Comics Are Not Just an American Artform…

Comics: A Global History, 1968 to the Present is an informative and well-written exploration of worldwide comics. Yet it attempts to cover too much, and it will leave you wanting more.

Comics: A Global History, 1968 to the Present

Publisher: Thames & Hudson
Length: 320 pages
Author: Dan Mazur & Alexander Danner
Price: $39.95
Format: Paperback
Publication date: 2014-06

Back in September of this year, I reviewed a book called American Comic Book Chronicles: 1965-69 by John Wells, an in-depth volume about a very specific (and important) part of American Comic Book History. The book certainly lived up to its title in that is explored specifically American comics during those particular years, without a focus on the global comics industry.

Dan Mazur and Alexander Danner’s Comics: A Global History, 1968 to the Present takes a very different approach, even where there is overlap. As the title indicates, this book explores a much longer amount of time on a much more global scale in only 32 more pages than the other book’s 288. Sound good? Well, it certainly can be, even and especially as it avoids the narrow focus of American Comic Book Chronicles. That said, with a wider focus, depth is also sacrificed to a degree.

Still, the authors go further than expected, and certainly farther back than the stated year of 1968. The preface begins with the ongoing debate over the origins of comics. The single phrase, “no single culture or country can claim ownership of the medium” is both accurate and something of a thesis statement for the entire book.

Comics are not a uniquely American form of entertainment, although American comics do control a large percentage of the industry. Smartly, Mazur and Danner do not ignore American comics and solely focus on the rest of the world. The attractive cover begins with frames from an Italian comic, merges into a Japanese Manga frame, gives way to a splash from a French strip, all atop a detail of the American icon The Shadow, punching out a couple of bad guys.

Similarly the first interior images are of Belgian, Japanese and underground American comics before giving way to a stunning, full color page of Jack Kirby drawing from The Mighty Thor. If that’s not enough, Thor himself is mocked in a French comic just a few pages later.

After the aforementioned preface, Comics is led by an intro that catches up readers in a very “comic book-esque” way. Although scholarly and almost professorial in tone, the introduction almost feels like a “previously on” or “last issue of” style recap, reaching back with subheadings like “Postwar European and British Comics”, “Postwar Manga”, “Postwar Comics in America”, “The 1960s and Adult Comics”, “Japanese Comics in the 1960s”, “European Comics, 1959-1968” and “American Comics to 1968”. This is an informative and very balanced read that leads directly into the first chapter which deals, most appropriately, with the underground comics that grew to popularity starting in 1968.

While the preface argues that children’s comics do not “have less inherently less artistic value than those aimed at adults”, the first chapter is decidedly adult, as were most of the “underground comics” of the day. Sex, Drugs, Rock 'n' Roll and other “adult intellectual” themes are all explored (as they were in the comics) to varying degrees of “intellectuality” (though with undeniable lengths of “adult” content). Violence and nudity are hardly spared, here. In short, it’s exactly the kind of book most kids would love to “accidentally” find in dad’s stash.

Comics isn’t merely a recap or reprint of past prurience, however. Mazur and Danner are studious in their research and analysis of the works of Robert Crumb, Dan Spiegelman, Richard Corben and so many other artists from that era. They are just as studious in their second chapter, concerning “American Mainstream Comics”. Brilliantly, the authors kick off with the work of the amazing artist Neal Adams before delving into the evolution of Jack Kirby and his influential style (that contributed to Pop Art). Gil Kane and Joe Kubert are also given their due here, but this second chapter deserved to be much longer. To be sure, the authors have many more years to cover (and the rest of the world), but as indicated previously, the wider lens look causes a lack of depth in focus.

Chapter 3 is another stunning (and equally uncensored) look at the '70s of the American mainstream, while the fourth chapter smartly delves into the mainstream of Japanese Manga. The images here range from the simplistic to the cartoonish to the absolutely terrifying in a successful attempt to show the diversity of the Japanese artform. This continues in the fifth chapter’s deep discussion of Alternative Manga, which echoes the Underground comics of the USA with a decidedly Rising Sun flare in the art, both modern and historical. A sixth chapter focuses specifically on the impactful artist Osamu Tezuka before the authors stretch across the seas to discuss European comics in the seventh chapter.

As explored in the next chapter, what makes the European comics so vital can almost be summed up in one word: Mobius. The artist (born as Jean Giraud) captured the most epic, dark and fantastic levels of comics up to this point, and helped create the visual style that came to be best known in the pages of Heavy Metal (Metal Hurlant).

This is where Danner and Mazur wisely break off into an unexpected direction. As comics hit a new cinematic and enthralling peak in the '70s, they began to grow worldwide in popularity and influenced artists everywhere. The next several chapters travel through Europe sampling their gridded pages almost like fine cuisine and detailing their influences on each other. This naturally gives way to a stop in the UK, where surprising successes like Warrior and 2000 AD (featuring one Judge Dredd) helped give rise to the British Invasion of American comics. These comics, in turn, became some of the most influential of all time, not only on the gridded page but in film and television, as well.

The duo continues their world tour in attempts to cover the maturing of Manga, the incredible new mature comics like Alan Moore’s Watchmenand Neil Gaiman’s Sandman through the new black and white alternative comics that sprung up in the USA. Comics continues to globe trot throughout the '90s to the present, often re-exploring genres previously touched upon (Manga’s evolution is revisited multiple times in many chapters). This is all against the backdrop of some very good research and reporting throughout all 19 chapters.

Comics can be a beautiful book filled with glorious reprints in color and black and white (always where appropriate, considering original printings). When closer looks are warranted, the authors know when to fill an entire page of the book with an entire page from the comics they are discussing, and when to provide detail for the reader to explore. As a cover-to-cover read, Comics is informative and interesting with a lot of solid (and well researched facts). As a reference book, Comics is graced by a thorough and accurate index allowing for quick references to creators, companies and titles.

