Valery Gergiev and the Mariinsky Orchestra: Shostakovich: Symphonies Nos. 4, 5 & 6

Three of Shostakovich's symphonies sound as scary as they probably did during their premiere, thanks to a unique orchestra and a unique conductor.

Valery Gergiev & the Mariinsky Orchestra

Shostakovich: Symphonies Nos. 4, 5 & 6

Label: Mariinsky
US Release Date: 2014-07-08
UK Release Date: 2014-06-02
Label website
Artist website

First off, I'd like to commend whoever is in charge artwork that adorns the covers all the Valery Gergiev/Mariinsky Orchestra Shostakovich symphony releases. The album in question is the fourth in the series, spreading the fourth, fifth and sixth symphonies onto two discs. I don't even know why the cover art rings so perfectly, it just does. So just on a visual alone, I find the album to be pretty special. But I realize I'm not here to discuss visuals.

The Mariinsky Orchestra is an organization that has taken the bull by the horns, business-wise. They have their own label, their own concert hall, and are deathly serious about preserving some of our last century's greatest musical works. Even the liner notes go the extra mile. There are two in-depth essays inside, one detailing the symphonies themselves and the other a biography of the composer printed in four languages! It appears that the ensemble can trace their origins back to a arts and culture splurge set in motion by Catherine the Great back in 1783. The organization got to play host to many famous premieres, including The Nutcracker. Their reputation was one of a cutting edge collective. And though Shostakovich symphonies might not be considered cutting edge in 2014, they are no less potent. Under Russian conductor Valery Gergiev's direction, these three symphonies shine with the aura of a bold highlighter and help to keep alive the notion that organized music is capable of marvelous things. With a good pair of earbuds, anybody can tune into the rapturous music that slyly set a new standard for what symphonies could do.

And lucky for the listener, Dmitri Shostokovich became a bit eccentric when composing symphonies. His fourth symphony was completed right around the time the composer was entering his thirties. The Soviet Union was a frightening place in the mid- to late '30s and Shostakovich himself was a mild pariah in the eyes of Stalin's regime. He stuck to his guns and completed the symphony, even if it sounds like his senses were on pins and needles while working on it. By many standards this is a long symphony, and the fact that the composer is able to sustain such intense feelings of suspense for approximately an hour is a display of power. Right from the first movement (this symphony only has three movements), you get the feeling that you have wandered into something that you weren't supposed to witness. The opening notes of the upper register hang in flight while the rest of the orchestra swoops down for the kill, only to be rudely halted by percussion. A light trot picks up here, but the harmony therein tells us that something is terribly wrong.

Shostakovich's fifth behaves in a similar manner. The sweeping figure from the start is a warning (fans of the Britpop band the Smiths will recognize this opening figure since Morrissey sampled it for "The Teachers Are Afraid of the Pupils" -- because when you're Morrissey, you can do things like that). As the first movement pushes forward amid quiet tension, you find yourself in a minefield. Explosions are going off left and right. Once in a while the opening figure will reappear, reminding you that you were fairly warned of the dangers ahead. Both the fifth and sixth symphonies are on the second disc. They are comparably shorter than the fourth, but they are no less chilling. The sixth one's first movement really screws with your expectations with all of the pianissimo dynamics and unresolving harmony. The composer saves the heavy artillery for the "Allegro" and "Presto" movements where his use of unease is matched by his use of stealth.

After spending so much time listening to Shostakovich: Symphonies Nos. 4, 5 & 6, I'm still in awe of the Mariinsky Orchestra's knack to not only perform this music immaculately but also get out of its way and let the human conditions shine forth. We cannot allow ourselves to take recordings like this for granted. If we do, we are doomed to forget the gift of luster bestowed upon us by men like Dmitri Shostakovich and the gift of spit and polish by men like Valery Gergiev. The Mariinsky Orchestra know where they stand. They've known for 231 years.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

Electronic music is one of the broadest-reaching genres by design, and 2017 highlights that as well as any other year on record. These are the 20 best albums.

