'Dallas' Season 3 Is Rich with Reincarnations and Recycled Plots

Amanda Gilroy

The real pleasures of the new Dallas involve engaging with repetition in all its forms and taking melodrama seriously.


Airtime: Mondays, 9pm ET
Cast: Josh Henderson, Jordana Brewster, Julie Gonzalo, Brenda Strong, Jesse Metcalfe, Patrick Duffy, Linda Gray
Subtitle: Season Three Premiere
Network: TNT
Creator: David Jacobs
Air date: 2018-08-18

Dallas returns with a reminder of the mid-season's cliffhanger, with Southfork in flames and Pamela (Julie Gonzalo) in the throes of a drug-induced seizure that started during her threesome with John Ross (Josh Henderson) and Emma (Emma Bell). These events propel the episode, as we wonder who set the fire or who sent the incriminating sex tape to Pamela. But, as always, Dallas is less interested in resolutions than in the deviations and repetitions that lead to the answers.

As before, the new season's retro credits set up the motif of repetition. A new version of the original theme song plays over updated shots of the city in sliding panels, giving those viewers who remember the '80s series a nostalgic fix. We’ve also seen the episode's early plot before: as he did in the original series, Bobby (Patrick Duffy) here rescues Sue Ellen (Linda Gray) from a fire at the ranch. However, the series does more than reward the loyalty of long-term viewers, for it weaves an aesthetic of repetition throughout its melodramatic narrative and visual appeal.

In this Dallas, individuals are again kidnapped, blackmailed, and murdered, but mostly, they fall in and out of love. When all the casualties and bystanders of arson and overdose arrive at the same hospital, it takes a while to sort out all the couples and connections, as the characters are involved in a never-ending game of partner rotation.

So: Pamela was married to Christopher (Jesse Metcalfe), when we still knew her as Rebecca in Season One, but is now taking revenge against new husband John Ross. Elena’s (Jordana Brewster) past includes liaisons with both the younger generation Ewing males. Now she's paired with new boyfriend Nicolas (Juan Pablo Di Pace), but rushes to console Christopher when needed. For his part, Christopher keeps gazing meaningfully at ranch-hand Heather (AnnaLynne McCord), who looks a lot like Elena, seemingly forgetful that he was in love with Elena for most of his life and not long ago married to Pamela/Rebecca.

That Pamela and Rebecca are one person highlights how characters morph into new identities as the plot demands. Indeed, the show makes its characters seem oddly interchangeable, with new characters inheriting the names and narratives of earlier ones. This is something JR himself acknowledged before he died, when he touted his ability to vanquish “Pamelas,” as though “Pamela” was a generic model off the production line rather than an individual.

Viewers have to reach through “all the years of pain and damage,” as Ann (Brenda Strong) puts it, “to find the real Emma,” or any other character, for that matter. In this world of reincarnations and recycled plots, the question is whether there is a “real” character to find.

It’s not only characters who seem familiar. The new Dallas looks a lot like the old Dallas, too. Long duration camera shots (especially close-ups) and symmetrical image compositions give it an old-fashioned visual style. The camera balances Christopher and Bobby looking concerned. Soon after, Christopher and Heather repeat the pose. Emma and Pamela wear identical green lingerie.

Viewers will recall that they bought these matching outfits when they were shopping for Pamela’s honeymoon clothes, but why does the camera dwell on this detail? The emphasis on doubling helps us move beyond melodrama’s conventional schematic coding of good and bad characters. Emma and Pamela are romantic rivals and both would qualify as villains. But they also elicit our sympathy. And the fetishization of their chorus-girl gear hints at romantic entanglements other than heterosexual rivalry.

Other characters, though, stay true to their lineage. John Ross is doing is doing a sterling job at being his father’s son; like JR, he is unfaithful and unscrupulous, and also conscious that he is “damaged.” But Judith Ryland (Judith Light) seems this series' new JR. She dominates her scenes and gets all the best lines. “The ability to feel pain is a gift,” she tells her granddaughter Emma, “Nurture that hurt until it’s powerful enough to take vengeance on those who wronged you.” Part of the seductive quality of the scene is that we feel we have already seen it (and indeed, last season featured a similar scene between these characters).

The mix and match plot lines, the reincarnation of characters from the past in the present, and the visual style, all conspire against any sense of realism. However, as Ien Ang noted long ago in her audience research on the original series, emotional realism does not depend on verisimilitude.

