Reviews

'The Call': Good Girls Fight Back

We get it. The killer is brutal. And he's psychotic. And he's unbelievably strong too. Must be the freeze-framey adrenalin.


The Call

Director: Brad Anderson
Cast: Halle Berry, Abigail Breslin, Morris Chestnut, Michael Eklund, Michael Imperioli
Rated: R
Studio: Sony Pictures
Year: 2013
US date: 2013-03-15 (General release)
Website
Trailer

"Call me a bitch." Casey (Abigail Breslin) shakes her head. "Okay, just say the word," her friend Autumn (Ella Rae Peck) presses. But no, Casey doesn't like "that word." Blond and lovely and careless, the girls make their way through a Los Angeles mall, Autumn repeatedly distracted by her two phones, one a prepaid bestowed on her by a possessive new boyfriend: "He just wants to keep track of you," Casey observes, rolling her eyes.

It turns out that keeping track can be used for good and ill, as all cellphone users know. Following the two girls into a fast food restaurant, The Call needs only a few deft minutes of jostled, obstructed frames to set up the good, sensible girl who will be in trouble. At the same time, the film cuts back and forth between Casey and her good, sensible rescuer, a former 911 operator named Jordan (Halle Berry), who, following the loss of a caller to a serial killer, is now taking prescription anti-anxiety pills and training new operators ("My daddy told me the hardest part about being a cop," she says by way of over-explaining her trauma, "is knowing you might be difference between somebody living and somebody dying"). As Jordan walks her trainees through the "hive," an impressively outfitted floor full operators and high-techy monitors, Casey walks to her car in the parking lot, a stalkerish camera increasing your own anxiety.

You're not surprised when Casey is assaulted by an average-looking white guy who keeps his face hidden (Michael Eklund), when she's knocked out by chloroform and trapped inside the trunk of a car. But still, the film -- for a good half hour, anyway -- develops a decent tension by cutting between these two girls in confined frames. Casey's ordeal is plain enough: fish-eye lenses show her inside the dark trunk, the cellphone barely lighting her terrified face. Jordan appears in tight frames as well, the huge hive space seeming to shrink around her as her interaction with Casey appears to shut down all other business in the 911 center: everyone in her wheely-chaired vicinity is focused on her, as is her boyfriend Paul (Morris Chestnut), a cop who takes up the pursuit of the killer's car, which Casey helpful describes by color and number of doors.

The crosscutting among scenes feels hectic but also coherent, as Jordan talks Casey into a slightly reduced state of panic: "What else is in the trunk?" Jordan asks (an exceedingly helpful can of paint, it turns out). "Good girl," she tells her more than once, "Good girl." Can she kick out a taillight? What's her favorite movie? When is her birthday? On learning that Casey's a Capricorn, Jordan claims to be one too. "We're both fighters," she contends. And so they'll fight through this thing together.

Thus The Call introduces a theme that's familiar to viewers of director Brad Anderson's previous psychological thrillers, each a story of internal descent manifested in unnerving corollary images. As both Casey and Jordan fight through this nightmare, at once together and existentially apart, they find in themselves and each other a strength that's necessarily born of rage and fear. Both good girls, both victimized, they come to achieve remarkable feats, aggressive, desperate, and violent.

This script, however, is less impressionistic, more conventional, than The Machinist, Transsiberian, and Session 9. Here the investigation of psyches is increasingly unfocused, such that Casey's torment -- so ready to be vivid -- is cluttered rather than clarified by Jordan's too-explanatory flashbacks to the other call from a blond girl victim, the one that opens the film and briefly renders Jordan unable to take calls. And both the girls' shifting sensibilities, their horrific new comprehensions of the world around them, are encumbered by the killer's utterly hackneyed and preposterous background.

Access to his tragedy doesn’t make the killer any more frightening or effective as a plot device (which is his lot, after all). Shots of his sweaty face and icy blue eyes and contorted grimace tend toward overkill, as it were. And observing him attack anyone who questions him during his conspicuously long drive to his scary hideout (predictably appointed with straps and chains and sharp utensils) only prolongs the inevitable, literally, when blurred step-freeze-framey shots capture blood splatters or twisted mouths. We get it. He's brutal. And he's psychotic. And he's unbelievably strong too. Must be the freeze-framey adrenalin.

Here, as ever, the killer's atrocities drive the (women's) revenge. This revenge takes a few visual forms, including clumsy expository shots where Jordan is framed alongside signs of her goodness, behind a huge 911 emblem or in front of an American flag. This last comes after she's left the hive and wandered -- there's no better word for it -- toward the killer's lair out in the boonies, without backup, without a weapon, without a cellphone signal. The film asks for this problem, when Casey loses her cellphone and so you're set up to anticipate the girls coming together in the same physical space.

