Swearin': Surfing Strange

Swearin's best songcraft battles their derivative impulses on this sophomore record.


Surfing Strange

Label: Salinas / Wichita
US Release Date: 2013-11-12
UK Release Date: 2013-11-04

On their self-titled debut, Swearin’ burst right out of the gates and refused to slow down, if more metaphorically than literally. Swearin’ was high-energy blitz laced with insightful, tune-oriented songwriting, and when it came out I spent hours with it in my headphones, the landscapes of Czech Republic, Austria, and Italy flying by. It was a very nativist thing to do; here I was in a foreign place, and yet I was so devoted to that one genre I’ve only heard done right in America: pop-punk. Somewhere, a boombox plays Take Off Your Pants and Jacket, and a bald eagle swoops in to grab the royal baby.

In any case, the straightforward power of Swearin’s energy left its influences less as name-checks than things you glance at in your rear-view mirror, already passed by at night. With Surfing Strange, the band slows down and stretches out, piling on further layers of grimy distortion and even the occasional guitar solo. Unfortunately, Swearin’s touchstones seem to be catching up with them, and the result is a strong album that nevertheless feels overtly, distractingly derivative in spots.

But first, the good parts: singer-guitarist Allison Crutchfield turns in across-the-board excellent songs, particularly opener “Dust in the Gold Sack” and “Loretta’s Flowers”, a slowly-strummed ballad. Crutchfield’s grasp of melody remains impeccable, and when her tongue-twisting rhymes line up with the right combination of notes, the result will simply never leave your head. I know this for a fact. “Kenosha” can be hummed on command, 18 months out from its release.

The best songs from also-singer-guitarist Kyle Gilbride stick to your ears like gum but rattle around inside like steel wool, and it’s his compositions that most ably employ the increased heaviness on Surfing Strange. First single “Watered Down” is full of delightful crunch and there are moments where everything but the feedback cuts out, and it is probably the most fun to be had on the record. It’s propulsive, exciting, catchy, everything this style of music should be. Gilbride has also turned down the whine that used to power his vocals, less bratty now than sardonic. In the moments when this all lines up, from either Crutchfield or Gilbride, there’s no one that can touch them, not in the whole damn scene.

Unfortunately, there are frequent moments when Surfing Strange doesn’t live up to that standard. “Echo Locate” and “Glare of the Sun” seem to have gleaned their vocals directly from Sebadoh and My Bloody Valentine records, respectively, and the former ends on a very Dinosaur Jr.-style solo. Of course, you could allege this about pretty much every guitar band making music today, as I’ve just named three of the biggest indie-rock touchstones of the past 20 years, and it’s not like we’re approaching Yuck levels of mimicry here. “Echo Locate” wisely blows up after a soft opening, and the talk-sing vocals of “Mermaid” that could have been found on just about any mid-‘90s rock album simply disappear, never to return, after Crutchfield enters the picture.

The issue is not that these influences are new, because they’ve always been there. Instead, they’ve never been this overt, less reprocessed than repurposed. Whether through enthusiasm, energy, or skill, this problem was repressed, or at the very least sanded over, on the debut album. Not so on Surfing Strange. This is hardly a fatal flaw. Like the best pop-punk, Swearin’ is emotionally direct, projecting their fears, loves, anxieties directly onto the listener, practicing the audience-as-canvas motif favored by contemporaries like Good Luck or High Dive. Their influences simply mitigate that directness, distracting from the heart-to-heart connection the music thrives on. I have no doubt in the future that Swearin’ can break that wall down.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.