How Digital Comics Changed the Way I Think About Print

There is no cloud storage for print, making the decision to recycle a bunch of my print comics qualitatively different from my decision to delete a book or title from my tablet.

It took three years and a few months, but I recently crossed that point in our new house where I no longer had room for my monthly print comics, at least not in the planned storage space. This time, though, instead of trying to manufacture additional storage, I decided to sort through the books and make choices about what I wanted to keep and what I would recycle. I think that the past few years of also buying and reading comics digitally is what prompted me to let go of certain of books instead of continuing to collect single issues for all of my periodical purchases.

In Digital Comics and the Return of Disposability, I wrote about digital and the "disposability" of comics or, how digital publishing had made it possible to "safely" read and enjoy comics, especially pulpy, silly, generic comics, without treating them as "collectibles". The widespread adoption of digital formats by comics publishers, including back catalogs has, effectively, ended scarcity, at least for many regularly published titles. Most digital services also make it possible for readers to "dispose" of their books by deleting from their devices while still retaining the right to access those comics from company servers at a later date

Of course, there's no cloud storage for print, making the decision to recycle a bunch of my print comics qualitatively different from my decision to delete a book or title from my tablet. And yet I think that making those kinds of decisions with my digital comics was instrumental to my even considering "disposal" as a viable option.

For one, I know from using my accounts with comiXology and Dark Horse that I have access to hundreds of books that I never go back to after deletion from my local reading device. Digital has afforded me a chance to a do a kind of controlled experiment in the value and purpose of storing comics. If I had found myself repeatedly going back to my account to re-download books, I think I would have approached the problem of my overstock of print comics differently. However, because I have not done that, I could look at those books with a more critical eye and make the choice to recycle rather than seek new storage.

For another, digital and print exist in relationship to one another, and not in isolation. Digital publishing means that, particularly for current and recent titles, readers usually have the option to replace a print copy with access to a digital edition. If, for some reason, I decide I need to go back and read back issues of, say, All New X-Men, I will be able to do so. Yes, I will have paid twice for the same issue or issues, but additional storage comes with costs as well. I am more than happy to pay a discounted price for a few back issues if it means not having to buy or make new shelves or stack more boxes in the garage. However, the first point is the salient one: most monthly comics are perfectly suited to being read and enjoyed in the moment, and once that moment has passed, I can let go of the book.

The "My Backups" feature that is now part of comiXology has given me another way to test my preferences for what comics I want to own and keep versus those I feel less compelled to have at hand. When I wrote "Who Wants to Read Comics on a Computer?" last August, this functionality was still new and I had just done my first round of downloads to my laptop, which numbered 13 out of a possible 188 books or issues. Since then, I have downloaded an additional five copies of titles I've purchased through the service. According to comiXology, I have an additional 312 books that I could download right now. I probably will choose more titles to backup locally at some point, but I haven't actually thought about doing this for months

Digital does not fix storage problems when it comes to comics; it reframes those problems. A digital comic can be read without needing a place in the house after, but the number of books I can have downloaded to my tablet at any given time is limited by available memory. When I download a comic from comiXology, or some other source, I don't need a box or shelf, but I do need storage memory on my laptop and associated backup drives. That necessarily means using megabytes that I might also want for some other file.

Preserving local digital storage space means always making choices about when and where to leave purchases in the cloud, which is an option that, currently at least, comes as part of the digital price. Obviously, the print version of the cloud, which would be to rent or acquire some kind of offsite storage, does not have that advantage, but the convenience of offsite digital storage typically comes at the cost of not fully owning a book.

My preference for my digital downloads has been to use this feature for, largely, longer form, single-authored works from smaller and independent publishers. In the case of my print comics, I am only addressing monthly pamphlets but, the same basic pattern holds: when I reduced my books down to the "essential" issues, I as left with comics that were almost entirely from publishers like Image and Dark Horse. The Marvel titles I kept are ones that are, or have been, more "auteurist" and outside of the publisher's mainstream continuity (so, for examples, G. Willow Wilson's, Adrian Alphona's and Sana Amanat's Ms. Marvel and Matt Fraction's, David Aja's and Matt Hollingsworth's Hawkeye).

These preferences are, of course, mine and mine alone, however much they may also rehearse some fairly predictable habits for someone like myself (40-something adult reader and academic that I am). What I do think is important here is that these are preferences that reflect my priority as a reader of comics and not a collector. The collecting ethos is such a powerful force in American comics culture that I did keep a few number ones and issues with notable covers but, mostly, when deciding what to keep on the shelf and what to recycle, I focused on my reading experience. Those titles about which I care the most and have the most invested in terms of time and character attachment, and that seem more "precious" narratively, are the titles I kept. The titles that I enjoy enough to buy and read on a regular basis, but in which I have less of an emotional and narrative investment, are the titles I chose for the recycling bin.

