Vengeance Is the Motive for Almost Everyone in Season 2 of 'The Bridge'

While vengeance is surely a reliable dramatic device, its use here is also potentially more far-reaching.

The Bridge

Airtime: Wednesdays, 10pm ET
Cast: Demián Bichir, Diane Kruger, Franka Potente, Ted Levine, Matthew Lillard, Lyle Lovett, Annabeth Gish, Stephanie Sigman
Subtitle: Season Two Premiere
Network: FX
Creator: Meredith Stiehm, Elwood Reid
Air date: 2014-07-09

"I don't want pink, it's for whores and little girls who want to be princesses." The brutally named Eleanor Nacht (Franka Potente) looks at her new minion, a kid named Kyle (Daniel Polo), and instructs, "Something else please."

The scene comes early in the new season of The Bridge, and while it's brief and dark, occurring during a late night visit to Kyle's home so he can provide Eleanor with some of his mother's clothes, it's as chilling as any of the show's notoriously graphic corpse compositions. The chill here arises from Eleanor's quiet malevolence, her assessment and instruction of the child, her status as cable TV's latest serial killer. Just so, her particularities make her simultaneously different and too typical: raised a Mennonite and shunned, fond of "churchy" outfits and prone to dispensing horrific violence in her role as a cartel enforcer, Eleanor essentially embodies vengeance, the central motivation for pretty much everyone in The Bridge.

This includes the two detectives at its center, Chihuahua's Marco (Demián Bichir) and El Paso's Sonya (Diane Kruger). Their teaming was initiated last year by the discovery of a woman's body on a bridge between the US and Mexico, and the case that seemed at first to be about the ongoing ugly politics of that border and turned out to have a more banal impetus, that is, vengeance. While vengeance is surely a reliable dramatic device, its use here is also potentially more far-reaching. In part this has to do with its attribution to Eleanor, who reveals her terrible backstory later this season, but her specific story also seems vaguely irrelevant: vengeance in the abstract does its own narrative and emotional work.

And yet, Eleanor's job here is plain enough, as she inspires Sonya and Marco's investigation, alarms or annoys other cartel members. As the loyalist and least constrained of Fausto Galvan's (Ramón Franco) cartel killers, she's sensational but also representative. As you wait for her to do something awful to young Kyle, you also wait for Sonya and Marco to find her; "Kyle's dead," Sonya laments after they make one not-so-enlightening investigative stop. Still mourning the loss of his own son at the end of last season, Marco holds out hope that maybe she's wrong.

Sonya's approach to the case is, as always, practical and direct, methodical and a little mystical (as she makes her way to a crime scene with grim resolve, one of the male cops behind her observes, "There she goes!"). She's determined to identify right and wrong, to see her way through darkness, a desire that matches, rather uncomfortably, with Eleanor's declared pursuit of what she calls, alternately, "grace" and "light." You come to see that Sonya and Eleanor are differently damaged women (Sonya haunted by her sister's murder, Eleanor haunted by her own life), but Sonya is obviously your point of identification and Eleanor is the new season's resident monster.

As you might expect, this hackneyed arrangement of women characters is bolstered by the men who shake in their boots around Eleanor and the men who want to look after (or maybe decode) Sonya. Her mentor Hank (Ted Levine, brilliant, again) continues to worry for her, to imagine he can protect her, perhaps by intimidating her new lover Jack Dobbs (Nathan Phillips) or perhaps by lying to her about long-ago history. Marco lies to her too, explains away his lapses with sad references to his family, pretends he's not also in bed with villains. (That she's not so gullible as he hopes is visible in her skeptical expressions, but she never presses him.) Marco insists that the problem is the world around him, that you can't tell the bad guys and good guys apart, all you can do is survive and do your best to maintain a tiny bit of order in your corner of turf.

While you know that Marco's world-weary perspective makes sense, you can still appreciate Sonya's, understand her desire for order. You want to believe Sonya might make it right. This even though you know she can't possibly make good on the deal she offers Eva (Stephanie Sigman), whom she hopes will seal the case against the Juarez cops who raped her last season. You know Sonya can't possibly protect Eva, any more than the men who promise to do so. Still, you can appreciate Sonya's earnest pursuit of something like justice. Eleanor or Eva (or even Annabeth Gish's inept drug smuggler Charlotte) pursues vengeance that is bloody and spectacular, but Sonya doubts the world around her by definition. She can't imagine that the order she seeks can lead to certainty, but she might imagine her unrelenting focus will make a dent, for a minute.

As before, The Bridge loses its own focus frequently, sliding off into multiple storylines that follow pairs of characters, some less interesting than others, some downright distracting. But for all the time that feels misspent on Charlotte and her idiot boyfriend Ray (Brian Van Holt) or the self-deluding addict reporter Frye (Matthew Lillard) and his long-suffering partner Adriana (Emily Rios), The Bridge offers brief moments that resonate and sometimes, even chill. Eleanor doesn't like pink, Eva swings an axe while wearing a pretty sundress, Sonya baffles her fellow cops, repeatedly, painfully aware of corruption and lies but utterly focused on her own truth.

And so Sonya and Marco remain ideal opposites, the sort of partners who populate most detective shows but something else too. They cross borders each day, including the one between Texas and Mexico. And as they come to understand and look out for one another, they illustrate the fiction of order. It's the fiction that produces formula, expectation, and satisfaction. It's also the fiction that produces vengeance.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.