20 Questions: Phantogram

Photo: Doron Gild

The sample-based electro-rock sound of Phantogram is undeniably unique, as the duo's latest mini-LP Nightlife demonstrates, but when answering PM's 20 Questions, Josh Carter reveals to us a rather strong affinity for the works of Charlie Kaufman, a desire to travel through dimensions, and lists no more than 15 different discs that could potentially qualify as "the greatest album ever" in his mind.

Being America's premiere sample-based psych-pop group certainly has its advantages.

Aside from having an extremely distinctive sound, becoming tourmates with the likes of the Antlers, the xx, and Minus the Bear, and getting much love from the likes of ?uestlove and OutKast's Big Boi, Phantogram (a NYC-based duo consisting of Josh Carter and Sarah Barthel) has had one simple problem that all bands eventually want to have: having too much music to release. The group's historic 2009 saw it putting out its debut album Eyelid Movies on Barsuk Records, along with two additional EPs. Phantogram's 2011 ended with it releasing a highly-regarded six-track mini-LP called Nightlife, which showed the group taking cues from the now-prominent chillwave movement, albeit on its own terms.

To help celebrate Nightlife's success and the tour that followed, Josh Carter took some time to sit down with PopMatters and answer the famed 20 Questions, here revealing a rather strong affinity for the works of Charlie Kaufman, a desire to travel through dimensions, and lists no more than 15 different discs that could potentially qualify as "the greatest album ever" in his mind . . .

* * *

1. The latest book or movie that made you cry?

The stories of Breece D'J Pancake.

2. The fictional character most like you?

[No answer given.]

3. The greatest album, ever?

Some of my favorites: the Beatles' White Album, Revolver, or Sgt. Pepper, Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon, the Flaming Lips' Soft Bulletin, My Bloody Valentine's Loveless, Radiohead's OK Computer, the Cure's Disintegration, Why?'s Eskimo Snow, Can's Tago Nago, the Wu-Tang Clan's 36 Chambers, J.Dilla's Donuts, the Smashing Pumpkins' Siamese Dream, Nine Inch Nails' The Downward Spiral, OutKast's Stankonia . . . too many to list.

4. Star Trek or Star Wars?

Star Wars for the story line . . . Star Trek (the original) for the music.

5. Your ideal brain food?

Coffee and cigarettes.

6. You're proud of this accomplishment, but why?

Making music for a living, because there's nothing I'd rather do.

7. You want to be remembered for . . . ?

[Being] someone who had a vision.

8. Of those who've come before, the most inspirational are?

Charlie Kaufman, John Lennon, Stanley Kubrick, Madlib.

9. The creative masterpiece you wish bore your signature?

The written screenplay for the film Adaptation.

10. Your hidden talents . . . ?

I can do a kickflip on a skateboard.

11. The best piece of advice you actually followed?

Big Boi told me to have more confidence in myself. He said, "Dope is dope."

12. The best thing you ever bought, stole, or borrowed?

A Tascam four-track tape machine. My parents bought it for me.

13. You feel best in Armani or Levis or . . . ?

I feel best with whatever I decide to go with for the day.

14. Your dinner guest at the Ritz would be?

Jesus Christ.

15. Time travel: where, when, and why?

Right now, in another dimension.

16. Stress management: hit man, spa vacation, or Prozac?


17. Essential to life: coffee, vodka, cigarettes, chocolate, or . . . ?

Coffee in the morning, cigarettes throughout the day, vodka at night.

18. Environ of choice: city or country, and where on the map?

Warm, sunny, beach.

19. What do you want to say to the leader of your country?

"Hey, what happened?"

20. Last but certainly not least, what are you working on, now?


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.