Ty Segall Band: Slaughterhouse

After the spacier Hair, Segall's first album with his touring band is exactly what its title implies: a tensed-up, massacre of thrashing guitars and pounding drums.

Ty Segall Band


US Release: 2012-06-26
Label: In the Red
UK Release: 2012-06-25
Artist Website
Label Website

It's been a pretty good couple of years for Ty Segall. The once under-the-radar garage-rock guru has stepped out into the light with a series of great releases. His decidedly poppier pysch record Goodbye Bread came out on Drag City last year to basically universal praise, followed by a collected singles compilation that let the world know what Segall had been up to in his lo-fi rock and roll cave for years, and then earlier this year Segall recorded Hair, a collaborative album with White Fence's Tim Presley. Each of these records -- and the ones that came before them -- are great, and no two sound alike.

So it's no real surprise that Slaughterhouse sounds very much like a Ty Segall record but also like no Ty Segall record before. Recording as the Ty Segall Band, this marks the first time Segall has recorded with his touring band -- Mikal Cronin, Charlier Moothart, and Emily Rose Epstein -- and the difference is palpable. You can feel the group's chemistry, the blistering live energy, and that strange alchemy that comes when like-minded players work together. It's also fitting that the album is coming out on In the Red, a label long devoted to great rock and roll records and the crunchiest guitars money (or lack there of) can buy.

After the more spacey psych tunes on Hair, Slaughterhouse is exactly what its title implies: a tensed-up, massacre of thrashing guitars and pounding drums. The opening track "Death" starts with squeals of feedback and bent-to-snapping notes, the sound of a band turning up the distortion, seeing how messy it can get, before they launch their attack. When the song kicks in, the pay-off is immediate. The guitars and bass rumble with a sharp, lean angle to them under Segall's echoed, chilling vocals. He shouts later in the record, but the deadpan vocal harmonies here play nicely against the unwieldy grind behind them.

The song is no red herring. "I Bought My Eyes" may seem to turn down the fuzz with those first few relatively clean, reverbed chords and those downright sweet vocals, but it's a brief respite before the song erupts in a blistering riff-fest. This isn't crushing chords, but instead lacerating runs of notes and a solo that threatens to break nearly every string, bringing the tension of the song to a stirring peak. Later songs like the sped-up shuffle of "The Tongue" or the sludge-rock hammering of "Wave Goodbye" show the band's versatility. They're not hiding behind speed and energy at all here. There's nothing amateurish about these fuzzed-out tunes. "Tell Me What's Inside Your Heart", one of the most sprinting songs on the record, succeeds not on pure inertia but on sweet, Wilson-esque backing vocals and a lilting vocal melody pitting against those sharp guitar hooks. Even when things get unruly, as on the squealing, screaming "That's the Bag I'm In", all that untethered volume plays against a steady, rolling bass line. All the way through Slaughterhouse you can hear the order under the storm, so even if this turns away from the catchy accessibility of Goodbye Bread, it's still yet one more example of Segall's ever refining pop sensibilities.

So yes, these songs can earworm their way into your head, but make no mistake they live on sheer volume and brash tones, and the guitars carry the load on that front. Sure Segall screams his ways through the title track or "Mary Ann", but those moments actually seem to press a bit, like they're trying too hard to get loud. That's because it's the brittle tension and white-noise squall of the guitars -- whether their chords are surrounding us or their riffs are piercing through us -- that makes all this racket work. It's convincing because, for all its fury, it's carefully controlled, so when the album takes the last ten minutes, on "Fuzz War", to bring back the noisemaking that started "Death", to fill our ears with crashing cymbals and formless distortion and endless feedback, it feels like too much, like a tacked-on indulgence that does nothing the rest of the record doesn't do better. It's a fitting coda for a moment, a minute to let the ripples of all these tunes wash over you, but it quickly becomes overkill. That said, Slaughterhouse is still a hell of a rock album, one that shows us the speedy evolution of Segall as a songwriter and gives us a convincing document of his touring band's energy. It's the rare artist that can pin down their own sound without repeating themselves, especially in the limited elements of guitar-bass-drums rock. But Segall has done just that, and Slaughterhouse is his most volatile shift yet.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.