Here Casey and Jordan share a descent, partly literal (a hole in the ground) and mostly psychological, as each sorts out how to "fight" the monster who -- despite and because of his personal backstory -- is more symptomatic than individual. That's not to say the film presents all men evil or destructive. It is to say that, as this one man's trauma makes him sick and gruesome, the women's trauma transforms them, and you, so that their fighting back seems inspired and invigorating. Put it this way: now educated and abused, good girl Casey no longer has a problem with bad language.

5

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

Electronic music is one of the broadest-reaching genres by design, and 2017 highlights that as well as any other year on record. These are the 20 best albums.


20. Vitalic - Voyager (Citizen)

Pascal Arbez-Nicolas (a.k.a. Vitalic) made waves in the French Touch electro-house scene with his 2005 debut, OK Cowboy, which had a hard-hitting maximalist sound, but several albums later, Voyager finds him launching into realms beyond at his own speed. The quirky, wallflower vocals and guitar snippets employed throughout Voyager drop a funk that brings to mind WhoMadeWho or Matthew Dear if they had disco-pop injected between their toes. "Levitation" is as pure a slice of dance floor motivation as theoretically possible, a sci-fi gunfight with a cracking house beat sure to please his oldest fans, yet the album-as-form is equally effective in its more contemplative moments, like when Miss Kitten's vocals bring an ethereal dispassion to "Hans Is Driving" to balance out its somber vocoder or the heartfelt cover of "Don't Leave Me Now" by Supertramp. Voyager may infect you with a futuristic form of Saturday Night Fever, but afterwards, it gives you a hearty dose of aural acetaminophen to break it. - Alan Ranta


Keep reading... Show less
Film

Hitchcock, 'Psycho', and '78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene'

Alfred Hitchock and Janet Leigh on the set of Psycho (courtesy of Dogwoof)

"... [Psycho] broke every taboo you could possibly think of, it reinvented the language of film and revolutionised what you could do with a story on a very precise level. It also fundamentally and profoundly changed the ritual of movie going," says 78/52 director, Alexandre O. Philippe.

The title of Alexandre O. Philippe's 78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene (2017) denotes the 78 set-ups and the 52 cuts across a full week of shooting for Psycho's (1960) famous shower scene. Known for The People vs. George Lucas (2010), The Life and Times of Paul the Psychic Octopus (2012) and Doc of the Dead (2014), Philippe's exploration of a singular moment is a conversational one, featuring interviews with Walter Murch, Peter Bogdanovich, Guillermo del Toro, Jamie Lee Curtis, Osgood Perkins, Danny Elfman, Eli Roth, Elijah Wood, Bret Easton Ellis, Karyn Kusama, Neil Marshall, Richard Stanley and Marli Renfro, body double for Janet Leigh.

Keep reading... Show less

Mary Poppins, Mrs. Gamp, Egyptian deities, a Japanese umbrella spirit, and a supporting cast of hundreds of brollies fill Marion Rankine's lively history.

"What can go up a chimney down but can't go down a chimney up?" Marion Rankine begins her wide-ranging survey of the umbrella and its significance with this riddle. It nicely establishes her theme: just as umbrellas undergo, in the everyday use of them, a transformation, so too looking at this familiar, even forgettable object from multiple perspectives transforms our view of it.

Keep reading... Show less
7

Those who regard the reclusive Argerich as one of the world's two or three greatest living pianists—classical or otherwise—would not have left the concert hall disillusioned.

In a staid city like Washington, D.C., too many concert programs still stick to the basics. An endless litany of Rachmaninoff and Tchaikovsky concerti clog the schedules and parades of overeager virtuosi seem unwilling to vary their repertoire for blasé D.C. concertgoers. But occasionally you encounter a concert that refreshes your perspective of the familiar. The works presented at The Kennedy Center on 25 October 2017 might be stalwarts of 20th century repertoire, but guest conductor Antonio Pappano, leading the Orchestra dell'Accademia Nazionale di Santa Cecilia, reminded us how galvanizing the canonical can still be. Though grandiose executions of Respighi's The Fountains of Rome and The Pines of Rome were the main event, the sold-out crowd gathered to see Martha Argerich perform one of her showpieces, Prokofiev's Third Piano Concerto. Those who regard the reclusive Argerich as one of the world's two or three greatest living pianists—classical or otherwise—would not have left the concert hall disillusioned.

Keep reading... Show less
9
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image