'The Wolf Among Us' Builds a World in Four Buttons

The extent to which a story is interactive isn’t defined by how many buttons we press, but how important each button press is.

The first conversation in Telltale’s The Walking Dead (well, the first conversation of Season 1, a soon-to-be-necessary distinction) kept its focus squarely on Lee. The conversation was meant to establish his back story and personality; it was meant to be mundane and casual in order to establish a baseline normalcy that was soon to be shattered. Working in its favor was the fact that it didn’t have to do any world building. The Walking Dead takes place in the real world, so there was no need to explain any supernatural rules (well, not at this point anyways, that doesn’t happen until the zombies show up). This first conversation didn’t need to be expansive so it was kept narrow, focused, and the game benefited from that focus.

The Wolf Among Us has a much greater challenge ahead of it. This is a story about fabled fairy tale characters living in secret in Manhattan. By its very nature, the game has to explain a lot more about its world than The Walking Dead ever did. The first conversation in this series still needs to introduce us to Bigby Wolf, but it also has to explain the complex rules and politics of this secret fantasy society.

The first other character that you meet in the game is a three-foot tall talking toad in human clothes, aptly named Toad. The game doesn’t try to hide its inherent weirdness, it throws that weirdness in our face right off the bat, but then it pulls back so as to not overwhelm us. Your conversation with Toad outlines the concept of a Glamour, a magic that gives the fable characters a human form. As Toad starts making excuses for his un-Glamourized appearance, he starts adding layers to the conversation: He complains that Glamours are expensive and that the rates keep going up and that the magic is getting less effective and that he’s got a family to hide and that he can’t afford them and that the system is stacked against him. He sets up the larger class struggles at the heart of The Wolf Among Us in a concise, defensive rant.

The rest of the conversation focuses on this issues surrounding of Glamours, but that’s the only type of magic that is brought up. There’s so much back story to the world of Fables (the comic series that the game is based on) that The Wolf Among Us could easily have become an encyclopedia rather than a story. But Telltale holds back that flood of information, drip feeding us only what we need to know in the moment. This conversation is an excellent bit of introductory world building because it is so narrow in scope. It’s not meant to explain how the fables came to New York, how Bigby became the Sheriff, or the details of how magic works. It simply explains what Glamours are and the punishment for not using them. At the same time, it works as an introduction to Bigby because it establishes his role as Sheriff, and then immediately challenges that role with an ethical dilemma.

In response to Toad’s many excuses, you can choose to be sympathetic, dismissive, or stern. As the first choice in the game, your response here sets a precedence for how Bigby reacts to the world around him, so even though you’re just talking to Toad, you’re not just talking about Toad. If you’re sympathetic towards his financial troubles, you’re also expressing sympathy for the entire lower class of Fabletown. If you’re dismissive of his financial troubles, you’re dismissing the problems of the lower class in general and making an ethical stand with “The System.” If you’re stern, expressing sympathy while also admonishing Toad, then you cast Bigby as a reluctant drone in The System. This first choice sets the starting point for Bigby’s character arc: Is he a good man, a bad man, or a defeated man?

In the first five minutes we press all of four buttons, but The Wolf Among Us is engrossing as a story and as a game because those buttons are so important. The extent to which a story is interactive isn’t defined by how many buttons we press, but how important each button press is. In this case, we’re choosing sides in a grand class struggle, and even if our actions for the rest of the episode undercut that initial choice, it still serves its purpose in the beginning by quickly engaging us in the conflicts of Fabletown. In fact, the more that we undercut that initial choice, the more interesting a character Bigby becomes. I was a hardass to Toad, but I was much more forgiving of everyone else and that probably has a lot to do with the mitigating presence of Snow White, which brings up a whole other aspect of his character.

Telltale has honed their writing to such a fine point that four buttons is all it takes to start navigating the political muck of a fantastical community. Four buttons is all it takes to define a character and a world.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.