'Saturday Night Live', Chronicled Intelligently

Saturday Night Live and American TV is among the most thorough and engrossing chronicles of SNL’s four decades (so far) on air, giving detailed attention to each era in the program’s history.

Saturday Night Live & American TV

Publisher: Indiana University Press
Length: 294 Pages
Author: Nick Marx, Matt Sienkiewicz, Ron Becker
Price: $25.00
Format: Paperback
Publication date: 2013-10

Reading Saturday Night Live & American TV is something of a surreal experience of déjà vu. When one starts with the introduction, entitled “Situating Saturday Night Livein American Television Culture” (as written by the book’s three editors, Nick Marx, Matt Sienkiewicz and Ron Becker), the impact is something akin to watching a movie preview on a DVD and, in fact, many of the DVD extras before actually watching the film itself. The introduction literally presents condensed versions of each subsequent chapter in the book, explaining what each contributing author will discuss in their article and serving as something of a “Cliff’s Notes” edition of the book at large. Reading the actual chapters continually gave me the weird feeling of “Where have I heard this before?” until I realized I had read this in the very book I was holding.

In truth, however, a great deal of the facts and events covered in this book are common knowledge and easy enough to obtain on the internet or in any of the many documentaries and other books that chronicle the impact of SNL on television in general. This isn’t to say that Saturday Night Live & American TV is a waste of the reader’s time. The book was released by the Indiana University Press’ Office of Scholarly Publishing, and the contributors are all professors and PHD students, not entertainment writers as we commonly see in such a case.

Accordingly, the book avoids such standard pitfalls as simply telling the history of the show and recreating the SNL Wikipedia page in book form. Instead, this volume begins by examining the television landscape that gave birth to Saturday Night Live, including, but not limited to, the “variety show” precursors on both television and radio, and the state of late night television (particularly Saturday night). As for the sketch comedy precursors, not only is Monty Python name-checked, but England’s radio precursor to that program, The Goon Show. Further, SNL’s strong connection to New York City, and many of the more edgy and turbulent parts of the show’s early years (including the argument that Saturday Night Live’s true father might not be Lorne Michaels) are explored in great detail. And this is just the first part of the book, entitled “Live from New York on NBC”.

Instead of continuing with a straight history of the show, Part II, “Staying Alive on Saturday Night” details the politics that the show has played with even from the beginning (a great deal of attention is paid to the popular campaign and debate sketches the show has done so well). This, almost naturally, blooms into a discussion of September 11, 2001 and the way the New York centered show led the nation in learning how to be funny again, after such a devastating terror strike. The Live music of the show and the occasional controversy that has spawned (yes, the Sinead O’Connor incident is discussed and pictured) is also touched on in this chapter.

A continued controversy with SNL’s audience has been the way the show has handled African American actors as well as audiences over its years in production (this criticism was recently spoofed in a 2013 episode hosted by Kerry Washington). Saturday Night Live and American TV handles this in the same academic style as the rest of the book, addressing the issues and the complaints without offering criticism, answers or excuses. This same academic approach carries all the way to the final essays which reveal the show’s influence beyond the TV screen, including its digital shorts by Andy Samberg and his Lonely Island group to the internet, often in real time when the show has aired.

However, this is, after all, a comedy show that the book is attempting to discuss in great detail and the colorful variety of the show is often done a disservice by the intelligent, informative and often dry writing style of the academics who created the book. Yes, this collection goes far beyond the encyclopedia entry that it could have been, but while the zeitgeist is captured in each of the detailed eras of the show, the color and humor rarely is. Appropriately, each of the many photographs printed in this book are in black and white and on the page, not on glossy inserts.

Truly, Saturday Night Live and American TV is among the most thorough and engrossing chronicles of SNL’s four decades (so far) on air, and the book gives detailed time to each of the many eras in the program’s history (while Lorne Michaels is clearly given his due as the show’s creator and main shepherd, the Dick Ebersol years are also addressed). Readers looking for an informative collection of essays from challenging vantage points will find a lot to love here. Those looking for a great read with the kind of humor that the show has given us over the years won’t find what they are looking for here.

However, “academic” is clearly the point here, considering that the publisher is, in fact, a university. This is a well-done book written by academics for an intelligent audience, as opposed to “the masses”. In that respect, vive la différence. On the other hand, giving away virtually the entire book in the introduction is a hard sell, in fiction and nonfiction alike.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.