Serj Tankian: Harakiri

In which we ask "Does America really need a third Serj Tankian solo album?" and America responds, "There was a second Serj Tankian solo album?"

Serj Tankian


Label: Reprise/Serjical Strike
Release Date: 2012-07-10

No one left System of a Down during their hiatus in 2005 with more goodwill than singer Serj Tankian. Once the man with a voice (and passionate, political lyrics) that was his group's driving characteristic, he had been flat-out neutered by the band's pair of #1 albums in 2005, Mesmerize and Hypnotize.

On those two albums, Tankian split a distracting and confounding amount of the songwriting and vocal duties with guitarist Daron Malakian, who delivered such winning couplets as "Such a lonely day, and it's mine / The most loneliest day of my life." Seriously, have you listened to those albums in a while? It's amazing what a total misstep allowing Malakian to take on more of the lead was, as SOAD went from a schizophrenic, edge-of-your-seat alt-metal band, to a middle of the road radio-rock outfit by the time of their hiatus.

The point is, Tankian -- left to his own devices -- should have been a winning idea. Yet, we're three albums and five years in. Did you know that there have been three solo albums, live EPs, a couple of remix records, and a complete mindfuck of a detour into symphony work? (Think a slightly less comprehensible S&M on second record Imperfect Harmonies.) And you have to wonder what is going on with Tankian's career, especially now that System of a Down have been playing shows again for more than a year.

The results on third album Harakiri (which is a Japanese form of ritualistic suicide) don't exactly answer those questions. Tankian brings back the punk-rock base of SOAD's early music, but none of the metal, which results in the most confusing, drab, inexplicable pop-punk album I've heard in years. That doesn't necessarily mean it's all bad, though.

Take opening track "Cornucopia", which would sound right in between sets on the Warped Tour. It's a straight up melodic punk love song. He actually sings, "I love you / in the stormy weather." We're a long, long way from Toxicity, gang. At least it throws away a couple of lines towards Tankian's never dormant political side ("We fuck the earth, and don't know why it cries!"). The song switches up the beat every 45 seconds or so, a nod to the prog-symphonics of Imperfect Harmonies and moves on.

That's more or less what Harakiri gives you. On "Figure It Out", Serj pulls out the ol' "Talk-singing your lyrics through a megaphone, thus making your words more obscured" trick from Ye Olde Alt Rock Cliches. Seriously, when's the last time anyone thought this was a cool idea?

All this said, there are only a couple of truly indefensible moments on Harakiri. He straight up scats and comes close to freestyling on "Ching Chime". It's the kind of tune System of a Down would piss away and get out of their system back in the day. Instead, Tankian takes it seriously, as if it's a real, meaningful song, and it goes past four unlistenable minutes. "Occupied Tears", which goes from beats to lounge music, seems like a failed attempt at launching a Mike Patton-esque solo career. The payoff for the beatbox-laden "Deafening Silence" never comes.

It's annoying when Tankian fails, because he's still got one of rock's most compelling voices, capable of selling any ham-fisted, campus liberal line when he's truly into it. Plus, the music behind it isn't half bad. There's very little metal to it, but hearing Serj's voice over a straight up punk-rock record is a great idea, if he'd commited to it. "Uneducated Democracy" is the most ragged song on this album, and it's no coincidence that it's the only song that feels like it might actually go somewhere on an album that wastes so much of it's time throwing the kitchen sink at you. Yet it comes up totally predictable.

Maybe that's why early System of a Down records were such a success. They felt dangerous, yet balanced and melodic enough that you felt as if you could sneak them past your mom. Tankian's gone so far down the rabbit hole on Harakiri, it has to worry you whether the group, which has kept it's fans waiting at least seven years for new material, might have lost that balance on what now sound like self-indulgent side-projects in the wake of their return.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.