The Far Darker Justice of a Love Set Free: Catwoman #6

Is Batman simply the worst boyfriend ever? Or is the question for this issue of Catwoman: is Judd Winick the greatest feminist?

Catwoman #6

Publisher: DC
Length: 22 pages
Writer: Judd Winick, Guillem March
Price: $2.99
Publication Date: 2012-04

After reading this issue so many times now, it's the process of deletion that gets to me, time and again. Is Batman simply the worst boyfriend ever? In this issue writer Judd Winick wraps on a long, slow storyarc he has been building since issue one--the relationship between Batman and Catwoman. It's hard not to recall the necessity of the intimacy we encountered by the end of the first issue, "…And Most of the Costumes Stay On…". It was enough of a system-shock to see Batman and Catwoman in foreplay. The idea that their feelings for each other might not meet the test of romantic love, but might actually meet the test of physical passion seemed not only pitch-perfect, but far beyond the scope of a mainstream, superhero comicbook. Issue one was groundbreaking.

By issue three, Batman made a second guest appearance, this time to dissuade Catwoman's Selina Kyle (physically restrain, if so needed) from committing murder. The scene was as raw, as emotionally powerful and as riveting as anything. And it's now, with Issue Six's "Welcome to the Hard Way", that Selina must contend not only with corrupt Gotham City Police Department detectives, not only with the Batman himself, but with what Batman has done, possibly out of a sense of care for Selina.

The issue follows a fairly conventional Catwoman-style plot. One of the great joys of Judd's writing of this series has been the unexpected ease with which he's managed to solve the problem of how you tell the story of a jewel-thief with no discernible superpowers who is nevertheless one of Gotham's foremost Underworld supervillains. What exactly is the story of Catwoman? What could it be? Judd has made great strides in resisting the easy option of shifting the focus of New 52 Catwoman to the realm of character drama. None of the six issues thus far (and this bodes well for the next six issues, and for the six issues after that, and for the six after that…) have descended into being character-driven.

Sure there has been solid characterization throughout. But each issue's narrative arc has always wound through sufficient plot to not get caught in a 90s-style "talkie". There's been a process of discovering Selina's identity, her struggles, her art, her "powers", her emotional core. Yet another pitfall that Judd has avoided as writer, and another kind of pitfall that at first might not have seemed a pitfall, is turning Catwoman into a heist-book. Despite the glamourous sheen of Steven Soderbergh's Ocean's series, there are intelligent ways to do non-comedic versions of the heist-genre. In lesser hands, Catwoman could have become the vehicle for exactly this kind of reinvention of the heist-genre.

Instead, Judd has directed readers down the narrative path of Catwoman's perpetual flirtation with, and skin-of-her-teeth escape from danger. Whatever we learn about her character, and however her heists are pulled off, they all stem from the traditional superhero story structure. And although this trend goes barely noticed through these six issues past, this has been a quiet revolution in Catwoman storytelling. In fact, Catwoman is so good, it's hard to think of a better Catwoman story than the one that has been evolved over the past few months. Ed Brubaker's "On the Trail of Catwoman" certainly comes to mind (a backup story from the Greg Rucka era of Detective Comics), but this was more a Slam Bradley story, and it relied heavily on the highly stylized artwork of Darwyn Cooke. Judd Winick's Catwoman is as much of a surprise as David Lynch's A Straight Story after his wrapping Twin Peaks, as much of a surprise as David Cronenberg's Spider, right after eXistenZ.

But the one problem has always been the Batman. In a broader, ideological sense, will Catwoman ever really be free of him? Writer Scott Lobdell has struggled with the same issue in both of his New 52 books, in Red Hood & the Outlaws where he charts the course of Red Hood Jason Todd in an attempt to work himself free of the trap of the Batman, and in Teen Titans where Tim Drake's Red Robin struggles with the same. But Catwoman? Catwoman elevates the struggle almost to Shakespearean levels. There's something disconcertingly familiar about the tone of the book, something very Julius Caesar about Catwoman's struggle.

Batman's simply having deleted Catwoman from any kind of law enforcement database might give her the kind of freedom to pursue her illegal activities, but it also forces her into the shadowland of being an undocumented person within the US. What choice does she now have, but to retreat deeper into her thiefly pursuits? Catwoman's escape from corrupt GCPD detectives who would leave her at the mercy of a gun-for-hire supervillain while inside a precinct-house, and her subsequent confrontation with Batman, her lover, makes this issue remarkable.

It is the high-frequency emotional drama that elevates this single issue in the final analysis. Although nowhere near as dark as Jim Thompson's A Killer Inside my Mind, "Welcome to the Hard Way" is every bit as psychologically deep. In constructing as fine a drama as this for the parting of ways between lovers, for the end of a love affair, the soundtrack here isn't the quirky, kooky of Paul Simon on a track like "50 Ways to Leave your Lover", but the earnest, recalcitrant sense of loss that is evoked by Bruce Springsteen on a track like "Blood Brothers". Beyond any sense of romantic love, Catwoman deals with the ways in which the world diminishes our capacities to form bonds that will undertake greater things. This is a theme readily available in "Blood Brothers".

But the real question here, the question that unflinchingly runs to the heart of Judd's time on Catwoman is whether or not a man can write a woman. Are we trapped in ersatz, second-wave feminism that demands feminism is only a gender-specific option? You'll have to decide that for yourself. For my part however, Judd Winick has earned himself a fan.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.