'Bad Words' Is Bad, All Right

Jason Bateman’s directorial debut about a misanthropic adult who disrupts a school spelling championship benefits from his clockwork comic timing, but it mistakes a potty mouth for subversive humor.

Bad Words

Director: Jason Bateman
Cast: Jason Bateman, Kathryn Kahn, Rohan Chand, Allison Janney, Philip Baker Hall, Ben Falcone
Rated: R
Studio: Focus Features
Year: 2013
US date: 2014-03-14 (Limited release)

When will American moviemakers realize that putting aggressively racist and homophobic white people front and center as “shocking” comic relief is just the same old cultural baggage, recycled?

The question probably doesn’t need to be put to the makers of Bad Words, an intermittently entertaining and very occasionally unpredictable comedy whose greatest sin is actually not being racist or homophobic but having no third act. America’s most gifted and reliably dry comic lead Jason Bateman stars as Guy Trilby, a monomaniacal axe-grinder with one goal in life, to win the annual Golden Quill spelling bee. The problem is that he’s a middle-aged man exploiting a bylaws loophole to compete against kids who barely know what puberty means, much less what it’s like.

Unsurprisingly, Trilby is custom-made for Bateman’s perfected admixture of laconic sharpness. Instead of the more explosive brand of destabilizers favored by US comedy, your John Belushis and Will Ferrells, Bateman upends the norms of this closed micro-society of over-schooled spelling quants by having Trilby simply plant himself there and refusing to move or explain his motivations. Occasionally he’ll try to get a leg up in competition by upsetting his preteen opponents with some verbal guerrilla warfare. But in the main, Trilby is a stoic pillar of nasty. (Having played the put-upon and exasperated nice guy in everything from Arrested Development to Identity Thief, Bateman gets some mileage here out of going so far to the dark side.) He’s Bartleby, and will not be moved.

None of the other adults in the film comprehends Trilby’s motivations, and they're all infuriated by that fact. That includes the two women in the film who, instead of being understandably annoyed by Trilby’s antics, must embody different pinpoints on the shrewishness index. Allison Janney makes a thankless appearance as the Golden Quill director, just another authoritarian to be taken down by Trilby’s hyper-verbal and autodidactic insult machine. Kathryn Hahn plays the frazzled-haired, pre-cat-lady reporter who’s accompanying Trilby on his mysterious quest in order to get a story out of it. The two of them have occasional bouts of curious hate-sex that only demean her. Bad Words isn’t exactly Falling Down, but it’s hard not to be disturbed by how furiously eager the put-upon white male protagonist is to cut down the minority characters and women who get in his way.

The only person in Bad Words who appreciates Trilby is his nine-year-old sidekick, Chaitanya Chopra (Rohan Chand, a genuine find). A short, bubbly, and tireless fellow competitor, Chopra attaches himself to Trilby seemingly out of sheer loneliness. The kid is fazed by nothing that Trilby throws his way. Trilby tells the boy to “Shut yer curryhole,” and nicknames him “Slumdog,” but such aspersions have no effect. And since Chaitanya doesn’t fight back, apparently yearning for a bad influence to break open his overly controlled nerd life, Trilby consents to his companionship. Pretty soon, the two are having a grand old time of it, raiding the minibar, playing pranks on strangers, and walking in slo-mo to the Beastie Boys.

Between its occasionally inventive insult comedy and the sweet-sour pairing of Chopra and Trilby Bad Words could have settled into the same cycle of raw-then-heartwarming coda that the Judd Apatow comedy age has taught us to expect. In other words, we just know that beneath the raised hackles and adolescent lashing out of its (invariably) stunted-growth male hero lurks the soul of a wounded child, needing just one compassionate lover or friend to give him that last boost into maturity. So just forget all the tearful children and “curryhole” remarks, because really it’s Trilby who is supposedly the victim. By the time Andrew Dodge’s screenplay gets around to revealing the secret behind Trilby’s quest, it hardly feels worth the effort.

Bateman does keep his first film blessedly short. He’s the rare comic performer who clearly values economy more than overkill, keeping him from the pandering bloat that has afflicted other recent would-be shock comedies like We’re the Millers. Like Trilby himself, Bateman’s style is brusque and unapologetic. If only the story itself had the same honesty.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.