Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance

Whether you're looking for conspiracy theories about memetic war propaganda or you simply want to slice a helicopter into a thousand pieces, Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance delivers.

Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance

Publisher: Konami Digital Entertainment, Inc.
Rated: Mature
Players: 1
Price: $59.99
Platforms: Playstation 3 (reviewed), XBox 360
Developer: PlatinumGames
Release date: 2013-02-19

If you couldn't already tell by its title, Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance is a pretty absurd game. It's a spinoff of Solid Snake's story, but it bounces between the corny sight gags and self-serious treatises on morality that define the Metal Gear universe. The difference is that Revengeance was developed by PlatniumGames, a studio as obsessed with speed and combat as Kojima studios is with stealth. There are some things around the periphery that detract from the game's otherwise excellent sword-based fighting system, but the core mechanics remain fittingly sharp.

For those of us actually interested in the baffling maze that is Metal Gear lore, the game fits in nicely with the broader series. Revengeance takes place after Metal Gear Solid 4 in a world struggling to re-calibrate in the absence of the Patriots and their control of the global war economy. Again, don't worry if that last sentence didn't make any sense; the story is by no means crucial to enjoying the game. For fans however, there is plenty of talk about memes, cybernetic soldiers, and private military corporations. As always, villains deliver soliloquies about morality and politics during fights, and there are plenty of references to the ways historical conflicts have shaped the world. References to terrorism and the impact of September 11th on the American psyche can get a little heavy handed, but the game (like most Metal Gear games) still raises some valid points. There aren't many game stories so openly critical of U.S. militarism and politics.

Of course, what the game says and what you do in it are often two different things. While the authored narrative is about the pitfalls of imperialism, the moment to moment gameplay is about slicing things into as many things as possible. I mean that literally. The game keeps track of how many pieces enemies become, and you are awarded points for more effective fighting. Raiden's amazing moves were mostly confined to cut scenes in MGS 4, and Platinum does an outstanding job with giving the player control in Reveangence.

Fighting is comprised of basic light, heavy, and secondary attacks that can be combined in numerous ways to launch enemies into the air and leave them open to a finishing move. The left shoulder button activates a "bullet time" mode in which enemies slow down and you use the two analog sticks to unleash a flurry of cuts from strategic angles. Depending on your timing and your aiming skill, limbs, torsos, and heads can be methodically lopped off in order to trigger health and stamina-replenishing crescendos. As was the case in Platinum's other games like Bayonetta and Vanquish, the fighting system requires and rewards those who seek technical mastery.

Enemy groups and visual effects give every encounter a feeling of controlled chaos. Getting the best scores means thinking quickly, but also tactically, as you control the flow of battle. Unsurprisingly, the game is fast. Ironically, the only framerate hitches that I experienced were during "walk-and-talk" radio conversations meant to expound on the plot. When the action ramps up, the barriers between the screen, the controller, and your hands seem to melt away.

It's a shame then that the game is marred by a few key deficiencies that make learning these systems cumbersome. When it comes to learning how the play the game, Revengeance doesn't do you any favors. The tutorial quickly tells you how to do a finishing move, how to parry, and how free form blade mode works, and then dumps you into the game. Without any enforced practice or a gradual ramp up, the first boss initially seems insurmountable. I can easily imagine most people would give up then and there rather than take the time to teach themselves how to fight, and I'd have a hard time blaming them.

There are several of these harsh difficulty spikes throughout the game (including one that makes the final boss an extremely frustrating experience). It's as if the game assumes that you've been improving rather than falling into stale fighting habits, but it never really checks to see if that's the case before throwing a boss at you. It's a crude approach to difficulty that forces improvement without really doing much to guide the player. Some might say this is simply a design philosophy, but I'd bet those would be the same types who love Demon's Souls.

And then there are the things that are much more difficult to defend on philosophical grounds. There are several instant-fail quicktime event sequences that feel tacked on and completely out of place. The basic fighting system is about testing and improvising, whereas these sequences are about finding a single correct path and never deviating from it. The upgrade system and UI are also needlessly cumbersome. Purchasing single use, perpetual move upgrades doesn't actually activate them. They must be equipped for some weird reason. Secondary weapons like grenades and missiles are far less useful than the normal melee weapons. Additionally, they require you to come to a complete standstill in order to use them, which seems like the exact thing you wouldn't want to do if you were a cybernetic ninja.

All of this means that Revengeance is a blast for people looking for the next highly technical character-action based game and folks looking for another trip into the twisted world of Metal Gear, but it probably won't win many converts. There are some bizarrely funny moments (apparently even robots have trouble figuring out which side of the USB drive is "up") and plenty of systemic depth for action fans. Despite a few dull spots, Revengeance delivers the strange post-modernism that defines Metal Gear and the precise action that defines a PlatinumGames title.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.