Dark Dark Dark: Who Needs Who

Who Needs Who sees Dark Dark Dark exceeding the exceptionally high standards they've set for themselves.

Dark Dark Dark

Who Needs Who

Label: Supply & Demand
US Release Date: 2012-10-02
UK Release Date: 2012-10-02
Label website
Artist website

My first encounter with Dark Dark Dark came courtesy of their Daytrotter series, back when it was still a free service. I still consider their session one of the best that Daytrotter's done and was further won over by the band after seeing them live at the University of Madison in 2009, opening for Why?. Then I started listening to their studio material and none of it grabbed me as effectively as their live material had, though it always impressed. Whatever minor problems plagued their records in the past have been remedied with Who Needs Who, their most recent record, a sprawling display of elegance, refinement, and beauty.

Who Needs Who opens with the track that it's named for, sending stately piano chords cascading out of the speakers. For those who are unfamiliar with Dark Dark Dark's general aesthetic, this is a perfect introduction. There's bits of Beirut added onto a very heavy Regina Spektor influence which ends up equaling something on par with the former and much more fascinating than the latter. The Balkan influence co-exists nicely with classical, Southern Gothic, and a small dash of Calypso. At various points in "Who Needs Who" there are small bursts of each, including one section that manages to highlight them all simultaneously. To say this record gets off on the right foot with that track would be a criminal understatement.

Fortunately Who Needs Who sustains itself in quality, in pacing, and in sequencing, which is more than a lot of record's can say after starting off with a track as powerful as "Who Needs Who". The first step the band takes in dissolving any doubts that things will fall apart is with the fantastic "Tell Me", which finds them dipping into an unexpected shoegaze influence, wisely using it for atmospheric purposes rather than having it be the driving force behind the song. That, of course, goes to Nona Marie's fantastic ability on both vocals and keys. Now, Dark Dark Dark have bared their teeth before but they've never seemed as frighteningly sharp as they do on "Tell Me". That one-two punch of songs constitutes one of 2012's best immediate openings on a record. "Last Time I Saw Joe" keeps things pushing forward and more than matches the records standard of excellence early on.

After the propulsive ending of "Last Time I Saw Joe" comes "Patsy Cline", which slows the tempo with a gorgeous first half that slowly builds into a wonderfully understated climax that breaks for the last chorus, effectively demonstrating the band's enviable songwriting prowess. "Without You", the ensuing track, is the only song on Who Needs Who that takes a while to truly settle into itself. However, the payoff in "Without You" far outweighs the drawbacks of its earlier moments. "How It Went Down" reveals some of Dark Dark Dark's jazzier influences and marks the true point of strength in cohesion for Who Needs Who, the moment where the record as a singular entity seems to be assured of complete unification.

Another intensely strong moment for the record comes in the form of "It's A Secret", which features an incredibly captivating melody and some of Marie's most exquisitely expressive lyrical passages. There's a darker undercurrent propelling "It's A Secret" that only makes it stand out more. Yet, it's restrained enough to not stand out or overwhelm anything surrounding it and works perfectly both contextually and as a standalone song. "It's A Secret" also features one of Who Needs Who's strongest horn arrangement on a record full of them. "Hear Me" continues to delve deeper into the darker undercurrents present on "It's A Secret" and bring the shoegaze influence back at an even more prominent level. Coming after such a gentle song, it hits like a freight train and has the potential to leave you breathless, hanging on to every subtle nuance. Together, they represent the record's second true knockout one-two combination.

Who Needs Who's closing pair of tracks, the Jon Brion-esque "Meet in the Dark" and "The Great Mistake", achieve similar heights as the preceding two tracks, though they're slightly more predictable. They're both meticulously arranged and artfully rendered in structure and feature some intriguing dynamics that most bands operating in this genre aren't willing to try. "Meet in the Dark" has a brief harrowing moment highlighted by distorted guitars and features a few fleeting moments of feedback before settling back into relative quietude, setting up the last track to be either a tranquil and meditative piece or an abrasive blast of piano-punk. Ultimately, the band sticks to their proven strength and delivers one of the most restrained and delicate songs on the record, providing a compelling ending to an utterly worthwhile journey.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.