Death and Meaning in 'The Walking Dead'

Deciding who dies has far less meaning than deciding how we move forward with those left behind.

Warning: The post contains spoilers for Episode 3, “Long Road Ahead”, of The Walking Dead.

Over on the massive The Walking Dead Wiki, a poll asks visitors whether they liked the three character deaths in the recently released third Episode of The Walking Dead video game. The overwhelming majority of respondents selected “No! I wasn’t given the choice of letting them live or die.” While I traditionally side with players who want to see game stories affected by their decisions, this negative response completely misses a crucial theme in the series: death and the construction of meaning are processes, not singular events.

Telltale raises the stakes with "Long Road Ahead”, the latest entry into the zombie-themed episodic game series. Nothing is sacred and Telltale makes it abundantly clear -- they will kill everyone you love. Of course, in a world infested with those hungry for human flesh, death is to be expected. In the very first episode, Lee, the game’s protagonist, watches Shawn, a farm-hand, get devoured by zombies breaking through a wooden fence. In Episode 2, one character gets his head smashed in with a cinder-block.

Episode 3 separates itself in that Lee, and therefore the player, has no direct influence on whether these characters live or die. Carly’s death in the latest episode happens suddenly and with very little warning and is completely unavoidable. Similarly, Duck is bitten by a zombie and becomes infected while Lee is distracted by an invading zombie horde. Perhaps most offensive to players with expectations of choice, Katja commits suicide off-screen, too distraught over Duck’s fate to keep living.

Would these deaths have been better if Lee could have stopped them somehow? To be fair, Shawn’s death in the first episode is also pre-determined, but players still make a crucial choice about who to attempt to save, which affects how surrounding characters behave with Lee. Maybe a quick-time-event in which players try to grab the gun away from Lilly (and inevitably fail) would have satiated players more demanding of choice in “Long Road Ahead”. At least it would have mirrored the same dichotomy in the first episode.

Whether or not Lee is able to intervene, the reasons for these characters' deaths are complex. Lilly acts irrationally because she was already in an agitated state, a state enhanced by the death of her father and in all likelihood extreme sleep deprivation. The seeds of Duck’s death were planted long before a merciful bullet takes his life. His death comes as a result of betrayal and team in-fighting. All of the deaths in the game exist within a larger system of cause and effect, all wrapped up in complex relationships.

Indeed, the most important aspect of the deaths in Episode 3 concern their relationship to their repercussions. Will players decide to abandon Lilly on the road? I did. And I am still not sure if it was the right thing to do. With Katjaa and Duck gone, will Kenny’s resentments boil over or vanish in grief? If players chose to end Duck’s life themselves, will this gain Kenny’s favor or brew even more hostility?

Conversations, which make up the majority of player interaction in The Walking Dead, theoretically contribute to long-term relationships between characters. The deaths in Episode 3 convey the importance of human systems over singular events. Meaning is not found in the singular act of deciding another character’s fate, but the process by which Lee relates to these other human beings as the story progresses. In an apocalyptic scenario like this one, Tell Tale expresses that how one lives is far more important than how one dies. Player choice should never spoil this message.

The team almost certainly shifted player expectations intentionally with this latest entry in the series. To cap off these sudden and unavoidable deaths, near the end of the episode players have to decide who to help on board a moving train -- the injured Omid who is running ahead, or the healthy Christa who is falling behind. The decision mirrors the same one players make in Episode 3 between Duck and Shawn.

After a brief tease, both characters make it onboard. Despite the trappings, The Walking Dead has never been about player choice and dichotomies -- at least not in the classical sense. This is a game about systems of human relationships. It is about managing to keep one’s humanity in a world overrun by the dead and maneuvering through a landscape of immense suffering. Deciding who dies has far less meaning than deciding how we move forward with those left behind.

To be a migrant worker in America is to relearn the basic skills of living. Imagine doing that in your 60s and 70s, when you thought you'd be retired.

Nomadland: Surviving America in the Twenty-First Century

Publisher: W. W. Norton
Author: Jessica Bruder
Publication date: 2017-09

There's been much hand-wringing over the state of the American economy in recent years. After the 2008 financial crisis upended middle-class families, we now live with regular media reports of recovery and growth -- as well as rising inequality and decreased social mobility. We ponder what kind of future we're creating for our children, while generally failing to consider who has already fallen between the gaps.

Keep reading... Show less

Very few of their peers surpass Eurythmics in terms of artistic vision, musicianship, songwriting, and creative audacity. This is the history of the seminal new wave group

The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame nominating committee's yearly announcement of the latest batch of potential inductees always generates the same reaction: a combination of sputtering outrage by fans of those deserving artists who've been shunned, and jubilation by fans of those who made the cut. The annual debate over the list of nominees is as inevitable as the announcement itself.

Keep reading... Show less

Barry Lyndon suggests that all violence—wars, duels, boxing, and the like—is nothing more than subterfuge for masculine insecurities and romantic adolescent notions, which in many ways come down to one and the same thing.

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) crystalizes a rather nocturnal view of heterosexual, white masculinity that pervades much of Stanley Kubrick's films: after slithering from the primordial slime, we jockey for position in ceaseless turf wars over land, money, and women. Those wielding the largest bone/weapon claim the spoils. Despite our self-delusions about transcending our simian stirrings through our advanced technology and knowledge, we remain mired in our ancestral origins of brute force and domination—brilliantly condensed by Kubrick in one of the most famous cuts in cinematic history: a twirling bone ascends into the air only to cut to a graphic match of a space station. Ancient and modern technology collapse into a common denominator of possession, violence, and war.

Keep reading... Show less

This book offers a poignant and jarring reminder not just of the resilience of the human spirit, but also of its ability to seek solace in the materiality of one's present.

Marcelino Truong launched his autobiographical account of growing up in Saigon during the Vietnam War with the acclaimed graphic novel Such a Lovely Little War: Saigon 1961-63, originally published in French in 2012 and in English translation in 2016. That book concluded with his family's permanent relocation to London, England, as the chaos and bloodshed back home intensified.

Now Truong continues the tale with Saigon Calling: London 1963-75 (originally published in French in 2015), which follows the experiences of his family after they seek refuge in Europe. It offers a poignant illustration of what life was like for a family of refugees from the war, and from the perspective of young children (granted, Truong's family were a privileged and upper class set of refugees, well-connected with South Vietnamese and European elites). While relatives and friends struggle to survive amid the bombs and street warfare of Vietnam, the displaced narrator and his siblings find their attention consumed by the latest fashion and music trends in London. The book offers a poignant and jarring reminder not just of the resilience of the human spirit, but also of its ability to seek solace in the materiality of one's present.

Keep reading... Show less

Canadian soul singer Elise LeGrow shines on her impressive interpretation of Fontella Bass' classic track "Rescue Me".

Canadian soul singer Elise LeGrow pays tribute to the classic Chicago label Chess Records on her new album Playing Chess, which was produced by Steve Greenberg, Mike Mangini, and the legendary Betty Wright. Unlike many covers records, LeGrow and her team of musicians aimed to make new artistic statements with these songs as they stripped down the arrangements to feature leaner and modern interpretations. The clean and unfussy sound allows LeGrow's superb voice to have more room to roam. Meanwhile, these classic tunes take on new life when shown through LeGrow's lens.

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.