News

Chuck Berry is Rock Hall’s American Music Masters 2012 honoree

Randy Lewis
Los Angeles Times (MCT)

LOS ANGELES — There’s just one question about the announcement that Chuck Berry is the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum’s honoree for the 17th installment of its American Music Masters series weeklong tribute and career celebration this fall: How did it possibly take 17 years for the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame to get to Chuck Berry?

If the pioneering singer, songwriter and guitarist, 85, isn’t the father of rock ‘n’ roll, the burden of proof clearly is on anyone making a case for someone more deserving of the title. Berry was among the inaugural class of 10 inductees into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame when it opened in 1986, and in the words of Rock Hall President and CEO Terry Stewart in the statement announcing his selection, “Chuck Berry created the language of rock ‘n’ roll. We stand on his foundation and we are thrilled to honor him and welcome him to Cleveland.”

As rock poet, singer and songwriter Leonard Cohen put it earlier this year when he and Berry were selected as the first recipients of PEN New England awards for song lyrics of literary excellence: “If Beethoven hadn’t rolled over, there wouldn’t have been room for any of us. All of us are footnotes to the work of Chuck Berry.”

In any case, Berry’s music will be saluted in “Roll Over Beethoven: The Life and Music of Chuck Berry” encompassing a tribute concert at which the man himself is slated to perform Oct. 27 after a week of interviews, panel discussions, films and academic and educational programs. More details are available at the hall’s website; information about the lineup and tickets for the tribute concert will be distributed by way of an e-newsletter.

The American Music Masters series, presented by the Rock Hall in conjunction with Case Western Reserve University, began in 1996 with a program honoring folk music giant Woody Guthrie and has since explored the life and careers of such musicians as Jerry Lee Lewis, Les Paul, Lead Belly, Sam Cooke, Aretha Franklin, Janis Joplin, Fats Domino and Dave Bartholomew.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image