Film

Director Spotlight: Ken Loach: The Wind That Shakes the Barley

On the occasion of his newest film, IFC's The Angels' Share, Statuesque highlights some of iconic UK director Ken Loach's best and brightest contributions to cinema. Today Statuesque looks back at Cannes-winner The Wind That Shakes the Barley...


The Wind That Shakes the Barley

Director: Ken Loach
Cast: Cillian Murphy, Liam Cunningham, Padraic Delaney
Studio: UK Film Council, Pathé Distribution
US Release Date: 2006-06-23

Perhaps Ken Loach’s most well known film, the 2006 international hit The Wind That Shakes the Barley could also be seen as his most ambitious. Set during the Irish War of Independence and then the Irish Civil War, Loach’s film is an unequivocally substantial story for locals and foreigners alike. There are gunfights, high-level government meetings, and plenty of other sets, characters, and actions that many would picture requiring a big budget.

Yet the director known for his hard-and-fast shooting style keeps his methods intact, and the picture benefits all the more from his approach. It helps that Paul Laverty’s touching script focuses on two brothers who become fed up with the crown’s oppression. Laverty and Loach, long-term collaborators who the latter described as “filmmakers” above all else, find the intimate parts of the story and maximize them in a way that conveys both the national and familial consequences.

Certainly aided by a fine performance from Cillian Murphy, Loach’s film feels deeply personal. The director has been telling stories focusing on western European problems for decades, but here he’s dealing with more than metaphor-laden fiction. These wars really happened even if the brothers didn’t exist exactly as they do on screen. The discussions of the movement’s goals are just as riveting as the heartbreaking battle scenes. This couldn’t have happened without the soft touch of the writer and director. Laverty and Loach honor the movement’s ideals while rightly refusing to choose a side once Ireland—and it citizen opinion—splits.

Loach’s part in the social realism movement may have reached its peak with The Wind That Shakes the Barley. Not only does the story focus on a rebellion started to help the working class of Ireland overcome oppression from an upper class British regime. Not only was it made as an independent production with a strong foothold in realism. Not only did a director famous for successfully propagating both the style and ideals of each movement helm it. It also earned Loach the highest recognition of his career.

In 2006, there was an overabundance of high-level films competing for the Palme d’Or at the French film festival. Big names behind the camera who had made big hits internationally already were competing for Cannes’ top prize. Pedro Almodovar was there with Volver. Sofia Coppola premiered Marie Antoinette, her follow-up to Lost In Translation. Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu was even there with his Brad Pitt-starring, eventual Best Picture nominee (likely runner-up) Babel.

Then there was Ken Loach, a respected artist whose films were festival favorites but box office poison. Loach had been nominated for the award seven times prior and never won. He was even given an honorary award two years earlier, the equivalent of Oscar’s lifetime achievement award that is both a recognition of what you’ve done and what you were unable to do (actually win). Could he and his little movie from Ireland really compete with the marketing savvy of the big Hollywood studio, not to mention the budgets provided by them? Absolutely. The Wind That Shakes the Barley took down the big dogs to win the Palme d’Or in a symbolic statement even the most money-hungry studio executive had to appreciate.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image