What we recognize is a structure of feeling. In its exaggerations of plot and presentation, Dallas takes our emotions and our memories on a roller coaster ride. While seeming removed from real life, it can deliver moving scenes, which are layered with memories of the serial’s recent and distant past. The best of these is when Sue Ellen confesses (erroneously) to having started the fire, but more significantly that she is an alcoholic and “always will be.” More than three decades of struggle are encapsulated in this admission. Like Anne, I wanted to hug her.

It’s easy to think of Dallas as the opposite of the immersive "complex TV" mode Jason Mittell describes, now dominating the TV drama landscape, and to dismiss its formulaic déjà vu modalities. The Dallas reboot still offers space for the type of ironic spectatorship Ang described regarding the original series.

There will be viewers who love to hate it. Patrick Duffy’s acting remains wooden and Jesse Metcalfe is doing a good imitation. There is perhaps too much significant gazing going on between all the actors. But the real pleasures of the new Dallas involve engaging with repetition in all its forms and taking melodrama seriously, for this is a series that pushes at the boundaries of its genre.


From genre-busting electronic music to new highs in the ever-evolving R&B scene, from hip-hop and Americana to rock and pop, 2017's music scenes bestowed an embarrassment of riches upon us.

60. White Hills - Stop Mute Defeat (Thrill Jockey)

White Hills epic '80s callback Stop Mute Defeat is a determined march against encroaching imperial darkness; their eyes boring into the shadows for danger but they're aware that blinding lights can kill and distort truth. From "Overlord's" dark stomp casting nets for totalitarian warnings to "Attack Mode", which roars in with the tribal certainty that we can survive the madness if we keep our wits, the record is a true and timely win for Dave W. and Ego Sensation. Martin Bisi and the poster band's mysterious but relevant cool make a great team and deliver one of their least psych yet most mind destroying records to date. Much like the first time you heard Joy Division or early Pigface, for example, you'll experience being startled at first before becoming addicted to the band's unique microcosm of dystopia that is simultaneously corrupting and seducing your ears. - Morgan Y. Evans

Keep reading... Show less

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

Net Neutrality and the Music Ecosystem: Defending the Last Mile

Still from Whiplash (2014) (Photo by Daniel McFadden - © Courtesy of Sundance Institute) (IMDB)

"...when the history books get written about this era, they'll show that the music community recognized the potential impacts and were strong leaders." An interview with Kevin Erickson of Future of Music Coalition.

Last week, the musician Phil Elverum, a.k.a. Mount Eerie, celebrated the fact that his album A Crow Looked at Me had been ranked #3 on the New York Times' Best of 2017 list. You might expect that high praise from the prestigious newspaper would result in a significant spike in album sales. In a tweet, Elverum divulged that since making the list, he'd sold…six. Six copies.

Keep reading... Show less

Under the lens of cultural and historical context, as well as understanding the reflective nature of popular culture, it's hard not to read this film as a cautionary tale about the limitations of isolationism.

I recently spoke to a class full of students about Plato's "Allegory of the Cave". Actually, I mentioned Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" by prefacing that I understood the likelihood that no one had read it. Fortunately, two students had, which brought mild temporary relief. In an effort to close the gap of understanding (perhaps more a canyon or uncanny valley) I made the popular quick comparison between Plato's often cited work and the Wachowski siblings' cinema spectacle, The Matrix. What I didn't anticipate in that moment was complete and utter dissociation observable in collective wide-eyed stares. Example by comparison lost. Not a single student in a class of undergraduates had partaken of The Matrix in all its Dystopic future shock and CGI kung fu technobabble philosophy. My muted response in that moment: Whoa!

Keep reading... Show less

'The Art of Confession' Ties Together Threads of Performance

Allen Ginsberg and Robert Lowell at St. Mark's Church in New York City, 23 February 1977

Scholar Christopher Grobe crafts a series of individually satisfying case studies, then shows the strong threads between confessional poetry, performance art, and reality television, with stops along the way.

Tracing a thread from Robert Lowell to reality TV seems like an ominous task, and it is one that Christopher Grobe tackles by laying out several intertwining threads. The history of an idea, like confession, is only linear when we want to create a sensible structure, the "one damn thing after the next" that is the standing critique of creating historical accounts. The organization Grobe employs helps sensemaking.

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.