Music

Birds of Chicago: Birds of Chicago

Clearly, this duo have an affinity for ‘70s soft rock, but in a good way, and the pair offers a smooth, country-bluegrass sound that is nice to lie back and listen to, going down as well as a cold beer on a hot, summer's day.


Birds of Chicago

Birds of Chicago

Label: Self-released
US Release Date: 2012-10-02
UK Release Date: Import
Amazon
iTunes

The, yes, partially Chicago-based duo behind Birds of Chicago have a relaxed way with rootsy Americana: some of this, such as the opening track “Trampoline”, could pass for mid-‘70s Eagles, and other bits, such as singer JT Nero’s “Cannonball”, could have beamed in from Rod Stewart’s early ‘70s output, scratchy voice and all. Meanwhile, his cohort, the Vancouver-based Allison Russell, could almost pass for Emmylou Harris from roughly the same period on stunning, towering tracks such as “Before She Goes”, and that’s not when she’s letting her Cajun loose on “San Souci”. Clearly, this duo have an affinity for ‘70s soft rock, but in a good way, and the pair offers a smooth, country-bluegrass sound that is nice to lie back and listen to, going down as well as a cold beer on a hot, summers day.

The slight problem with Birds of Chicago, as a duo, is that Russell has the much more commanding voice of the two, and sings slightly more earnest material. With Nero, alas, Rome goes up in flames as we get trite lyrics and lazy rhymes such as the following from “Moonglow Tapeworm”: “Yeah, I got that moonglow / Yeah, I got that tapeworm / And my stomach burns / From the [Author’s note: ... wait for it ... ] tapeworm.” You don’t say? Coming directly after such a stunning show-stopper as “Before She Goes”, you have to wonder if this paring is about as natural as a Blue Jay and an Oriole becoming fast friends. The strength of the material is clearly lopsided here, which is a bit unfortunate. Had the powers of the vocalists and songwriters been a bit more easily matched, Birds of Chicago would have been as pleasurable as hearing something as familiar and pleasant on the ears as “Take It Easy” on the radio for the umpteenth time. Still, this is pretty nice, particularly when Russell steps up to the mic and into the well-deserved spotlight – particularly on album highlight “Come Morning”, which is about as angelic as they come.

6

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image