Overcoming the Hurt: Batgirl #14

Jay Mattson

While the ending to Batgirl #14 is somewhat confusing, I don't mind being left in the dark as to where this tie-in is going…

Batgirl #14

Publisher: DC
Length: 22 pages
Writer: Gail Simone, Ed Benes, Daniel Sampere
Price: $3.99
Publication Date: 2013-01

Last month's "Death of the Family" prologue issue of Batgirl was a pretty big letdown. It was marketed as a starting point for the Batman crossover event, but contained only a small lead-in to the Joker’s return at the very end of the issue. Overall, the issue wasn’t branded well and it led to a lot of frustrated buyers who thought they were getting an actual “Death of the Family” story. I'd have to include myself on that list. Of course, Barbara Gordon has a deeply personal connection to the Joker, meaning her stories should be some of the darkest. Fortunately, Gail Simone more than makes up for the Joker’s absence last month by bringing him front and center in Batgirl #14.

The Batman family (basically) kept their continuity intact in the New 52--albeit a little more time compressed than before the reboot--which means Barbara was shot and paralyzed by the Joker some years prior. On that day, the Joker won because fear beat out justice. We’ve seen throughout the New 52 run of Batgirl how much Barbara clings to and attempts to reconcile her past. Overcoming her paralysis was part of the bigger picture of how she needed to overcome her fear of the Joker. Obviously, she’s been back in her bat-suit for a while, but the past seems to always be on Barbara’s mind.

At the end of Batgirl #13, the Joker kidnapped Barbara’s mother in the middle of the two ladies having a phone conversation. It was a shocking moment; one that Batgirl #14 reveals wasn’t so different from when the Joker came after Barbara. A mysterious caller who Barbara assumes, at first, is the Big J himself simply having his sadistic fun, explains the similarities in the Joker’s crimes from then and now. After a while of following the caller’s directions, though, it becomes increasingly apparent (to the reader) that it is not the Joker on the line with Barbara, but in fact some malicious third party intent on leading Babs right into the Joker’s hands. The identity of the caller is important because it sets up the next arc for Batgirl after it wraps up with “Death of the Family”.

The Joker is more terrifying now than he’s ever been in the past. Seriously. His face skin is stretched over his actual face in a constant smile, his eyes each have starkly different kinds of crazy behind them, and his new repairman outfit means he could use just about any tool on that belt as a lethal weapon. As we move through “Death of the Family”, each writer attached to the event is going to have to give readers a little more about the Joker, whether it be what he was doing for the past year, what his current motives seem to be, or what his plans include to destroy the lives of the Bat family.

This month’s Batman revealed that the Joker knows the identities of every Batman ally, and Batgirl #14 reveals how much disdain Joker has for the familial aspects of Batman’s relationships. To Joker, they’re all “…(c)lutching at his cape, drowning him with (their) empathy and (their) compassion.” Joker sees Gotham as Batman’s kingdom, and himself as the Dark Knight’s court jester, intent on making his king laugh by any means necessary. But in this twisted metaphor, making his lord ‘laugh’ means Joker must make Batman’s world chaotic.

The final sequence is a bit confusing and disturbing at the same time. Honestly, it doesn’t make much sense in it’s own context, but after getting totally sucked in by Barbara’s attempt at rescuing her mother. I’m confident Batgirl #15 next month will explain the Joker’s actions. And really, on some weird level, I almost like being totally in the dark about where this tie-in arc is going.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.