What Happened to the Amazing Spider-Man Franchise?

The Amazing Spider-Man franchise is supposedly in trouble. Why?

Apparently, the future of a certain Marvel mainstay is currently "up in the air". No, not any character from the Avengers or some of the second tier offshoots like the Guardians of the Galaxy. Not even proposed players like Ant-Man or Dr. Strange.

While the X-Men chug along mightily and Disney continues to distribute the wealth to its multi-franchised property, Sony has stumbled -- big time, according to reports -- on where Peter Parker and The Amazing Spider-Man should go next. There are even rumors that the franchise may be dead, having dropped significantly since the studio decided to reboot the webslinger shortly after giving Sam Raimi and company the boot.

According to reports, Roberto Orci, who split with his writing partner Alex Kurtzman earlier this year, made some vague yet morbid statements about the material he is no longer involved with. According to his supposedly insider speculation, the future is not bright for the genial teen crimefighter. Now, if you read the actual quote, it's hard to feel that Orci is doing anything other than distancing himself from a process he's no longer part of while concentrating on keeping the fledgling Star Trek dynasty (he's writing and directing the trequel to J.J. Abram's lens flarred updates) from imploding in his inexperienced face. For all he knows, Peter Parker and his pals are gearing up for another stab at big box office relevance.

Of course, that hasn't kept the wags from tailing, so to speak. Every Internet site with a genre or comic book angle has taken apart Orci's non-comments and turned them into the death knell for this property. Some have even gone so far as to add their own spin (including an intriguing link to Harry Potter), news they've gleaned from hours scouring the web, and have come up with the following conclusion: Spidey is dead.

The Sinister Six and Venom spin-offs? Viable, but still not 100 percent. Citing dwindling revenues from around the globe and the overall dissatisfaction with Marc Webb's overstuffed sequel, the pundits are predicting that Sony will shelve Spider-man, at least for now, until they can decide the best way to retool their reimaging. And this is with Parts Three and Four already greenlit.

For a while, it looked like everything was aces with the newly revamped character. Webb, whose previous work was more centered around character than action sequences, brought a weird RomCom level of lightness to the otherwise mythos of heavy pen and ink pastiche. Sure, the choice of villain for The Amazing Spider-Man was kind of lame (The Lizard? Seriously?) but Webb hit all the other beats right on their confused adolescent superhero head.

By the time the first film was over at least most in the fanbase felt the update was on the right track. It was no Raimi, but then again, the Evil Dead genius was what Sony was scrambling from, not something it hoped to recreate.

Granted, there were murmurs, disgruntled disagreements across the board (some liked new Parker Andrew Garifield, others didn't) while a few found the return to a more high school level Spidey both sensational and/or stupid. The cast and crew did everything right. They appeared at Comic-Con, found favor on social media, and even tweaked their own appreciations during press appearances. Amazing 2 was set up to be a sensation.

Instead, it turned into a nightmare of nuances. Opening weekend returns were (over)analyzed, global box office beleaguering the point. Critics crucified the film, mostly for taking a more (and More and MORE) is better approach to the narrative. They nitpicked the number of villains, the set-ups for future installments, and the lack of emotion.

Now it seems like Sony is in a quandary, as well. There's no telling if Orci is simply screwing around with fanboy obsessives or if his words are being reconfigured to reflect the feelings of those reporting them. In either case, the studio has a significant problem. The buzz is already writing Spider-Man off without a single sentiment of support from those who wanted the franchise reworked in the first place. Orci's opinion about Sinister Six and Venom makes sense, since both of these are new ideas, not ones recycled by five previous films. They also replicate the 800-pound gorilla in the screening room -- Marvel -- without having to mimic the company's carefully laid film foundations.

And thus we've hit on the problem plaguing Spider-Man (and the adversaries over at DC, for that matter). Marvel went to bat for its properties, prying most of them away from confused studio suits and charting their own unique course. Over time, over tenuous casting and directing choices, over several first rate introductory origin stories, Marvel crafted something 'must see'. It's the reason Joss Whedon and The Avengers sit as the number three film of all time with well over a billion dollars banked (a billion and a half, to be exact).

The same can be said for X-Men. Its characters were slowly and meticulously built up to the point where films such as this year's Days of Future Past play like a warm revisit with old friends.

Not Sony. Not Warner. These companies want to skip the hard part, establishing the material, before jumping in with both feet, all toes, and a pair of your mother's army boots to add as many characters to the concept as possible. Over the last few months, we've been hearing almost daily reports about the icons being forced into the already elephantine Superman v. Batman: Dawn of Justice Whatever while early suggestions for Spidey Three and Four (which, as we said, were set-up a while ago) saw the same level of character inclusion.

