This Memoir by Steely Dan's Keyboardist Is a Tell-Some, Not a Tell-All

The facts at least those they’ve chosen to reveal in Eminent Hipsters, are often wrapped in sarcasm, smartass-ery, and good ol’ fashioned throwing the dogs off the scent.

Eminent Hipsters

Publisher: Viking
Length: 159 pages
Author: Donald Fagen
Price: $26.95
Format: hardcover
Publication date: 2013-10

There are some things we know about the rock band Steely Dan. First, it hasn’t been a band in the conventional sense for most of its existence. Second, their songs, with jazz-inflected structures and worldwise, often cryptic stories, have never seized center stage in the pop landscape, even as they’ve sold bunches of records and are enshrined in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Third, the core duo, bassist Walter Becker and keyboardist Donald Fagen, is as famous for their reticence to talk about their music as for the music itself.

OK, so maybe “reticence” is not the proper word here. Getting the straight poop on the band’s travails from Becker and Fagen has been a losing game for years. They’re past masters at cloaking their sardonic work in a suitably sardonic mythos. The facts, at least those they’ve chosen to reveal, are often wrapped in sarcasm, smartass-ery, and good ol’ fashioned throwing the dogs off the scent. Becker told band biographer Brian Sweet that neither he nor Fagen would provide an interview for the project, and to “carry on as if Donald and I were dead.”

Nonetheless, Steely Dan fans (like me) have managed to cobble together enough of the story through magazine interviews, liner notes and such. One might think the arrival of Fagen’s memoir, Eminent Hipsters, might fill in some of the blanks, or at least offer a Steely Dan roadmap for the uninitiated. Perhaps not surprisingly, that’s not the case.

This is the total antithesis of the recent wave of rock bios, memoirs and tomes fat enough to serve as doorstoppers. Eminent Hipsters is a slim, brisk volume, divided into two sections: a more formal memoir of Fagen’s upbringing and influences, and a journal from his 2012 legends tour with Michael McDonald and Boz Scaggs. It tells us virtually nothing about the life and times of Steely Dan, but it confirms some things about Fagen longtime fans have long since surmised.

First, he’s a jazzbo at heart. That much is clear from the presence of jazz within his Steely Dan and solo work, but no one would ever have guessed he’d been hooked as a wee lad by the Boswell Sisters, a trio of musicians with Connie as lead singer who recorded in the late’20s and early ‘30s. Although they had some success in their day, by the time Fagen came along in the baby boom, his household might have been one of the few in which they were still household names.

Fagen is still taken by the intricacies of how they inverted the conventions of their era’s music. His knowing, easy-going appreciation of the Boswells, neither fanboy gushy nor scholarly dense, will tempt you to YouTube to see what struck him so deeply. (By comparison, his brief tributes to Ray Charles and Ike Turner, while sincere, don’t carry the same level of personal resonance.)

We also already know that Fagen was heavily influenced by the offbeat side of boomer-era pop culture. He confirms that by flipping through his sci-fi library, moving past Philip K. Dick to less celebrated writers A. E. van Vogt and Alfred “Alphie” Bester. He then touches on the impact of humorist Jean Shepard’s work on his youthful psyche. All these influences logically point the way to The Nightfly, his 1980 solo album in which he invents a late-night radio deejay on the air at the height of the Cold War.

Fagen opens up a bit about his time at Bard College, where he started gigging out in a few local combos and eventually met Becker. The two discovered numerous common influences, and swiftly joined musical forces. Among their adventures was the 1969 campus drug bust, which rounded up the two of them and several other students, mastermined by a guy in the county district attorney’s office named G. Gordon Liddy (the saga is obliquely recalled in the 1973 hit “My Old School”). But by that time, Becker and Fagen had already pledged to take their talents in another direction, and save what they called “the dynamite” for bigger stages.

“But,” Fagen writes, “that’s another story.”

The back half of Eminent Hispters catches up with Fagen 43 years later, dealing with the vagaries of touring (something he never much liked to do in the first place) by keeping a journal. While he drops a few amusing anecdotes about the various goings-on and mishaps, it’s more of an opportunity to see how his mind works. He teeters on grumpy-old-man territory from time to time, but he also reveals his everlasting penchant for observing life from just off the side of things.

What the journal also says, which is something his music often does not, is that his music, and his approach to a life in the music industry, comes from a deeply personal place. He’s not just the hippest wise-acre in the room, telling stories and throwing down riffs. There’s thought and heart behind and beneath what he does and how he does it; the thought part we already gathered, the heart part is something of a discovery.

The most touching example of that is the second half of the 21 July entry, which has nothing at all to do with the tour. It’s a brief recollection of the anniversary of the suicide of his wife’s son, and how he broke off from the tour to be with her that day. In it, he admits his life, as well as his wife’s, will never be the same after that tragedy.

Attempts to deploy dimestore psychology to connect the personal lives of Becker and Fagen to their music, or expectations of either to suddenly get dishily confessional at this late date, continue to be ill-advised. But for an artist whose reluctance towards self-revelation has been part of his mystique, these short paragraphs, along with the descriptions of his family in both sections of the book, make Fagen much more relatable as a person (as does the December 2013 Down Beat interview in which he discusses his relationship with jazz past and present).

Our current social media-besotted moment has rendered the concept of oversharing to the realm of the quaint and peculiar. And our expectation that our stars pour not only their souls into their art, but also their guts onto our screens, has turned many entertainment consumers into self-entitled carnivores of private lives compelled to be made public. Eminent Hispters stands blissfully apart from all that. Then again, as his music has always made clear and this funny, charming read makes clearer, “blissfully apart from all that” is where Fagen has been for years.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.