You Can't Escape Your Past -- or Your Future: 'Looper'

Rian Johnson's Looper owes as much to Shakespeare as it does to classic sci-fi: if we know our fate, everything we do to prevent it will only succeed in causing it to come crashing down on us.


Rated: R
Director: Rian Johnson
Cast: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Bruce Willis, Emily Blunt, Jeff Daniels
Length: 119 minutes
Studio: Sony
Year: 2012
Distributor: Sony
MPAA Rating: R
Release date: 2012-12-28

It must be difficult to know your fate. Like Greek heroes of the ancient past, preordained to fulfill some prophecy, Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s Joe sees the man he will become and tries to stop it. He has his own dreams and desires, and seeing that they don’t come true sets him off. It’s his life, not his future self’s.

Bruce Willis’ Joe is older, balder and wiser. He’s survived his reckless youth, knows the mistakes he made and Young Joe will, and tries to set his younger self on the right path. When Old Joe is sent back from the future to be assassinated by his younger self, he is prepared. He knows his self, something young Joe does not.

Writer-director Rian Johnson’s Looper is a well-structured time-travel thriller. In addition to the two Joe’s, the plot revolves around a woman and her child, a society of futuristic hitmen, a socialist America and a mysterious killer who’s offing the Loopers years after they’ve retired. It’s well structured in its own internal logic puzzle, playing with the rules of time-travel set by standards like Back to the Future, Willis’ own 12 Monkeys, and most notably the movie that inspired it, Chris Marker’s La Jetee.

However, it’s not the time travel but the characters that help this film standout. Or rather, the character Joe played by both Willis and Levitt.

Presenting the same character over a 30-year time frame is nothing new; but putting both iterations of that character, the man that is and the man that will be, presents interesting possibilities. We often think what we would tell our younger selves. How would we instruct them to avoid the pitfalls that we fell into? At the same time, however, it's those pitfalls that have made us who we are. We are those life experiences.

And how would our younger selves react? When we were younger, we had our own conceptions of who we wanted to be. Nothing would stand in our way. Seeing a broken down version of his self would possibly only make one struggle harder to avoid that path.

Despite their differences, the path sought by both Young and Old Joe revolves around love. It’s the carrot dangling over their head, always just out of reach, at times unknowingly and knowingly determining their actions. This defining trait is clearly demonstrated from Young Joe's relationship with the prostitute Suzie and her child, to his later relationship with Emily Blunt's telekinetic Sara and her son, and Old Joe's eventual discovery of his own true love. These conceptions of love both define and trap the characters in an endless cycle of give and take.

The performance by Willis is appropriately desperate, a man who has teetered on the edge for most of his life and wishes to get back to the solid ground that’s been pulled out from under him. He’s tragically frantic, if not to save his own self but the man that will become here. Levitt’s take on the character is both a turn that’s recognizable as Willis but also a man with his own youthful aspirations. The prosthetics may help Levitt physically look like the older actor, but it’s his performance as the thinking, every man action hero with a soft core that recalls the earlier roles that made Willis’ famous.

It’s a point that is labored over in both the DVD commentary and EPK featurette. While neither belies anything earth shattering about the movie, both serve to underline the intricacies Johnson put into the screenplay, an attention to detail and desire to tell interesting genre stories that has actors apparently lining up to get parts in his features.

This is only his third feature, the other two being the teen-noir Brick with Levitt and the too-clever-for-its-own-good Brother’s Bloom. The confusion manifested by the latter presents an interesting point, as the ending of Looper goes out of its way to make sure the audience is caught up with the story. It’s not an issue addressed in the commentary, but something Johnson was definitely thinking about while creating this piece.

The transformation of the familiar to the unknown is better reinforced in a series of extras discussing the sound design. Composer Nathan Johnson details how found sounds such as treadmills, doorstoppers and industrial fans were mutated to create the atmospheric score. Household plastics, wood and metals were used to create a digital drum kit that mirrored Joe’s fractured America. Additional extras include deleted scenes and an animated trailer.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

Electronic music is one of the broadest-reaching genres by design, and 2017 highlights that as well as any other year on record. These are the 20 best albums.

20. Vitalic - Voyager (Citizen)

Pascal Arbez-Nicolas (a.k.a. Vitalic) made waves in the French Touch electro-house scene with his 2005 debut, OK Cowboy, which had a hard-hitting maximalist sound, but several albums later, Voyager finds him launching into realms beyond at his own speed. The quirky, wallflower vocals and guitar snippets employed throughout Voyager drop a funk that brings to mind WhoMadeWho or Matthew Dear if they had disco-pop injected between their toes. "Levitation" is as pure a slice of dance floor motivation as theoretically possible, a sci-fi gunfight with a cracking house beat sure to please his oldest fans, yet the album-as-form is equally effective in its more contemplative moments, like when Miss Kitten's vocals bring an ethereal dispassion to "Hans Is Driving" to balance out its somber vocoder or the heartfelt cover of "Don't Leave Me Now" by Supertramp. Voyager may infect you with a futuristic form of Saturday Night Fever, but afterwards, it gives you a hearty dose of aural acetaminophen to break it. - Alan Ranta

Keep reading... Show less

It's just past noon on a Tuesday, somewhere in Massachusetts and Eric Earley sounds tired.

Since 2003, Earley's band, Blitzen Trapper, have combined folk, rock and whatever else is lying around to create music that manages to be both enigmatic and accessible. Since their breakthrough album Furr released in 2008 on Sub Pop, the band has achieved critical acclaim and moderate success, but they're still some distance away from enjoying the champagne lifestyle.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.