Jon DeRosa: A Wolf in Preacher's Clothes

This is time-travelling, but it doesn’t feel like it. Rather DeRosa’s connecting the dots across the musical timeline, in the way most of our record collections do, while uniting it all into one compelling sound and feeling.

Jon DeRosa

A Wolf in Preacher’s Clothes

Label: Mother West
US Release Date: 2012-05-08
UK Release Date: Import

Jon DeRosa is a musical renaissance man. Known primarily for his synthpop/drone/ambient project Aarktica (which also covered Danzig), he’s had a troubadour country/folk group (Pale Horse and Rider), a gloomier folk group (Dead Leaves Rising) and sang on some of Stephin Merritt’s Showtunes. At first the latter might seem most relevant to his first LP under his own name, A Wolf in Preacher’s Clothes, which was produced by Charles Newman, who has worked with the Magnetic Fields, and includes a song written by LD Beghtol, who sang on 69 Love Songs and wrote a 33 1/3 Series book about the album (to which DeRosa contributed a crossword puzzle – renaissance man, indeed!). A Wolf in Preacher’s Clothes has cover art that’s somewhat reminiscent of the cover art for Frank Sinatra Sings for Only the Lonely (1959), and is a sophisticated pop record with strings and piano and more of a crooner’s vocal style than on DeRosa’s previous works. Really though, the Danzig and the post-punk and goth and ambient influences are all here still, just smoothed over into something which often resembles a late-night, cocktail-drinker’s moment of bittersweet reflection.

It’s also often a bright-in-tone, fresh-in-appearance collection of stirring and catchy pop songs. Look at a song like “Teenage Goths”, which bounces along with a sprightliness we’re not used to from DeRosa. At the same time, the song contains some serious existential pondering, unanswered prayers, along with its nostalgia for the past. On the whole, A Wolf in Preacher’s Clothes falls somewhere between Jerome-Kern-type classic songcraft and the incisive, philosophical approach of his other work.

“Snow Coffin”, previously released on a like-minded EP, feels like it looks backwards not to Tin Pan Alley but to ‘80s or early ‘90s dreampop, as it tells an enigmatic story that could be Gothic horror tale or a war tale or a love story. “Ladies Who Love”, which starts off with sullen strings around the line, “Ladies should never fall in love / They become stars no one can reach”, ends quite spacey, disarming for the strangeness of the turn it takes. There’s a song about masculinity and hard work that sounds like it could come off a radio from the ‘40s or ‘50s (“True Men”). Its demeanor also keeps reminding me of the hardened characters in the bleak crime fiction from that same era that I read too much of (think David Goodis, Jim Thompson, etc.). That song sits comfortably on the album with a straightforward piano-ballad version of the 1983 song “Easter Parade” by the great atmospheric pop stylists the Blue Nile, a new version of the Aarktica song “Hollow Earth Theory” and at least one overt reference to ‘70s-era Lou Reed. So this is time-travelling, but it doesn’t feel like it. Rather he’s connecting the dots across the musical and cultural timeline, in the way most of our record collections do, while uniting it all into one compelling sound and feeling.

For all its sad loveliness, the album carries inside it a punk aversion to fluff and cliché, a leaning towards darkness and minimalism that might seem more rock than pop, along with its dreaming heart, that of a romantic, but perhaps a cynical one. A song like “Don’t Say Goodnight” is both something that could be in a Fred Astaire movie and an anti-sentimental argument for plainspoken-ness. In that way he's embodying the romantic pop ballad form while subverting it. The song is also an exercise in space and air, illustrating the way wind can blow through a song and leave it open to possibility and mystery. The whole album is like this – not unfamiliar, but at the same time completely surprising and exciting.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.