"When This Began…": Exclusive Preview of "Green Lantern: New Guardians #12"

Some of the most endearing reboots of the New 52 have been the older intellectual properties, now long abandoned. New Guardians in particular, stands out as a secret staging area for what new spins on classic ideas could become.

Some of the most endearing New 52 reboots (I can say this safely now that we're on the cusp of rounding out the first year of the New 52), has been the older properties.

Take the New Guardians. In there original ideation, they were the evolutionary precursors of a new kind of humanity--what humans would be one millennium from today when were more fully evolved and could join the cosmic-scale entities, the Guardians of the Universe, as equals.

The original ideation of the New Guardians played out around 1988/89, in the wake of the Millennium event that followed on from the highly successful Crisis on Infinite Earths and Legends. Back then, just before the '90s, a highly creative, deeply thought-provoking, critically entertaining book like New Guardians failed to find its audience, and ultimately proved non-viable, commercially.

But what New Guardians proved, in the twilight-world before DC/Vertigo and before Dark Horse and before Image Comics and before the first viable platform for creator-owned works, was that the comics fan-base itself was deeply secessionist from the cultural mainstream. That the comics brands that could be trusted (Superman, Batman, Captain America, Iron Man) would perhaps be the only brands we'd ever want to trust. That expanding beyond the known, the established, the familiar, might just be too much to ask.

The first New Guardians seem, and it saddens me still, to have been martyred on the very last of altars of the Cold War--lost to a world where that essential inner newness might have been fought for, but would seldom live on after that battle.

Tony Bedard's New Guardians is simply a revolution. It lays to rest the ghosts of not only the unclaimed newness of the original New Guardians, but lays to rest the ghosts of the last days of the Cold War itself.

Rather than a story about igniting the next phase of human evolution, Tony's New Guardians deals with protracting the story of the Emotional Spectrum developed by Geoff Johns over the course of the last five or so years. This time round, the Guardians aren't just ideologically split about evolving human consciousness, but they're actively involved in wiping out sentient life across the universe ("read all about it", as they say in Geoff's own, Green Lantern).

But some mysterious force has drawn together Lanterns from each of the seven separate Corps, and has the emotional energies of Rage, Avarice, Fear, Will, Hope, Compassion and Love all working together towards a single, as-yet-unrevealed objective.

Tony's New Guardians, with its year-long overarching storyarc about who brought together the "New Guardians" and why, and its monthly episodic, skirmish-style encounter stories, has proven wholly engaging. But more than that, it's reclaimed the psychic territory that the original New Guardians had hoped to claim, way back in 1988--to prove that even among the grand old, iconic stories about the classic superheroes (heroes invented long before our own lifetimes in the 30s and 40s and later in the 50s and 60s), something new can emerge.

At a conceptual level then, Tony's New Guardians traces very much the same path as Linkin Park's second album Re:Animation, wherein the band edit and mix and tireless experiment with the original magic of their debut album, Hybrid Theory. It's that tirelessness that lies at the heart of the New 52, and that same tirelessness that flourishes on every page of New Guardians.

Oh and, if you were wondering about who brought together these new New Guardians and why… answers are to be found right here in this preview. But wait till you read the rest of the issue…

Please, enjoy your exclusive preview of the next issue of Green Lantern: New Guardians, available for your downloading pleasure.


Page One

Page Two

Page Three

Page Four

Page Five

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.