$10 million computer game championship highlights the evolution of eSports

Brian Crecente
McClatchy-Tribune News Service (MCT)

What started out as a computer game publicity stunt four years ago has quickly become one of the largest professional gamer competitions in the world, this year selling out tickets to a 12,000-seat arena in less then one hour and rewarding nearly $11 million in prize money.

The grand finals for The International, an annual “Dota 2” championship hosted by game creator Valve Corporation, kicks off this week in Seattle and is set to deliver the largest prize pool in eSports history.

“For almost all of these things, like The International or a specific feature in the game, it’s hard to figure out who came up with it,” said Valve’s Erik Johnson. “I’m sure it was in a meeting.”

In “Dota 2,” like most strategy games in the popular multiplayer online battle area genre, two teams of five player-controlled characters battle to destroy the opposing team’s base with the help of a stream of computer-controlled underlings. Because of the complex nature of the computer game, Valve decided they needed a special way to show off the title to the public for its first outing at the 2011 Gamescom video game convention in Cologne, Germany.

“The problem with ‘Dota 2’ is that it doesn’t lend itself well to a canned experience or just letting someone play it,” Johnson said.

So the developer decided to host an invitation-only tournament at the show to let people see what it would look like for professionals to play their game. The company invited some of the best teams in the genre to The International and give them about a month to play the then-unreleased game.

That first tournament gave away $1.6 million, a record at the time. The second, held in a 2,500-seat hall in Seattle, gave out the same prize pool. Last year’s set another record, handing out $2.8 million, much of it funded with the sale of a virtual playbook fans use to follow the action. This year’s $10.7 million prize pool hasn’t just blown away records, it’s also blown away everyone’s expectations.

“We knew it was going to go up compared to last year,” Johnson said. “Because we had a lot more people playing the game, the user base had about doubled. We also were in China now and the user base that could buy things had more than doubled. So we expected a substantial increase. But even with all of those things we didn’t see any of this coming.”

And the prize pool continues to grow. Every copy of the Compendium — the virtual playbook — costs $10, $2.50 of which goes straight into the prize pool. Of the $10.7 million, Valve only put in $1.6 million, the rest came from fans of the game.

All of the matches for The International are streamed online, with commentary, for all to watch for free. This week kicks off the main, event which culminates on Monday, July 21, with the grand finals. Valve predicts that more than 20 million people will be watching The International, including the 12,000 who bought tickets to see it live.

While The International seems to be taking on a life of its own, Valve remains committed to the games. That includes continued work on “Dota 2,” seeing what lessons learned through The International can be applied to other Valve games and helping other eSports leagues host their own events for “Dota 2.”

“We’ve learned a lot about what it’s like to run a live sporting event,” Johnson said. And perhaps that could lead to a Valve hosted tournament for another one of their popular eSports games: first-person shooter “Counter-Strike Global Offensive.”

“The ‘Counter-Strike’ team pays pretty close attention to what’s going on,” he said. “We share a lot of ideas between the two products.”

Valve also shares a lot of their lessons and hosting tools with eSports leagues around the world.

The Germany-based Electronic Sports League, which has more than 4 million members and 950,000 teams, hosted their first stand-alone “Dota 2” tournament late last month.

The ESL One managed to fill 12,500 seats in a Frankfurt stadium for two days.

“Everyone bought tickets and came to watch ‘Dota 2,’” said James Lampkin, product manager for ESL One. “I don’t think there are a lot of games that can do that.”

“Dota 2” is the second biggest eSport in the world right now, behind “Riot’s League of Legends,” Lampkin said.

“That’s in terms of players playing, watching streams on Twitch, event size and prize pools,” he said.

And these eSports don’t seem to be stealing audience from one another, Lampkin said.

“We all used to talk about this in those terms,” he said. “But we’ve come to realize that these games should all co-exist. Should the NFL kill the NBA?

“I think both games are going to keep growing and keep getting bigger. Personally, I watch five or six eSports and would attend events for all of them.”

And those audiences are voracious consumers, just not through television. While early on, eSports leagues fought to get their tournaments on broadcast television, the leagues don’t seem to care much about TV anymore.

“The traditional thinking was that you needed to get on TV,” Lampkin said. “Then we realized it was the wrong way to think about it. If you look at how people are consuming their media today, it’s online or mobile. I watch most of my content on the Internet, TV is like 10 percent of my time.

“We suspect going forward that having online distribution and mobile as our core is the strongest approach.”

Another old debate surrounding eSports has also dissipated: Is eSports a sport?

Two days before the ESL One kicked off, the same stadium was filled with German soccer fans watching the U.S. versus Germany World Cup match, Lampkin said.

“There were 19,000 people there screaming and cheering,” he said. “Two days later we bring ‘Dota 2’ to the stadium and it was almost the exact same effect.

“Some people ask if eSports are real sports. We don’t think that question matters anymore. If you can bring 12,000 to watch the best players in the world compete at something, who cares what you call it?”


(Good Game is an internationally syndicated weekly news and opinion column about the big stories of the week in the gaming industry and its bigger impact on things to come. Brian Crecente is a founding news editor of Polygon.)

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.