You Barely Need One Percent of Your Brain to Appreciate 'Lucy'

If you surgically grafted a snippet of Flowers for Algernon and a low-end documentary about the human brain onto a Cliff Notes summary of La Femme Nikita, the result might approach the lazy schizophrenia of Luc Besson's latest fembot warrior fantasy.


Director: Luc Besson
Cast: Scarlett Johansson, Morgan Freeman, Amr Waked, Choi Min Sik
Length: 90 minutes
Studio: Universal Pictures
Year: 2014
MPAA Rating: R
US release date: 2014-07-25

Luc Besson has been impatient when it comes to shootouts ever since 1990’s La Femme Nikita. A typical scene that we've seen him repeat from that film to 1997’s The Fifth Element to his newest, Lucy, goes as follows: a lone armed hero or villain walks swiftly into a room filled with many other characters with guns. The lone gunperson lets off many, many rounds in the blink of an eye. Everybody else falls down dead.

That tendency for cleaving away narrative fat served Besson well back in the 1990s when every film firefight lasted ten minutes longer than necessary. His taste for efficient and insouciant high-octane storytelling translated over into the high-end grindhouse films from his EuropaCorp action-factory (the Taken and Transporter franchises in particular), whose jaunty black humor often made up for their many other deficiencies.

But Lucy, Besson's first writing/directing credit on a major action film in a decade and a half, shows him having apparently grown impatient with nearly every convention of storytelling. We have barely met his Lucy (Scarlett Johansson) before she’s thrown into a bloody meat-grinder of a crime syndicate plot that results in her becoming a superhuman, god-like creature. All we know about Lucy is that she’s an American student in Taipei who likes to go clubbing. This lack of background drains the drama out of her transformation into near-omnipotence, no matter how nifty it is to watch her drop a roomful of gunmen to the ground with a flick of her finger (more on than in a bit).

Talked by a friend of hers into walking a locked briefcase into a luxury hotel just before he gets perforated by bullets, Lucy is whisked by a phalanx of gunmen into a suite where she meets Mr. Jang (Oldboy’s Choi Min Sik, whose brutal humor works quite effectively). A panicked Lucy discovers that she will be one of several mules who is going to have a packet of blue crystals sewn into their abdomens for transportation to Europe. Before Lucy gets to Paris, the packet ruptures.

The blue crystals turn out to be a synthetic version of a substance called CPH4 that (the film says) pregnant mothers transmit to fetuses in order to help them grow. Getting a big jolt of it blasts Lucy’s body and brain into post-human mode. Pretty soon she’s defying gravity, using X-ray vision, instantly accessing all downloadable human knowledge, and bending reality to her will like a more verbally dexterous version of The Matrix’s Neo mixed with Lisbeth Salander.

Along the way, Besson cuts to lectures of a cognitive science professor (wise, wise Morgan Freeman) who references the old (and already widely disproven) saw about humans only using ten percent of their brains. Besson also cuts to counters showing Lucy’s cortical capacity increasing, 30 percent, 40, and so on. As Lucy heads to Paris to meet with the good professor, with a wounded and highly ticked Mr. Jang close behind, the mystery of what will happen once and if Lucy reaches 100 percent (by revving her abilities so high, the CPH4 is essentially burning her body out at warp speed) is supposed to be driving the film.

If Besson had bothered creating an actual person out of Lucy, this might have happened. But by transforming her so quickly into an intellectual Terminator – Johansson's flat affect and jerky facial movements model those of Community’s Abed, but without any of his underlying empathy – we lose any sense of what she has lost.

By the time all the elements converge in Paris for another lazily choreographed shootout (who knew it was so easy to get assault rifles and rocket launchers in France on a moment’s notice?), it all hardly seems to matter. Lucy’s attempt at a quasi-Kubrickian ascendency into another state of being is laughably signified with a lot of Hubble space photography, and confusing to boot. Exactly how accessing more of her brain allows Lucy to become superhuman is never explained, nor how such a god-like being is able to control everything but can’t figure out how to modulate her voice.

Rarely has a film about human intelligence been so resolutely lacking in that ingredient.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.