'Yardbirds: Making Tracks' Will, Indeed, Have You Making Tracks

What happens when a legendary band reheats itself for a 20-year cycle of touring with new members who aren't gritty enough to get the grit? No, I ask you.


Making Tracks: On Tour 2010-2012

Label: MVD
US Release date: 2012-12-12

Those Yardbirds. First formed circa 1963, the band became one of the most influential of the British Invasion bands if not one of the best selling on the American shores. Fusing elements of American blues––which was sweeping and swaying all over Great Britain at the time––with the best of rock ‘n’ roll, these cats were as dirty if not dirtier than the Stones and certainly came with a better pedigree––Jimmy Page, Jeff Beck, and Eric Clapton all passed through the ranks and the group managed to find a more convincing and serrated take on psychedelic sounds with tracks such as “Heart Full of Soul” and “Happenings Ten Years Time Ago”––even ahead of The Beatles and aforementioned anti-moss gatherers.

By 1968, the group was over and Jimmy Page recruited a new group of lads including Robert Plant and John Bonham to tour as The New Yardbirds before shedding the moniker entirely and seeing his new outfit become you-know-who. The intervening years were not entirely kind to the Yardbirds. Never an albums band the group’s singles, although powerful and influential––without these fellas there would be no Aerosmith and KISS’s rougher edges would have been much duller––became ephemeral to many in the rock market.

Everyone knew the story of the band probably better than the band's actual music. Which is too bad, because there are some real zinger’s in the group’s oeuvre. “Train Kept A Rollin’” ain’t the kind of thing your average lad can whip up and “Over Under Sideways Down” remains unparalleled in its pre-emptive punch and pow. Sure, there were covers by the score and the group never really found an identifiable Jagger-Richards/Lennon-McCartney formula on which to build its house. No matter. You can’t take nothin’ away from that first era and you’d be almost downright damned foolish to try and add to it.

Yet the band has existed once more since 1992, steered by original rhythm guitarist Chris Dreja and drummer Jim McCarty, plus an endless parade of mostly faceless players. Vocalist Keith Relf died tragically in the 1970s and the hotshot guitarists who moved through the ranks are, er, unavailable. But musicians have to eat and, really, what could be the harm in putting together a pack of players, calling it Yardbirds, and taking the music to the streets?

The outfit coughed up a new record in 2003 with a guest spot from Jeff Beck, although the material was mostly old stuff reheated for the digital age with new players and a couple of new tracks that were not up to the Birds of yore standards also got paraded out. That release (called Birdland) mustered a few sympathetic ears and some even flocked to hear the reconstituted unit live and thought highly enough to pass the word along.

So, here were are now, round about 2010 when some of the tracks on this DVD set were recorded (other material comes from 2011 and 2012) and nothing’s really gotten better. It’s a good old band playing at being a good old band with some lads in the ranks whose mothers weren’t born when “Shapes of Things” first showed up.

It’s not that the lads are bad or that the performances are spotty, it’s just that it doesn’t have the gas. The elder members are too much in the background and the new kids are too much in the forefront. And, if you didn’t catch it its more subtle iteration, this sounds like a covers band having a go at being Yardbirds for an evening. McCarty and Dreja, bless ‘em, have a noble goal in mind here, no doubt, but that doesn’t matter. It’s all a little depressing to watch and while the Birds certainly have an audience willing to hear material such as “The Nazz Are Blue”, this writer isn’t part of that group.

One disc is taken up by live performance whilst the other consists of a tour documentary, an interview with Dreja, an interview with McCarty, a few bonus cuts, performances from the Jim McCarty Band and one or two things you really don’t care about. If you want Yardbirds, drop some coin on past material.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.