'When Gadgets Betray Us' Betrays Readers with Fear and Few Answers

Robert Vamosi conducts a thorough enough survey of technological threat and danger lore, but he does little to help readers navigate the landscape, and tells them even less about meaningful actions they can take to mitigate risks.

Publisher: Basic
Author: Robert Vamosi
Price: $16.99
Format: Paperback
When Gadgets Betray Us: The Dark Side of Our Infatuation With New Technologies
Length: 240 pages
Publication date: 2013-02

I am typing this review on a Windows 8 notebook computer as squall lines stream into Seattle, alternating darkness and downpours with hints of sunlight. To track the storms, I just gave permission to identify my precise location. On the map, a dot now appears exactly where I sit.

Author Robert Vamosi, progenitor of When Gadgets Betray Us, would not condone this activity. I however, want to see the rain echo over my home and telling where I live is the price of that precision.’s advertising people may find my location revelation good fodder for their targeted ad algorithm, but I seriously doubt the company, or anyone monitoring my WiFi network (which happens to be encrypted, BTW) would derive much value from knowledge about my storm tracking habits.

If, however, you are paranoid about people being out to get you in the digital world, Vamosi reminds you that paranoia is only an affliction if it isn’t real. And for Vamosi everyone should be paranoid about their trust in gadgets. Whether our GPS leads us astray or malicious hackers discover our garage door frequencies, it’s pretty clear, these things can be trusted.

Vamosi leaves few digital stones unturned when looking for reasons people should fear their technology. TV remotes to hack a hotel accounting systems, public WiFi to gain access to personal checking accounts after a debit transaction, Voice-over-IP (VoIP) calls recorded to facilitate insider trading. The book presents story after story after story of something that isn’t quit right about our electronic companions.

Although ostensibly written for a general business reader, When Gadgets Betray Us includes so many acronyms and technical details to make its point that the book may lose its intended audience. Individuals may have control over passwords and choices about where they connect to the Internet, but they have very little to say about the technology used by their cellular phone carrier and even less about the code burned into an erasable programmable read only memory, or EPROM chip. Perhaps the examples were considered to provide a kind of smorgasbord of fear so that each reader would discover at least one example that would drive them into a mental panic room.

When Gadgets Betray US asks that we consider our technological relationships, but in a world of increasing innovation velocity, can the average consumer of technology really be expected to keep up? Can we use our fragments of knowledge to shore up our security against the ruins of technological progress?

As I read through the technologies covered in this book, and the approaches to solutions to protect ourselves, I'm reminded of my policy work with political candidates during the cold war, where they were expected to understand nuclear deterrence strategies, deployment models, storage and testing options, not to mention various incarnations of the weapons themselves from single warhead to M.I.R.V.’s (Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle).

When Gadgets Betray Us reads like a policy briefing book. The book presents a series of categorized vignettes designed to raise the consciousness of the reader and prod him or her into action. The actions one should take, however, remain rather elusive. Vamosi never really gets to how to fix errant GPS systems, he simply documents their shortcomings, and then describes the potential outcomes generated by those shortcomings.

Consumers of technology have always been under threat by ever more sophisticated inventions. During the industrial age people were maimed by machinery during their working hours, leading to the design of guards on machines to increase worker safety. Eventually, sophisticated robots completely replaced humans in many of the most hazardous of endeavors. Some would argue that movements toward efficiency and safety that lead to the replacement of humans incurs its own kind of societal risk. When Gadgets Betrays Us is silent on the implications of such solutions.

Any book with this many specifics risks becoming obsolete quickly, if not before its publication, as the number of threats compounds with every new social media system, the capture of data from a new sensor types or the mash-up of information constructed for the benefit of any individual user. Talking about copy machines and hotwiring cars does little to add this book’s relevance or credibility.

Perhaps Vamosi is right, and the only thing we can do is be vigilant, protect ourselves using whatever tools we have at our disposal, from encryption to private browsing windows to keeping security patches up-to-date. Of course, we can always go back to… well, not even smoke signals or cave painting would really avoid passing on personal information to anonymous passers-by—so the only alternative really is just to watch yourself, set the default setting to “secure” and leave all your data at work where your employer can worry about it (although that won't guarantee protection of your data) -- or just stop doing anything online.

If those simple messages really are the best answers to the problems Vamosi thinks he is solving, then he could have saved 221 pages of examples, references and index entries and just created a PDF infographic or a postcard. For the paranoid, Vamosi provides sufficient evidence to induce technological catatonia. For the rest of us, we’ll treat our technology like the rest of our lives: we’ll hobble along, hoping for the best, and if something bad happens, we'll deal with it, and move on.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.