Reviews

Game of Thrones

It has a lot of flaws, but it also has enough good things to keep you playing to the end and to ensure that you don’t feel guilty about playing to the end.


Game of Thrones

Publisher: Atlus
Rated: Mature
Players: 1
Price: $59.99
Platforms: Xbox 360 (reviewed), PS3, PC
Developer: Cyanide Studio
Release Date: 2012-05-15
URL

Game of Thrones opens with a very generic looking menu. This is a warning sign, and you should brace yourself appropriately. Doing so will help you get through the mediocre gameplay and also help you better appreciate the well crafted story.

You play as Mors Westford, a member of the Nights Watch, and Alester Sarwyck, a Red Priest of R’hllor, who has come home to bury his father, and you will jump between them each chapter until their stories converge. Their stories are compelling, and while the rest of the game isn’t necessarily bad, the plot -- and these two characters specifically -- carry the entire game. They’re well realized with realistic motivations, tragic back stories, and genuine character arcs all set within a plot that twists around the established fiction in some interesting ways.

The pacing is surprisingly deliberate at first. You do lots of talking and not a lot of fighting, and when your sword does come out, the violence is justified and brief. It’s a refreshing change of pace from your typical action RPG, but it doesn’t last. The game can’t resist the temptation to throw lots of enemies at you, and when it does, the situations feels forced and awkward because of the well-paced beginning. For example, at one point you kill a guard and actually get arrested -- your video game violence has consequences, nice -- but then during your escape you kill about two dozen guys and no one seems to care.

The great characters and twisty plot suffer even more from poor presentation. The dialogue is horrible. People just go on and on with some especially repetitive exposition being the chief topic of these long winded conversations. Yes, hiding an important girl amongst whores is a clever idea, but you don’t have to say that every single time that the subject comes up. This bad writing masks the good parts of the plot, since it’s easy to zone out during important conversations. They’re just so damn boring! The acting is fine overall -- a few minor characters are terrible -- but Mors is so good he makes up for them.

However, there’s one twist about three quarters of the way through the game that threatens to derail the entire thing: As a standalone fantasy adventure, the twist is unearned and cheap. As a story within the Game of Thrones universe, it breaks its own logic while adding nothing of value. This is the moment that will most strain your patience with the game as it seems to gleefully kneecap the one thing it has going for it, the characters. The fact that the game not only recovers from such horrid writing but actually manages to end with a strong dramatic punch is a testament to its characterization. Its endings really are that good.

Sadly, unlike the source material, this Game of Thrones isn’t a novel, so there’s a lot of middling gameplay thrown in in between the intriguing plot points. It’s not bad, but it’s not good either. It’s just busy work.

The combat could have been great. Hitting a bumper button slows time and allows you to choose a specific attack from a wheel menu. The fact that time doesn’t stop keeps the action moving and adds a level of tension to your strategizing. Status effects matter a great deal since some attacks do significantly more damage under certain conditions, giving you a reason to strategize and not just attack absentmindedly. Much of the combat is about set up and preparation. For example, I might make Mors knock a guy down because Alester can do more damage to guys that are knocked down. On top of all this, different weapons are more effective against certain kinds of armor: Chain mail is weak to piercing weapons, leather armor is weak against cutting weapons, and so on.

The sad thing is that the game never takes advantage of its own mechanics. When fighting against two or three guys, you can easily kill them without worrying about set up or weapon type, but when up against five or six guys at once (which is pretty common), victory seems more due to luck than effective strategy. I’m either overpowered or underpowered, and the combat never reaches a nice challenging middle ground.

During some chapters with Mors, you’ll be able to jump into the body of his dog and play a simple but fun stealth game. The dog can move through cracks in doors and walls, taking shortcuts that humans never could. You use these new paths to sneak up behind patrolling guards and literally rip their throats out, clearing the path for Mors. It’s a satisfying bit of gameplay, but it is ultimately pointless since you can also run through with Mors and kill everyone that way. There’s no incentive to send the dog through first because the normal combat is already so easy. An interesting idea brought down by poor combat balance.

The economy is also frustrating. In the beginning of the game, the only items worth buying are so expensive that it seems like you’ll never be able to afford them. Then, all throughout the middle, there are no shops, so you’ll accumulate a host of useless weapons, armor, and items. By the end, when you do find a shop, you can sell so much stuff that you suddenly become wealthy and everything is easily affordable. Like the combat, the economy swings from one extreme to the other, never reaching that properly balanced middle ground.

