'The Turin Horse': The Daughter Abides

In Béla Tarr's "last" work, the characters' silence speaks to this gorgeously black-and-white film's focus on hardship and brutality, survival and exhaustion.

The Turin Horse (A Torinói ló)

Director: Béla Tarr
Cast: János Derzsi, Erika Bók, Mihály Kormos
Rated: R
Studio: Cinema Guild
Year: 2011
US date: 2012-02-11 (Limited release)
UK date: 2012-06-01 (General release)

"Hey you." The screen is black, as Ohlsdorfer (János Derzsi) call out to his daughter (Erika Bók) from across the cottage they share in wildest, most barren Hungary. It's dark night, and the wind howls outside. "I can't hear them, can you?" the father asks. She has no idea what he means. The wind persists. "The woodworms, they're not doing it. I've heard them for past 58 years. Now I don’t hear them." The daughter calls back, "What's all about, papa?" He answers, "I don't know. Let's go to sleep."

This brief conversation is the longest you'll hear in The Turin Horse (A Torinói ló), the movie that Béla Tarr has called his last. More often, Ohlsdorfer and his daughter have little to say to one another, or to the horse that draws the cab with which he makes his living. They worry when that horse refuses to go out into the wind, they worry when the lights go out. And they worry too when the well runs dry. But they don't talk about it.

Their silence speaks to this gorgeously black-and-white film's focus on hardship and brutality, survival and exhaustion. The people are surely weary: it takes long minutes to walk from the barn to the cottage, to the well and the laundry line, bent against the wind that increases in velocity and noise over the six days that comprise the film. Inside, they sit, on their beds, at the thick wooden table where they eat boiled potatoes out of hammered metal bowls, sometimes on a chair set to look out the window.

Their view from inside is bleak, a far-off horizon where tree branches shake and dust blows, framed by a heavy, paned window, while the interior hardly seems safer or warmer, only less windy and darker. Inside and out, the steadicam is restless, tracking the horse heaving against its harness, swooping across the dry ground and around Ohlsdorfer's daughter as she makes her way to the well and fills buckets one by one, or following her from stove to table, from table to water tub. Every task is a journey.

Occasionally the camera stays still, as when Ohlsdorfer's daughter wakes each morning and dresses her father: she puts on his trousers, his short, his coat and his boots. Shot from different angles on subsequent days, this ritual has a weird sort of weight, in its repetition, its awkwardness, and in Ohlsdorfer's awful expression, gazing at his daughter with what might be affection but looks more like bewilderment, or imbecility, or something some base desire. Their relationship doesn't take much of a shape in The Turin Horse, though it's clear enough their lives are furiously, hopelessly intertwined. It's also clear enough that when the horse refuses to work -- and the storm builds -- those may be at more risk than usual.

The horse is the film's philosophical and narrative point of departure, as well as the first subject on screen. The story is inspired by one about Friedrich Nietzsche, spoken by a narrator at the film's start, over a black screen. One day in 1889 in Turin, he came upon a cabdriver whipping his horse, flung his arms around the horse's neck and sobbed, and then was returned to his home, where he spoke "the obligatory last words, 'Mutter, ich bin dumm.'" He then lapsed into dementia, the story goes, and was cared for over the next 10 years by his mother and sister.

The film's version of this story serves as a prologue that ends with something like a question, that no one knows what became of the horse. But neither does the story tell what happened to the mother and sister, only that they did what mothers and sisters do. The Turin Horse imagines the cab driver's abuse of his horse as a portent or (or at least a plot event before) apocryphal events. The film's numbered days become darker, windier, more difficult. Amid these changes, Ohlsdorfer and his daughter are incidental, elements in a landscape, unable to affect it or their fate, no matter their puny efforts to maintain routine, perhaps the most alarming sign of their so-called civilization.

This routine is most visible in the nameless daughter's experience. Her skirts blowing in the wind, her movements limited, her eyes dark and disenchanted, she's at once resilient and acquiescent, tending to her father's needs as well as the horse's, at once relentless and resigned. Her face, wide and lined and deeply shadowed, reflects the days stretching before her.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.