Music

Counterbalance No. 118: Simon & Garfunkel's 'Bridge Over Troubled Water'

Like the 118th most acclaimed album of all time, Counterbalance will lay us down. Sail on, Silver Girl...


Simon & Garfunkel

Bridge Over Troubled Water

US Release: 1970-01-26
UK Release: 1970-01-26
Label: Columbia
Amazon
iTunes

Klinger: In the two-plus years we've been embarked on this fool's crusade to discuss the most acclaimed albums of all-time (as compiled by the mathmagician over at the aptly named and highly addictive Acclaimed Music website), we've covered more than a few break-up albums, those wrenching chronicles of love gone wrong and valiant attempts to pick up the pieces in the aftermath. I'm pretty sure, though, that Simon & Garfunkel's 1970 blockbuster Bridge Over Troubled Water is our first LP that focuses primarily on the break-up of a professional relationship -- and certainly the only one to do so before the split is even officially announced. But references to Paul and Art's impending dissolution are scattered all throughout the record in one form or another.

Like a lot of people, I've headed back into Bridge Over Troubled Water on those occasions when romance goes pear-shaped, so maybe that's why it took me a while to realize that so much of it was based on a different kind of loss. But it's also such a big-sounding album, with its lush orchestrations and slick production, that it's easy to lose sight of the intimacy that's at its core.

Mendelsohn: There is definitely a push and pull to this record that epitomizes the struggles between Simon and Garfunkel as they started to go in different directions, personally, professionally, and, maybe most important for me, musically. I never really viewed Bridge Over Troubled Water as a break up album, although, as you noted, the strains of dissolving artistic relationship is couched in every nook and cranny of the hushed tones and the overt bombast that makes up one of the best-selling records of all time.

Klinger: Yes, buried way deep into the nooks and crannies. So much so that it's easy to miss some of them. I only recently learned that right at the end of "So Long Frank Lloyd Wright" you can hear Simon deliver a heartfelt "So long, Artie!" to his departing friend. And that in turn suggests a new layer of meaning to the lyrics (Did Paul just refer to himself as the architect? Did Art realize this when he sang it?)


Plus I had a head-slapping moment when I finally figured out that the "Tom" at the beginning of "The Only Living Boy in New York" refers to Art, the Tom to Paul's Jerry from their early years together. (I know, duh.)

Mendelsohn: Well, I'll be a monkey's uncle. Now that song makes a lot more sense, especially when you apply it to Garfunkel, who was spending half of his time on his acting career.

Klinger: True, Art was heading out to act in Mike Nichols’ adaptation of Catch-22 (so his “part will go fine”). It turns out that there was originally supposed to be a role for Simon as well, but it was cut from the script. Garfunkel recently went on record as saying that this was the final nail in the S&G coffin—and that we are free to infer that Mike Nichols is at least partly to blame.


Mendelsohn: As fun as it is to parse Simon's lyrical intentions, I was always a bit fascinated by the jump in songwriting that Paul Simon made on this record. Up to this point in their career, Paul and Art had been pushing a folk-ified version of the Everly Brothers. Not that there is anything wrong with that—I am a huge fan of Don and Phil, but you don't get from something like "Homeward Bound" to "You Can Call Me Al", without a little work and exploration.

Bridge Over Troubled Water acts as that sign post, not only showing Simon a way to become a better songwriter but pushing him in the direction that would lead to an album like Graceland. The Everly Brothers influence is still all over this record—I mean, they cover "Bye Bye Love", but on the other side of the spectrum is Simon's first steps toward exploring and incorporating world music with "El Condor Pasa". It also sets up Simon's long running tradition of prodigiously "borrowing" music for his own uses and then sometimes getting sued for it, but then imitation is the greatest form of flattery, isn't it?