Such a "too many cooks" conceit would kill your average title, but superhero films are flexible. You have to set up the situation correctly, however before you start counting your scratch. Marvel did this. DC and Sony have not.

Of course, what most fans want is for Peter Parker's days outside the confines of Marvel proper to end, bringing him back into the Kevin Feige controlled fold and into future Avengers endeavors. Of course, that will never happen, but it's a nice idea. And, once again, Orci could be talking out of his ass. There's been no confirmations or denials from the studio, and it's safe to say that, if Pacific Rim can get a sequel, The Amazing Spider-Man 2 follow-up should be a gimme.

Spider Man is still a very popular character. Clearly, the problems with a certain webslinger start from the very tippy top. Without an understanding of what makes movie franchises endure, we could indeed be seeing a very limited return for a reconfigured superhero.

To be a migrant worker in America is to relearn the basic skills of living. Imagine doing that in your 60s and 70s, when you thought you'd be retired.

Nomadland: Surviving America in the Twenty-First Century

Publisher: W. W. Norton
Author: Jessica Bruder
Publication date: 2017-09

There's been much hand-wringing over the state of the American economy in recent years. After the 2008 financial crisis upended middle-class families, we now live with regular media reports of recovery and growth -- as well as rising inequality and decreased social mobility. We ponder what kind of future we're creating for our children, while generally failing to consider who has already fallen between the gaps.

Keep reading... Show less

Very few of their peers surpass Eurythmics in terms of artistic vision, musicianship, songwriting, and creative audacity. This is the history of the seminal new wave group

The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame nominating committee's yearly announcement of the latest batch of potential inductees always generates the same reaction: a combination of sputtering outrage by fans of those deserving artists who've been shunned, and jubilation by fans of those who made the cut. The annual debate over the list of nominees is as inevitable as the announcement itself.

Keep reading... Show less

Barry Lyndon suggests that all violence—wars, duels, boxing, and the like—is nothing more than subterfuge for masculine insecurities and romantic adolescent notions, which in many ways come down to one and the same thing.

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) crystalizes a rather nocturnal view of heterosexual, white masculinity that pervades much of Stanley Kubrick's films: after slithering from the primordial slime, we jockey for position in ceaseless turf wars over land, money, and women. Those wielding the largest bone/weapon claim the spoils. Despite our self-delusions about transcending our simian stirrings through our advanced technology and knowledge, we remain mired in our ancestral origins of brute force and domination—brilliantly condensed by Kubrick in one of the most famous cuts in cinematic history: a twirling bone ascends into the air only to cut to a graphic match of a space station. Ancient and modern technology collapse into a common denominator of possession, violence, and war.

Keep reading... Show less

This book offers a poignant and jarring reminder not just of the resilience of the human spirit, but also of its ability to seek solace in the materiality of one's present.

Marcelino Truong launched his autobiographical account of growing up in Saigon during the Vietnam War with the acclaimed graphic novel Such a Lovely Little War: Saigon 1961-63, originally published in French in 2012 and in English translation in 2016. That book concluded with his family's permanent relocation to London, England, as the chaos and bloodshed back home intensified.

Now Truong continues the tale with Saigon Calling: London 1963-75 (originally published in French in 2015), which follows the experiences of his family after they seek refuge in Europe. It offers a poignant illustration of what life was like for a family of refugees from the war, and from the perspective of young children (granted, Truong's family were a privileged and upper class set of refugees, well-connected with South Vietnamese and European elites). While relatives and friends struggle to survive amid the bombs and street warfare of Vietnam, the displaced narrator and his siblings find their attention consumed by the latest fashion and music trends in London. The book offers a poignant and jarring reminder not just of the resilience of the human spirit, but also of its ability to seek solace in the materiality of one's present.

Keep reading... Show less

Canadian soul singer Elise LeGrow shines on her impressive interpretation of Fontella Bass' classic track "Rescue Me".

Canadian soul singer Elise LeGrow pays tribute to the classic Chicago label Chess Records on her new album Playing Chess, which was produced by Steve Greenberg, Mike Mangini, and the legendary Betty Wright. Unlike many covers records, LeGrow and her team of musicians aimed to make new artistic statements with these songs as they stripped down the arrangements to feature leaner and modern interpretations. The clean and unfussy sound allows LeGrow's superb voice to have more room to roam. Meanwhile, these classic tunes take on new life when shown through LeGrow's lens.

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.