What the Influence?: On "Batman #19", Cartoons and Music

Composite of Batman: The Animated Series logo and Greg Capullo Batman from Batman #15. Insert Art: Batman #19 gatefold and still from Batman: The Animated Series opening theme.

While some comic writers and artists find inspiration in the past or the future or other artists or other genres, there are others that choose to jump platforms and find a muse in, say, television. Case in point: Batman #19

I’ve been using music as a crutch. Trying to find inspiration in unlikely verses or choruses or fleeting notes from a dramatic bridge. Recently the songs of Franz Nicolay, Into It. Over It, Papa, The Avett Brothers, Centro-Matic and Nothington have been on steady rotation, shuffled actually. I’ve argued that comics should come with a soundtrack, and while books like The Li’l Depressed Boy and Demo have stated the music that has inspired them, and Marvel recently announced a new digital music venture for ambient soundtracks to books, nothing like what I’ve hoped for seems to be coming to fruition.

To fill the void, over the last six months I’ve been providing soundtracks for my reviews and features. It started at New York Comic Con, trying to find songs that highlighted dramatic points, tying together different popculture media. A Rob Gordon for the comics crowd, however inconsequential.

There’s a point here about finding inspiration in other media. While some comic writers and artists find inspiration in the past or the future or other artists or other genres, there are others that choose to jump platforms and find a muse in, say, television. Case in point: Batman #19. While it operates like what we can expect from much of DC’s April titles, there’s another influence, one that grounds the title in past Batman incarnations and the character’s rich history.

The point of April’s DC comics is for us to utter, “What The [….],” just by the covers giving away a surprising plot point in a gatefold reveal. They may have abandoned that marketing language, but the covers and their function remain, and the cover to Batman #19 might just have elicited that very expression from a few gapped mouth readers.

All of DC’s April issues beg one important question, what came first? The stories or the covers? But that question can be rendered mute if the story in question is rather good. That’s the case with Batman #19.

Writer Scott Snyder crafts a story that sits after his “Death of the Family” storyline meditation on the Joker and right before his New 52 Batman origin “Zero Year.” It’s an adventure of the non-epic nature that we haven’t seen from Snyder yet, and shows possibly a major influence on his current work and his work to come. Namely, the seminal TV show Batman: The Animated Series.

Much like the Batman Annual where Snyder and his creative partners used The Animated Series version of Mr. Freeze as a jumping off point for their new version of the villain, Batman #19 operates nearly as the script to a lost episode. While it lacks the reserved yet sophisticated art deco atmosphere of Batman: The Animated Series, the set-up and narrative style is in keeping with the tone of that hallmark of Batman’s various other media incarnations. Plus it gives the author the opportunity to reintroduce a villain that has only had a cameo up to this point in the New 52 universe, Clayface.

This Clayface is of course different from the version that was used in The Animated Series, but Snyder’s take on the character, while mixing some supernatural and horror influences, definitely derives from that version. The added feature of Clayface mutating is narrative progression that seems natural if we view this as a loose homage to the cartoon series, despite the varied difference between the two characters.

But really, the more interesting aspect is that Batman: The Animated Series continues to influence its comics brethren beyond the crossing over of characters like Harley Quinn.

That a series that ended its run in 1999 (if you include The New Batman Adventures) still has relevance and speaks to how seminal the cartoons were for forging a shared idea of Batman. Also considering that two other Batman cartoons, The Batman and Batman: The Brave and The Bold, have aired since.

Many have written about the merits and legacy of Batman: The Animated Series, I won’t try anything to that extent here, but only throw limited focus on how various media forms have come to influence and affect the storytelling presently in Batman comics. More to the point, unlike how I’ve been using music as a crutch to inspire my work, the various Batman authors like Snyder have used The Animated Series to launch into new worlds and attempt deeper understanding of just how much a hero like Batman can transcend changing times and cultural understandings.

Batman: The Animated Series seemed to come out of nowhere, yet many will claim that it came directly from the Tim Burton Batman films. While cartoon and films share similar darker tones, The Animated Series took the very distinct iconography of earlier Batman work, most notably the very early Bob Kane and Bill Finger work and then the later Denny O’Neil edited work. It nearly completely ignored the sci-fi influenced years and the campy Adam West-era (except for that one episode that paid tribute to various Batman incarnations). Batman: The Brave and The Bold would resurrect that campy and lighter tone, and while that property certainly has its place, a calling back to a more innocent time, its place in Batman media history has yet to yield a strong influence on the present magazines.

The Brave and The Bold cartoon did however make an interesting point in a meta-inspired episode addressing some of its own criticism.

“Batman’s rich history allows it to be interpreted in a multitude of ways,” Bat-Mite (Paul Rubens) says in episode 19 of the show’s first season. “To be sure, this is a lighter incarnation, but certainly no less valid and true to the character’s roots as the tortured avenger crying out for mommy and daddy.”

One interesting point about The Animated Series and The Brave and The Bold is that for settings, both took Batman out of the current, or rather placed him in a city that functions as an anachronism – elements from the past, present and foreseen future were mixed into a stunningly realized art deco (or is it dark deco) vision.

Getting back to the point of influence, it’s a testimony to the overall impact of The Animated Series, which was influenced by the likes of Kane, Finger, O’Neil, Jerry Robinson and Steve Englehart, that it continues to influence the comics. While certainly Snyder and the various Batman Family writers owe much to the creators before them, that they can similarly pay tribute by acknowledging the Bruce Timm produced cartoon series nearly brings us full circle. If by circle we recognize the linear cannibalism inherit in our culture – what was old is new again.

I’ve noted for over a year now that Batman currently has a much more horror influence, and while I may direct our attention to the cartoons of the 1990s, let’s not forget how much darker the cartoons were compared to earlier Batman TV efforts, and how much darker Batman in general has become over the last decade. What made The Animated Series darker was a combination of the aesthetic and that it took the material and its audience seriously. I’m not convinced that that’s the case currently with Batman comics. Rather, the current comics seem to derive their tone from the horror infecting much of popculture and much of the world.

And while I’ll more than likely continue to use music as a source for inspiration, I would hope that the Batman writers would continue to utilize Batman: The Animated Series as baseline for their adventures, just like Batman #19 does. It would be a shame not too.

And just because I mentioned them earlier, here’s my playlist for this article.

Franz Nicolay – "Note on a Subway Wall"

Into It. Over It – "Pinky Swear"

Papa – "Collector"

The Avett Brothers – "I Never Knew You"

Centro-Matic – "Numbers One and Three"

Nothington – "Captive Audience"

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.