator and President Obama. By exclusively quoting Obama, the author gives us a sense only his words are important to his biography. This counter-intuitive notion is further emphasized by the selection of quotes used. The author cherry-picks selections from Obama’s most famous, and perhaps most televised, speeches. In one panel, Obama is quoted saying:

"In recent years, our government has forced what I believe is a false choice between sound science and moral values. As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for each other and work to ease human suffering. I believe we have been given the capacity and will to pursue this research—and the humanity and conscience to do so responsibly".

I am inclined to think that this quote is about stem-cell research, but the panel provides zero context and zero information. It makes me wonder, why include it?

While reading this comic, with its strange juxtapositions and cherry-picked quotes, I was struck with several inescapable conclusions. Living in the Bronx, I am reminded every day of our current economic crisis. As of April of this year, the Bronx has an unemployment rate of 12.5%, nearly twice as high as Manhattan. The US Census Bureau reports that a little more than one in four people in the Bronx lived below the poverty line in 2010. As of September the number of people on food stamps in the city was 1,831,882. Everyday, when I go to the grocery store and everyone in front of me pays with food stamps and everyday when I go down the street and see an increasing number of homeless people, I am reminded that things have not gotten that much better under President Obama.

This comic biography, by focusing exclusively on Obama’s accomplishments, whitewashes the economic realities of his presidency and most importantly his response to them. Whether you already plan to vote for him or not, this comic provides too little information to help readers decide either way. If your hot-buttons are banking regulations, gun control, and gay marriage or if tax reform, border control, and public employee unions get your goat, this comic does little to help judge Obama’s fitness for reelection. It provides a stale list of political accomplishments and does not provide any sense of context.

On a final note, I hope “Decision 2012: Barack Obama #1” foreshadows the tone and style of the GOP candidate biographies. If the Republican candidates’ comics focus even ever so slightly more on the controversies of their careers, or provide a more detailed style of near-photographic art, or are even less boring than this biography, they’ll have another liberal media bias to complain about. I hope BOOM! deprives them of that cliché.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.