20. Vitalic - Voyager (Citizen)

Pascal Arbez-Nicolas (a.k.a. Vitalic) made waves in the French Touch electro-house scene with his 2005 debut, OK Cowboy, which had a hard-hitting maximalist sound, but several albums later, Voyager finds him launching into realms beyond at his own speed. The quirky, wallflower vocals and guitar snippets employed throughout Voyager drop a funk that brings to mind WhoMadeWho or Matthew Dear if they had disco-pop injected between their toes. "Levitation" is as pure a slice of dance floor motivation as theoretically possible, a sci-fi gunfight with a cracking house beat sure to please his oldest fans, yet the album-as-form is equally effective in its more contemplative moments, like when Miss Kitten's vocals bring an ethereal dispassion to "Hans Is Driving" to balance out its somber vocoder or the heartfelt cover of "Don't Leave Me Now" by Supertramp. Voyager may infect you with a futuristic form of Saturday Night Fever, but afterwards, it gives you a hearty dose of aural acetaminophen to break it. - Alan Ranta

Keep reading... Show less

Hitchcock, 'Psycho', and '78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene'

Alfred Hitchock and Janet Leigh on the set of Psycho (courtesy of Dogwoof)

"... [Psycho] broke every taboo you could possibly think of, it reinvented the language of film and revolutionised what you could do with a story on a very precise level. It also fundamentally and profoundly changed the ritual of movie going," says 78/52 director, Alexandre O. Philippe.

The title of Alexandre O. Philippe's 78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene (2017) denotes the 78 set-ups and the 52 cuts across a full week of shooting for Psycho's (1960) famous shower scene. Known for The People vs. George Lucas (2010), The Life and Times of Paul the Psychic Octopus (2012) and Doc of the Dead (2014), Philippe's exploration of a singular moment is a conversational one, featuring interviews with Walter Murch, Peter Bogdanovich, Guillermo del Toro, Jamie Lee Curtis, Osgood Perkins, Danny Elfman, Eli Roth, Elijah Wood, Bret Easton Ellis, Karyn Kusama, Neil Marshall, Richard Stanley and Marli Renfro, body double for Janet Leigh.

Keep reading... Show less

Mary Poppins, Mrs. Gamp, Egyptian deities, a Japanese umbrella spirit, and a supporting cast of hundreds of brollies fill Marion Rankine's lively history.

"What can go up a chimney down but can't go down a chimney up?" Marion Rankine begins her wide-ranging survey of the umbrella and its significance with this riddle. It nicely establishes her theme: just as umbrellas undergo, in the everyday use of them, a transformation, so too looking at this familiar, even forgettable object from multiple perspectives transforms our view of it.

Keep reading... Show less

Those who regard the reclusive Argerich as one of the world's two or three greatest living pianists—classical or otherwise—would not have left the concert hall disillusioned.

In a staid city like Washington, D.C., too many concert programs still stick to the basics. An endless litany of Rachmaninoff and Tchaikovsky concerti clog the schedules and parades of overeager virtuosi seem unwilling to vary their repertoire for blasé D.C. concertgoers. But occasionally you encounter a concert that refreshes your perspective of the familiar. The works presented at The Kennedy Center on 25 October 2017 might be stalwarts of 20th century repertoire, but guest conductor Antonio Pappano, leading the Orchestra dell'Accademia Nazionale di Santa Cecilia, reminded us how galvanizing the canonical can still be. Though grandiose executions of Respighi's The Fountains of Rome and The Pines of Rome were the main event, the sold-out crowd gathered to see Martha Argerich perform one of her showpieces, Prokofiev's Third Piano Concerto. Those who regard the reclusive Argerich as one of the world's two or three greatest living pianists—classical or otherwise—would not have left the concert hall disillusioned.

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.