Games

Missing the Point in 'Metroid: Other M'

Metroid: Other M captures the look of other Metroid games, but it fails to capture their spirit.

I'm spending some time going through my video game backlog this summer, which is why I've been playing Metroid: Other M. I understand why it wasn't particularly well-received. I think the game's systems are actually pretty interesting, but I can definitely see why the third/first-person view switching and motion controls would irritate some people. I'm much more sympathetic to criticisms of the game's story and writing. Abbie Heppe's review sums up my feelings on it. Other M is marred by a hackneyed, unimaginative script and a portrayal of Samus that characterizes her as scared and subservient. It's truly disheartening to see one of video games's most competent female protagonists reduced to a child-like state of obedience.

I actually think these weaknesses are symptoms of a larger problem with the game, though. Other M suffers because it tries to emulate some of the series's traditions without understanding why they are important (or even if they are important at all). The blind devotion to the accumulated lore of the Metroid saga stifles the game.

The Point of Wall Jumps

Wall jumps were special in Super Metroid because they were secret and they required skill. You either stumbled upon the technique yourself or had to observe NPCs to learn the technique. Pulling the move off required precise timing and the dexterity to shift Samus's momentum quickly. It encapsulates the exploratory and mysterious nature of the game. It is right in front of you from the beginning of the game, but it doesn't become apparent until you investigate further.

Other M treats the wall jump as a franchise symbol but removes its spontaneity and skill requirements. The moment that you're in need of the move, a text bubble pops up and tells you specifically how to do it, making sure to alert you that you actually shouldn't press left and right on the d-pad in order to spring off walls; the game will do that for you. The move effectively becomes busy work that you use in very specific areas. It has the trappings of the original, but it lacks the soul.

Gaining Abilities

The Metroid series is well known for its use of the "abilitease." Through some string of events, Samus loses some of her suit's technology at some point between or during her adventures and must piece it back together over the course of the game. Doing so serves a mechanical purpose by helping guide players through the game and allowing them to perfect skills before adding more. It's a well-worn technique across many different games -- one that often feels contrived. Still, it can be a useful teaching tool that also serves a story function, as Samus's acquisition of new skills mirrors the player's while also representing her personal progress.

Other M's approach to ability progression asks the player for a ridiculous suspension of disbelief. Instead of explaining Samus's loss of power with an injury or technological flaw, we're asked to accept that Samus willingly refuses to use her entire arsenal in order to curry the favor of Adam, her former commanding officer. The result is a character who is constantly asking permission to use her own property and accepting the orders of someone who isn't even her boss. In practice, Other M's ability restrictions feel like they exist simply because prior games set the precedent. Samus following orders is simply a contrivance for a dynamic that does not fit in the game, yet was included anyway.

Scanning

Metroid Prime introduced the scanning visor to the series and used it to communicate information about enemies, the environment, and story elements. It was an elegant way to convey tactical information and optional plot information for those interested in Metroid lore. It took advantage of the then-novel first-person perspective, but it was largely optional.

Other M uses the first-person perspective, but removes the freedom found in the Prime series. At scripted points, all the on-screen action stops and you're forced to go into first person mode and pixel hunt until you find the one object that needs scanning. This makes the world feel fake and misses the point of what made first-person scanning interesting. Without multiple options or player agency, scanning in Other M is compulsory busy work rather than an exercise in exploration. Its obligatory inclusion misses the point -- it's used to force the players down a linear path rather than to encourage them to explore an intricate world.

Other M is full of these types of missteps. Whether it is reading too far into small details from Metroid lore (such as Samus' use of the "thumbs-up" signal) or pointlessly incorporating aspects from past games (like when Samus needlessly endangers her life by shedding her Power Suit in favor of the skimpy Zero Suit), Other M continually fails to understand the elements that made people love the previous games.

All this brings us back to the game's demeaning, incompetent portrayal of Samus. How does a hero go from being a galactic hero to the scared child that we see in this cutscene:


Looking for an answer, I did some digging and found that there is Metroid manga in which Ridley terrorizes a young Samus and then kills her family. This ill-advised investment in obscure lore is the game's undoing. Other M seems intent on cramming every aspect of the convoluted expanded universe into the game, regardless of whether it fits or captures the ethos of past games. I'm sure there are folks out there that love the convoluted backstory, but that lore was made possible by games that focused on polished mechanics, exploration, and a protagonist defined by quiet strength. Other M loses sight of all of these things.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image