The Verdict for 'Tora! Tora! Tora!' Is the Same as the Event It Depicts: Japan 1, America 0

One of the last of the old-fashioned Hollywood blockbusters, Tora! Tora! Tora! offers both pleasure and tedium

Tora! Tora! Tora!

Director: Richard Fleischer, Toshio Masuda, Kinji Fukasaku
Cast: Martin Balsam, Joseph Cotton, So Yamamura, Tatsuya Mihashi
Distributor: Fox
Studio: 20th Century Fox
Release date: 2011-12

Tora! Tora! Tora! is a period piece in two senses of the phrase. One meaning is obvious: the film presents a detailed recreation of the December 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor, and the events leading up to it, at incredible multiples of the cost and preparation time required for the actual event. The second meaning may be less obvious, but is more relevant for contemporary viewers--Tora! Tora! Tora! is one of the last of its breed, an old-fashioned Hollywood epic produced at a time when that style of filmmaking had pretty much worn out its welcome with cinema audiences.

When Tora! Tora! Tora! was released in 1970, it was already a dinosaur in a world that had embraced a new style of film-making exemplified by groundbreaking films such as Bonnie and Clyde and Easy Rider. Dull extravagence was out, grit and “relevance” were in. Attitudes toward life and society had also changed, so a film about the heroism of war was particularly ill-timed, given the increasing opposition to America’s involvement in Vietnam.

Given the perspective of time, however, Tora! Tora! Tora! doesn’t look so bad—it’s no masterpiece, but it has aged better than expected, and offers a lot to enjoy even if it does seem determined to try your patience with its length (2 hours 25 minutes) and determinedly expository dialogue. As is well-known, it’s really two films in one, telling the story of Pearl Harbor from both the American and Japanese points of view.

For my money, the Japanese side of the story, directed by Toshio Masuda and Kinji Fukasaku, is a lot more interesting than the American side, directed by Richard Fleischer. For one thing, preparing for and going into battle is inherently more dramatic than all the things the Americans were doing instead of preparing for the attack that came. The script and acting on the Japanese side of the film is also a lot more subtle (multi-dimensional characters in a war film—what an idea!), so I'm afraid the verdict for the film is the same as for the attack itself: Japan 1, America 0.

The cast is not exactly all-star, but a fine assemblage of character actors (there was no money in the budget for any Hollywood stars, the one blockbuster element that is lacking in Tora! Tora! Tora!). For the American side you have, among others, Martin Balsam, Joseph Cotton, E.G. Marshall, James Whitmore, Jaaon Robards, and Leon Ames. For the Japanese, So Yamamura, Tatsuya Mihashi, Takahiro Tamura, Shogo Shimada, and Eijiro Tono. They’re all capable professionals who get the job done, and if none of their characters invite the audience to identify with them, that’s the fault of the script and direction rather than the actors.

No doubt film audiences were more patient in 1970 than they are today, but it still takes a long time to get to the action, and the deliberate and didactic way historical events are spelled out with title cards (“With the signing of the Tri-Partite Pact, Japan becomes the third member of the Axis Alliance”) over tableau vivants of the event in question may leave you wondering if you are watching an educational newsreel rather than a feature film. Still, for World War II buffs, there’s a lot of pleasure to be had just watching the events of the attack on Pearl Harbour unfold, pageant-style. The film was made with the cooperation of the Navy, who may have been hoping for a success along the lines of Fox’s 1972 film The Longest Day, as well as a chance to play a role in the blockbuster recreation of one of the few events of World War II that was most popularized for American audiences.

The technical effects are impressive, particularly considering that everything you see had to be staged (no CGI in 1970!), either with models or in reality. A.D. Flowers and L.B. Abbott deservedly won an Oscar for special effects, and Tora! Tora! Tora! was also nominated for Oscars in the categories of art direction, cinematography, film editing, and sound. In small doses, this film can be quite enjoyable; the problem is, again, that it’s almost two and a half hours long, and most of that is taken up with scenes of people talking to each other, alternating with impressive but static panoramas accentuated by a determinedly old-fashioned score by Jerry Goldsmith that never misses a chance to scream at you: “This is really important!”

The Blu-Ray release of Tora! Tora! Tora! will appeal most to people who are already fans of the film, or who are interested in it because of the historical events portrayed. Fox has packaged the disc in a handsome, book-format case, with 22 pages of notes including information about the featured aircraft, the production process, and the principal characters in the historical events and the actors who play them in the film. The disc itself includes a generous package of extras, including a commentary track by Fleischer and film historian Stuart Galbraith IV, the "extended Japanese version" of the film (about four minutes longer), a documentary about the attack, an AMC Backstory feature on the film, a making-of documentary, a collection of Fox Movietone newsreels about the attack, two galleries of photos, and the original theatrical trailer.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.