How I value these issues is likely to change over time, which is the risk of doing what I did with my current "excess", and is a risk I don't have to assume with my digital books, but one of the reasons why I think I put most of the Marvel comics in the recycling and kept many of the titles from smaller publishers on the shelf is that Marvel's publishing strategies tend to cheapen individual issues and titles (do I really need to keep all of the issues of the X-titles I read which were caught up in some crossover I was barely tracking? No, I don't). Within that corporate structure, there is room for titles, issue runs, and creative efforts, that stand on their own, but such efforts tend to be more limited in scope and duration than the comparable creator-owned works from the smaller publishers, such as the Hellboy/BPRD books published by Dark Horse or a title like Bryan Vaughan's and Fiona Staples' Saga from Image.

Of course, in the end, all I am really saying is that I like what I like and what I like most is what I kept. Before digital comics were part of my routine buying and reading, I felt more compelled to keep everything I read. My experiences with managing books in the newer medium have led me to rethink print. While it's tempting to see print and digital as two sides of a binary, I think that, in practice, and for the foreseeable future, in comics, like most creative forms being remade with new media, the relationship between these formats is less either/or and more both/and. Digital may become more prominent, and even primary, but there will always be a demand for print.

What is in process of being sorted out between creators, publishers and readers is not simply a transition to digital, but also what role print will have during and after that transition. At whatever scale you consider this question, there are no absolute answers to how best to make, read, or store and dispose of comics.

To be a migrant worker in America is to relearn the basic skills of living. Imagine doing that in your 60s and 70s, when you thought you'd be retired.

Nomadland: Surviving America in the Twenty-First Century

Publisher: W. W. Norton
Author: Jessica Bruder
Publication date: 2017-09

There's been much hand-wringing over the state of the American economy in recent years. After the 2008 financial crisis upended middle-class families, we now live with regular media reports of recovery and growth -- as well as rising inequality and decreased social mobility. We ponder what kind of future we're creating for our children, while generally failing to consider who has already fallen between the gaps.

Keep reading... Show less

Very few of their peers surpass Eurythmics in terms of artistic vision, musicianship, songwriting, and creative audacity. This is the history of the seminal new wave group

The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame nominating committee's yearly announcement of the latest batch of potential inductees always generates the same reaction: a combination of sputtering outrage by fans of those deserving artists who've been shunned, and jubilation by fans of those who made the cut. The annual debate over the list of nominees is as inevitable as the announcement itself.

Keep reading... Show less

Barry Lyndon suggests that all violence—wars, duels, boxing, and the like—is nothing more than subterfuge for masculine insecurities and romantic adolescent notions, which in many ways come down to one and the same thing.

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) crystalizes a rather nocturnal view of heterosexual, white masculinity that pervades much of Stanley Kubrick's films: after slithering from the primordial slime, we jockey for position in ceaseless turf wars over land, money, and women. Those wielding the largest bone/weapon claim the spoils. Despite our self-delusions about transcending our simian stirrings through our advanced technology and knowledge, we remain mired in our ancestral origins of brute force and domination—brilliantly condensed by Kubrick in one of the most famous cuts in cinematic history: a twirling bone ascends into the air only to cut to a graphic match of a space station. Ancient and modern technology collapse into a common denominator of possession, violence, and war.

Keep reading... Show less

This book offers a poignant and jarring reminder not just of the resilience of the human spirit, but also of its ability to seek solace in the materiality of one's present.

Marcelino Truong launched his autobiographical account of growing up in Saigon during the Vietnam War with the acclaimed graphic novel Such a Lovely Little War: Saigon 1961-63, originally published in French in 2012 and in English translation in 2016. That book concluded with his family's permanent relocation to London, England, as the chaos and bloodshed back home intensified.

Now Truong continues the tale with Saigon Calling: London 1963-75 (originally published in French in 2015), which follows the experiences of his family after they seek refuge in Europe. It offers a poignant illustration of what life was like for a family of refugees from the war, and from the perspective of young children (granted, Truong's family were a privileged and upper class set of refugees, well-connected with South Vietnamese and European elites). While relatives and friends struggle to survive amid the bombs and street warfare of Vietnam, the displaced narrator and his siblings find their attention consumed by the latest fashion and music trends in London. The book offers a poignant and jarring reminder not just of the resilience of the human spirit, but also of its ability to seek solace in the materiality of one's present.

Keep reading... Show less

Canadian soul singer Elise LeGrow shines on her impressive interpretation of Fontella Bass' classic track "Rescue Me".

Canadian soul singer Elise LeGrow pays tribute to the classic Chicago label Chess Records on her new album Playing Chess, which was produced by Steve Greenberg, Mike Mangini, and the legendary Betty Wright. Unlike many covers records, LeGrow and her team of musicians aimed to make new artistic statements with these songs as they stripped down the arrangements to feature leaner and modern interpretations. The clean and unfussy sound allows LeGrow's superb voice to have more room to roam. Meanwhile, these classic tunes take on new life when shown through LeGrow's lens.

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.