Beautiful Disasters: The Surprising Fun of 'Bridge Constructor'

Erik Kersting

Bridge Constructor's trial and error format yields miniature dramatic struggles against gravity that -- in their brevity -- are stressful, engaging, and beautiful.

In theory, the novel idea of Bridge Constructor, a physical puzzle game in which the player constructs bridges, should not be much fun. I don't find many people who obsess over bridges and the optimal way to build them. In fact, I don't even really discuss the merits of bridge engineering on a yearly basis. It is just not part of our cultural zeitgeist. Bridge Constructor's premise is also so dull. “Build some bridges on this budget” is basically the entire plot and rules the of the game. Yet, it manages to be an exciting, engaging, and surprisingly fun game that intrigues practically anyone.

The first thing about Bridge Constructor that makes it surprisingly fun is the amount of creativity the game makers have allowed in the designing of bridges the player can make. The levels in the game are only varied in the distance that the bridge has to cover, the player's budget in creating the bridge, and the materials available to create the bridge, which you may think would get repetitive, but this somehow creates enough variety to keep the player engaged for hours because no one strategy will work all the time. Also, the physics engine allows some of the most inane designs to succeed. Every level has many solutions, and while it can take awhile to figure one out, the player can be confident their solution was their own concoction, not something the game developers just spoon fed them.

While playing with my wife, our combined creativity often yielded very humorous results. Unlike trying to play a single player game like Civilization V or Pikmin 3 together, in which there is almost always one “correct” option and a bunch of wrong ones, in Bridge Constructor multiple people working together can create the most bizarre, but sound bridges. This makes the game a blast to play with a bunch of amateur engineers standing around the computer.

Because of Bridge Constructor's trial and error format, it is very easy to get people engaged in the game. The player forms a bridge and then sends some hapless vehicles to cross it. The player can see where the tension is building on the bridge and what causes the bridges failure, but everyone has different solutions as to how to solve the problem. The game is so simple it only takes a minute to understand the rules if you're watching someone else play and only two to start throwing in suggestions.

The game's trial and error format also yields these sort of miniature dramatic struggles against gravity that -- in their brevity -- are beautiful, stressful, and engaging. Every time the player tests the bridge, they're holding their breath, hoping for nothing to break. But when something does break it's hilarious because of the way the entire bridge collapses if just one piece fails. You never “kind of fail” in Bridge Constructor; you either succeed by the skin of your teeth or fail spectacularly.

This week I played the game in my office, and I was surprised by how many people would come up behind me and watch me play the game. Everyone I played with initially thought it was a dumb concept for a game, but they also ended up enjoying whatever period of time they played or watched way more than they thought they would.

I believe Bridge Constructor's fun comes from its physical nature. Nobody likes to watch their friend play Bejeweled and watching someone else play Tetris is usually just a frustrating experience. Bridge Constructor works as a team game because its operations coincide with similar rules in the real world. The player engages with gravity and engineers with the reality of physics (even if it is just silly game physics) in mind. It's easy to understand without being explained and is never overwhelming in its execution. At the same time, while slow in pace, it is constantly pushing the player towards success through trial and error. It may never be a “great game” in terms of narrative, but Bridge Constructor is great at its tiny premise and shows that even the silliest idea can be made extremely fun.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

Electronic music is one of the broadest-reaching genres by design, and 2017 highlights that as well as any other year on record. These are the 20 best albums.

20. Vitalic - Voyager (Citizen)

Pascal Arbez-Nicolas (a.k.a. Vitalic) made waves in the French Touch electro-house scene with his 2005 debut, OK Cowboy, which had a hard-hitting maximalist sound, but several albums later, Voyager finds him launching into realms beyond at his own speed. The quirky, wallflower vocals and guitar snippets employed throughout Voyager drop a funk that brings to mind WhoMadeWho or Matthew Dear if they had disco-pop injected between their toes. "Levitation" is as pure a slice of dance floor motivation as theoretically possible, a sci-fi gunfight with a cracking house beat sure to please his oldest fans, yet the album-as-form is equally effective in its more contemplative moments, like when Miss Kitten's vocals bring an ethereal dispassion to "Hans Is Driving" to balance out its somber vocoder or the heartfelt cover of "Don't Leave Me Now" by Supertramp. Voyager may infect you with a futuristic form of Saturday Night Fever, but afterwards, it gives you a hearty dose of aural acetaminophen to break it. - Alan Ranta

Keep reading... Show less

Hitchcock, 'Psycho', and '78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene'

Alfred Hitchock and Janet Leigh on the set of Psycho (courtesy of Dogwoof)

"... [Psycho] broke every taboo you could possibly think of, it reinvented the language of film and revolutionised what you could do with a story on a very precise level. It also fundamentally and profoundly changed the ritual of movie going," says 78/52 director, Alexandre O. Philippe.

The title of Alexandre O. Philippe's 78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene (2017) denotes the 78 set-ups and the 52 cuts across a full week of shooting for Psycho's (1960) famous shower scene. Known for The People vs. George Lucas (2010), The Life and Times of Paul the Psychic Octopus (2012) and Doc of the Dead (2014), Philippe's exploration of a singular moment is a conversational one, featuring interviews with Walter Murch, Peter Bogdanovich, Guillermo del Toro, Jamie Lee Curtis, Osgood Perkins, Danny Elfman, Eli Roth, Elijah Wood, Bret Easton Ellis, Karyn Kusama, Neil Marshall, Richard Stanley and Marli Renfro, body double for Janet Leigh.

Keep reading... Show less

Mary Poppins, Mrs. Gamp, Egyptian deities, a Japanese umbrella spirit, and a supporting cast of hundreds of brollies fill Marion Rankine's lively history.

"What can go up a chimney down but can't go down a chimney up?" Marion Rankine begins her wide-ranging survey of the umbrella and its significance with this riddle. It nicely establishes her theme: just as umbrellas undergo, in the everyday use of them, a transformation, so too looking at this familiar, even forgettable object from multiple perspectives transforms our view of it.

Keep reading... Show less

Those who regard the reclusive Argerich as one of the world's two or three greatest living pianists—classical or otherwise—would not have left the concert hall disillusioned.

In a staid city like Washington, D.C., too many concert programs still stick to the basics. An endless litany of Rachmaninoff and Tchaikovsky concerti clog the schedules and parades of overeager virtuosi seem unwilling to vary their repertoire for blasé D.C. concertgoers. But occasionally you encounter a concert that refreshes your perspective of the familiar. The works presented at The Kennedy Center on 25 October 2017 might be stalwarts of 20th century repertoire, but guest conductor Antonio Pappano, leading the Orchestra dell'Accademia Nazionale di Santa Cecilia, reminded us how galvanizing the canonical can still be. Though grandiose executions of Respighi's The Fountains of Rome and The Pines of Rome were the main event, the sold-out crowd gathered to see Martha Argerich perform one of her showpieces, Prokofiev's Third Piano Concerto. Those who regard the reclusive Argerich as one of the world's two or three greatest living pianists—classical or otherwise—would not have left the concert hall disillusioned.

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.