Music

Thee Oh Sees: Putrifiers II

Putrifiers II is a worthy addition to Thee Oh Sees' growing canon, and an agreeable starting point for those who want to hear the band’s woolly take on psychedelic sounds infused with a dollop of pop.


Thee Oh Sees

Putrifiers II

Label: In the Red
US Release Date: 2012-09-18
UK Release Date: 2012-09-18
Amazon
iTunes

John Dwyer’s San Francisco based group Thee Oh Sees (a play on the term Orange County) is prolific to say the least. Putrifiers II, the band’s latest release, is its 14th since its formation in 1997, if you count records under former band names such as OCS and the OhSees. And that’s not counting EPs, seven-inches, and compilations. So, yes, Dwyer and company have a lot of ideas, if not outright songs. However, Thee Oh Sees have been relatively quiet this year, seeing that Putrifiers II is the first album to sprout from the band within the first nine months of 2012. Maybe the relatively long lag time, for this group meant, at least, that they spent a great deal of their waking hours honing their songs to a relative degree. Well, if so, Putrifiers II is generally the proof: Aside from the odd weird blip here and there, the record is choc-a-bloc with mind altering psychedelic gems that recall the best output of the ‘60s while retaining a bit of a signature sound. And though things don’t quite get too far out there, Putrifiers II is definitely in the weird category: How else could you describe an album that boasts a lyric such as “Remember a day when fat kids got high”?

What Putrifiers II ultimately is, though, is a walk down nostalgia lane, roping in elements of genres from the beginnings of rock and roll. Heck, the song “Will We Be Scared?” is even the kind of thing you’d hear a good six decades ago with its walking bass line and R&B-like sound. But that isn’t the only throwback to be found on the disc. Closer “Wicked Park” is a slice of ‘60s baroque pop with its strings and acoustic guitars. “Goodnight Baby” and “Hang a Picture” has that gummy bear retro-psychedelic pop feel that the Apples in Stereo mined very early in their career. And, of course, first single “Lupine Dominus” is garnering a great deal of attention in the blogosphere for its similarities to ‘70s Krautrock, which would also be ignoring the fact that the song’s bassline is ripped straight from the Spencer Davis Group’s “Gimme Some Lovin’”.

All in all, Putrifiers II (and there is no Putrifiers I in the band’s discography – it was supposedly scrapped after the band failed to fuse Celine Dion, free jazz and showtunes) is a big sopping love letter to the past, and it usually succeeds quite admirably. It's as though Dwyer and company spent a great deal of time rifling through albums in their record collection, and then tried to replace those sounds with a slight off-kilter sensibility. The songs tend to have hooky hooks, and ride a certain groove – though sometimes Thee Oh Sees are guilty of trying to milk a good thing perhaps a bit too much. After all, the title track runs more than six minutes long and “Will We Be Scared?” is in the five-and-a-half minute territory. However, when the band is on stun, they’re really quite stunning. Perhaps the most rifftastic track to be found on the entire contents of Putrifiers II is none other than opening song “Wax Face”, which is played on guitars at warp speed and locks itself into a fantastic rhythm that is smooth, throttling itself into hyper drive with its outbound sense of propulsion.

Despite the fact that some of the songs might be a smidge too long, Putrifiers II does kind of trip over its own two feet on the third and fourth tracks to a degree: “So Nice” is a dirge of a piece, one with a careening viola, and has a bit of a sea shanty feel that’s a bit too oddball for the sake of being so, notwithstanding the fact that its languid pace seems a bit out of sorts with the rest of the material. Follow-up “Cloud #1” is nearly two minutes of droning keyboards that will either make your ears bleed or your teeth ache. It, too, seems a bit of a baffler in its inclusion, considering the remainder of the album offers some very sweet melodies and delightful songs. However, the record rights itself after that with the awesome “bah bah ba ba bahs” of “Flood’s New Light” that you can sing along to. Overall, Putrifiers II might be a little too much of a record that tries to fuse too many ideas together, and feels more like a random collection of songs as opposed to a seamless whole. However, it is a toe-tapping and inspiring disc with an acute sense of the best elements of musical styles plucked from the pop past.

When it works, Putrifiers II is a remarkably focused record that lays thick on hummable melodies while retaining a hint of the weird. When it doesn’t, and that isn’t too often, thankfully, Putrifiers II comes off as being a tad bit on the pretentious side. However, the disc is a worthy addition to Thee Oh Sees' growing canon, and an agreeable starting point for those who want to hear the band’s woolly take on psychedelic sounds infused with a dollop of pop. Putrifiers II may not be perfect, but it is ultimately far, far from being putrid. If you’re a scholar of early rock, this is a record and a band that is quite worthy of checking out. And, if you find this sort of thing agreeable, there’s another 13 albums to go and discover. Not counting EPs, singles and compilations, of course. Happy diving.

7

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image