Published in 2014, Comics attempts to explore 46 years of comics the world over (plus prefaces covering summaries of prior years). This is a lot of material to address in only 320 pages. To a great degree, Mazur and Danner are successful in this and they have given us a thorough, well-written and well-researched documentary tome. However, I must add the phrase “for what it is”. Many chapters presented a great deal of information that was completely new to me and educated me (unpretentiously) on how ignorant I was of many types of comics from other countries in other languages.

However, some of the chapters are simply too light and form merely a syllabus, not an education. Do I expect these writers to cover everything? No. However, there are notable omissions that are relatively vital to the history of comics. Before Mobius there must be Kirby, before Watchmen there must be 2000 AD. These are covered, but what was missed? For example, America’s Captain Marvel begat the UK’s Marvelman before Captain Marvel was revived in the '70s and Marvelman became Miracleman during comics’ British Invasion of the '80s. Where is this mention, when so many other fallen dominoes are covered? And considering the global reach of this book, what might have been left out in total? If this book is supposed to represent comics globally, what about comics outside of Europe, North America and Japan? For example, Argentina’s comics industry has thrived for years (with both reprints and original work) and there is scant mention of anything South American in this otherwise representative book.

To be sure, Mazur and Danner have created a fine book with some very good research and writing which leaves the reader wanting more. But in a documentary, needing more implies incompleteness. Perhaps future editions could be broken out into varied decades for a deeper exploration. As it stands, this book is a very informative companion piece to other comics-based reference volumes and is certainly worth reading for historians and fans alike.

It’s strange to ask for “more” when a title purports to cover 46 years on multiple continents. That said, I’m happy to put on my best Oliver Twist adaptation and say “Please, sirs. I want some more.”

Splash image from interior of Comics: A Global History, 1968 to the Present


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

Electronic music is one of the broadest-reaching genres by design, and 2017 highlights that as well as any other year on record. These are the 20 best albums.

20. Vitalic - Voyager (Citizen)

Pascal Arbez-Nicolas (a.k.a. Vitalic) made waves in the French Touch electro-house scene with his 2005 debut, OK Cowboy, which had a hard-hitting maximalist sound, but several albums later, Voyager finds him launching into realms beyond at his own speed. The quirky, wallflower vocals and guitar snippets employed throughout Voyager drop a funk that brings to mind WhoMadeWho or Matthew Dear if they had disco-pop injected between their toes. "Levitation" is as pure a slice of dance floor motivation as theoretically possible, a sci-fi gunfight with a cracking house beat sure to please his oldest fans, yet the album-as-form is equally effective in its more contemplative moments, like when Miss Kitten's vocals bring an ethereal dispassion to "Hans Is Driving" to balance out its somber vocoder or the heartfelt cover of "Don't Leave Me Now" by Supertramp. Voyager may infect you with a futuristic form of Saturday Night Fever, but afterwards, it gives you a hearty dose of aural acetaminophen to break it. - Alan Ranta

Keep reading... Show less

Hitchcock, 'Psycho', and '78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene'

Alfred Hitchock and Janet Leigh on the set of Psycho (courtesy of Dogwoof)

"... [Psycho] broke every taboo you could possibly think of, it reinvented the language of film and revolutionised what you could do with a story on a very precise level. It also fundamentally and profoundly changed the ritual of movie going," says 78/52 director, Alexandre O. Philippe.

The title of Alexandre O. Philippe's 78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene (2017) denotes the 78 set-ups and the 52 cuts across a full week of shooting for Psycho's (1960) famous shower scene. Known for The People vs. George Lucas (2010), The Life and Times of Paul the Psychic Octopus (2012) and Doc of the Dead (2014), Philippe's exploration of a singular moment is a conversational one, featuring interviews with Walter Murch, Peter Bogdanovich, Guillermo del Toro, Jamie Lee Curtis, Osgood Perkins, Danny Elfman, Eli Roth, Elijah Wood, Bret Easton Ellis, Karyn Kusama, Neil Marshall, Richard Stanley and Marli Renfro, body double for Janet Leigh.

Keep reading... Show less

Mary Poppins, Mrs. Gamp, Egyptian deities, a Japanese umbrella spirit, and a supporting cast of hundreds of brollies fill Marion Rankine's lively history.

"What can go up a chimney down but can't go down a chimney up?" Marion Rankine begins her wide-ranging survey of the umbrella and its significance with this riddle. It nicely establishes her theme: just as umbrellas undergo, in the everyday use of them, a transformation, so too looking at this familiar, even forgettable object from multiple perspectives transforms our view of it.

Keep reading... Show less

Those who regard the reclusive Argerich as one of the world's two or three greatest living pianists—classical or otherwise—would not have left the concert hall disillusioned.

In a staid city like Washington, D.C., too many concert programs still stick to the basics. An endless litany of Rachmaninoff and Tchaikovsky concerti clog the schedules and parades of overeager virtuosi seem unwilling to vary their repertoire for blasé D.C. concertgoers. But occasionally you encounter a concert that refreshes your perspective of the familiar. The works presented at The Kennedy Center on 25 October 2017 might be stalwarts of 20th century repertoire, but guest conductor Antonio Pappano, leading the Orchestra dell'Accademia Nazionale di Santa Cecilia, reminded us how galvanizing the canonical can still be. Though grandiose executions of Respighi's The Fountains of Rome and The Pines of Rome were the main event, the sold-out crowd gathered to see Martha Argerich perform one of her showpieces, Prokofiev's Third Piano Concerto. Those who regard the reclusive Argerich as one of the world's two or three greatest living pianists—classical or otherwise—would not have left the concert hall disillusioned.

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.