Game of Thrones feels half finished in a lot of ways. Many of its mechanics sound great on paper, but they fail in execution because they’re not properly balanced. As such, Game of Thrones is more of a missed opportunity than anything else. It has a lot of flaws, but there are also enough good things within it to keep you playing to the end and to ensure that you don’t feel guilty about playing to the end.

5

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

Electronic music is one of the broadest-reaching genres by design, and 2017 highlights that as well as any other year on record. These are the 20 best albums.


20. Vitalic - Voyager (Citizen)

Pascal Arbez-Nicolas (a.k.a. Vitalic) made waves in the French Touch electro-house scene with his 2005 debut, OK Cowboy, which had a hard-hitting maximalist sound, but several albums later, Voyager finds him launching into realms beyond at his own speed. The quirky, wallflower vocals and guitar snippets employed throughout Voyager drop a funk that brings to mind WhoMadeWho or Matthew Dear if they had disco-pop injected between their toes. "Levitation" is as pure a slice of dance floor motivation as theoretically possible, a sci-fi gunfight with a cracking house beat sure to please his oldest fans, yet the album-as-form is equally effective in its more contemplative moments, like when Miss Kitten's vocals bring an ethereal dispassion to "Hans Is Driving" to balance out its somber vocoder or the heartfelt cover of "Don't Leave Me Now" by Supertramp. Voyager may infect you with a futuristic form of Saturday Night Fever, but afterwards, it gives you a hearty dose of aural acetaminophen to break it. - Alan Ranta


Keep reading... Show less
Film

Hitchcock, 'Psycho', and '78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene'

Alfred Hitchock and Janet Leigh on the set of Psycho (courtesy of Dogwoof)

"... [Psycho] broke every taboo you could possibly think of, it reinvented the language of film and revolutionised what you could do with a story on a very precise level. It also fundamentally and profoundly changed the ritual of movie going," says 78/52 director, Alexandre O. Philippe.

The title of Alexandre O. Philippe's 78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene (2017) denotes the 78 set-ups and the 52 cuts across a full week of shooting for Psycho's (1960) famous shower scene. Known for The People vs. George Lucas (2010), The Life and Times of Paul the Psychic Octopus (2012) and Doc of the Dead (2014), Philippe's exploration of a singular moment is a conversational one, featuring interviews with Walter Murch, Peter Bogdanovich, Guillermo del Toro, Jamie Lee Curtis, Osgood Perkins, Danny Elfman, Eli Roth, Elijah Wood, Bret Easton Ellis, Karyn Kusama, Neil Marshall, Richard Stanley and Marli Renfro, body double for Janet Leigh.

Keep reading... Show less

Mary Poppins, Mrs. Gamp, Egyptian deities, a Japanese umbrella spirit, and a supporting cast of hundreds of brollies fill Marion Rankine's lively history.

"What can go up a chimney down but can't go down a chimney up?" Marion Rankine begins her wide-ranging survey of the umbrella and its significance with this riddle. It nicely establishes her theme: just as umbrellas undergo, in the everyday use of them, a transformation, so too looking at this familiar, even forgettable object from multiple perspectives transforms our view of it.

Keep reading... Show less
7

Those who regard the reclusive Argerich as one of the world's two or three greatest living pianists—classical or otherwise—would not have left the concert hall disillusioned.

In a staid city like Washington, D.C., too many concert programs still stick to the basics. An endless litany of Rachmaninoff and Tchaikovsky concerti clog the schedules and parades of overeager virtuosi seem unwilling to vary their repertoire for blasé D.C. concertgoers. But occasionally you encounter a concert that refreshes your perspective of the familiar. The works presented at The Kennedy Center on 25 October 2017 might be stalwarts of 20th century repertoire, but guest conductor Antonio Pappano, leading the Orchestra dell'Accademia Nazionale di Santa Cecilia, reminded us how galvanizing the canonical can still be. Though grandiose executions of Respighi's The Fountains of Rome and The Pines of Rome were the main event, the sold-out crowd gathered to see Martha Argerich perform one of her showpieces, Prokofiev's Third Piano Concerto. Those who regard the reclusive Argerich as one of the world's two or three greatest living pianists—classical or otherwise—would not have left the concert hall disillusioned.

Keep reading... Show less
9
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image