Klinger: Well, there is a good amount of exploration on Bridge Over Troubled Water, but I think it also has a certain almost bombastic quality in places that makes me miss their simpler efforts (for the record, I'm a Sounds of Silence man myself—¡Viva gloom!). The orchestrations on the title track, the horn arrangements on "Keep the Customer Satisfied", even the strings at the end of "The Boxer" have a weird tendency to take me out of the songs themselves. Don't get me wrong, I love all three of those, but there are times when the album almost starts to sound like a Ray Conniff record in its borderline overproduced feel. Still, the sheer number of hits—and the sense that this was the last we'd be hearing from the duo -- are likely what's placed Bridge Over Troubled Water first among their albums.


Mendelsohn: You are not alone in feeling a bit put off by the overproduction. I too find myself either gravitating toward early Simon & Garfunkel's dulcet folk stylings over the Technicolor sound blasts that pop up in odd spaces on Bridge Over Troubled Water. But as soon as I say that, I remember how much I love "Baby Driver", and how much the production, the addition of Simon making those little car noises and the fantastic horn break, makes that song pop off the wax. If anything, I think it is a testament about this duo's ability to move in two seemingly different directions, reveling in the over-produced bombast and then turning around in the next breath and tempering that with a steely restraint that never feels forced—well, except maybe that part in "The Only Living Boy in New York" where they fade the backing track a little too hard and a little too fast. Other than that, can you point out any flaws?

Klinger: Well, apart from the quibblings I've already mentioned I can't think of too much. Who knows, maybe including "Cuba Si, Nixon No", the song that escalated many of the tensions that were bubbling under the surface during the latter days of Simon and Garfunkel's partnership, might have tilted the album one way or another.

The story goes that Simon was keen to record the song but Garfunkel fought hard to keep it off the record. I'd been hearing that story for years and always assumed, based on the title, that it was some overly earnest "protest" song that probably sounded like "El Condor Pasa" strident, college-freshman denunciations of the Nixon administration. Turns out, based on this live version, that it's a punchy little Chuck Berry-styled number. Combining that with other up-tempo tracks like "Baby Driver" and "Keep the Customer Satisfied" would have made Bridge Over Troubled Water far and away the rockingest Simon & Garfunkel album in the catalog ("rocking" being an extremely relative term where Simon & Garfunkel is concerned, of course.)


Mendelsohn: I'm going to disagree slightly with that but only so I can poke at semantics for a minute or two. The only real thing that makes Bridge Over Troubled Water rock harder than any other Simon & Garfunkel records is the simple fact that they piled on a bit more production. Here's the thing about most of Simon & Garfunkel's catalog: most of it rocks—at least it would if they weren't plucking their guitars softly and whispering into the microphone. And I know, that sounds silly but they wrote some great songs that would rock (and do) with the simple addition of an electric guitar, and maybe a rock 'n' roll howl or two.

But I think that was the idea. Simon and Garfunkel were writing rock 'n' roll within the constraints that was Simon & Garfunkel. There are only a couple tracks on this record that don't have the innate ability to rock and they bookend a group of songs that could have rocked much more in a different place and time. That's the beauty of Simon & Garfunkel's work, especially when it comes to Bridge Over Troubled Water. Paul and Art were treading this fine line, walking a tight rope as the winds of change whipped around them and they persevered long enough to create an indelible work of art that set them apart from the rest of the field at a time when rock was stumbling headlong into hard-charging excess of the 1970s.

Klinger: That's true—it is a short jog from relatively basic folk chord progressions to rock 'n' roll, and I think that's partly why we can look at Bridge Over Troubled Wateras a long last look around before Paul and Artie closed up shop. You have the simpler numbers that reference their past (the cover of "Bye Bye Love" most notably) mixed with the global experimentation and complex chords that marked Simon's songwriting going forward and helped set the scene for the singer-songwriter movement that was to come. Like I said before, Bridge Over Troubled Water isn't my favorite Simon & Garfunkel album, but it might be the most representative of its time. Plus the cover photo makes it look like Garfunkel has a big gaucho mustache. I am very much in favor of that.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image