'Kroll Show: Seasons One and Two' Feels Like a Collection of Inside Jokes

Nick Kroll and his gaggle of comedian friends clearly think themselves hilarious; from a viewer's perspective, however, that judgment is usually questionable in Kroll Show.

Kroll Show

Director: Various
Cast: Nick Kroll, Jon Daly, Jenny Slate, Tess Broussard, Jason Mantzoukas, John Mulaney, Chelsea Peretti
Length: 418 minutes
Studio: Comedy Central
Year: 2014
Distributor: Paramount
MPAA Rating: Not Rated
UK Release Date: Import
US Release Date: 2014-12-09

Kroll Show is one of many examples of a television program and its creators believing its own hype. However, with very few exceptions, Comedy Central’s Nick Kroll vehicle seems to be more of an experiment in being unfunny than at actual humor.

We all have our own tight circle of friends with our own inside jokes and repeated one-liners that make every one of us laugh. However, if one were to repeat those lines and jokes outside of that circle, most people will simply stare at him in confusion, or perhaps react as if they are witnessing the chest burster scene from Alien. The cast and crew of Kroll Show appears to be made up entirely of Kroll’s small circle of friends who think that he is both funny and some sort of comic chameleon with a gift for morphing into various characters.

Although Kroll may be the funniest guy in his circle of friends, and perhaps even the best actor, he is neither funny nor a good actor in his namesake “comedy” program. To be fair, Kroll does have a knack for the absurd and surreal, which can, in skilled hands, lead to a great deal of comedy. Instead of going anywhere, however, Kroll’s surreal absurdity just sits there and screams “Hey, look, I’m surreal and absurd like Monty Python and The Kids in the Hall! Are you laughing yet? Hang on -- I’ll dress like a woman, then you’ll think I’m funny.”

In our own circles of friends, we also have that one really unfunny friend who tries to make the rest of us laugh by repeating the funny parts of a show. Watching Kroll Show feels as if it has been completely filtered through your least funny friend. Virtually every single sketch has the potential to be hilarious, but falls far short of the proverbial mark in execution. Most sketches are about as funny as a broken ankle, leaving the viewer more bored than they’ve ever been outside of a math class.

While Kroll and company employ skillful camera-work and editing to make many of the (oft recurring) sketches emulate the current crop of fly-on-the-wall TV reality shows, many of the “jokes” that are used therein would only be funny if they were, in fact, reality. Watching a comedy troupe come up with these as fictional moments may inspire a nod, but hardly the guffaws that the group clearly feels that it deserves.

As for the hype surrounding Kroll’s transformations into other characters: this is, in fact, just hype. Each of his characters are so identical aside from the occasional wig and facial hair change that one never forgets that one is simply watching him with the same five limited facial expressions he exclusively employs. Even the voices are virtually identical.

Case in point: In one of the long-running spoofs of the fly-on-the-wall insider reality shows focusing on wealthy families, Kroll’s pet plastic surgeon character “Dr. Armond” is ousted from his home, and a 17 year old stoner named C-Zar (also Kroll) invades the house as a new best friend for Armond’s son and love interest for Armond’s wife. However, C-Zar looks and sounds so incredibly much like the doctor that it's incredibly obvious that this character is merely Armond in disguise attempting to get his family back. That setup might have been funny, except for the fact that the mostly one-note Kroll truly intended these to be separate characters, the main difference being that one character is somewhat more lively, uses more hipster slang, and wears a lip ring. Virtually everything else about the two characters is identical, a fate shared by most other inventions on this program. Not even daylight can shine through the space between most of them.

Sketches that come close to success -- while never quite crossing the finish line -- include a Chik-Fil-A spoof commercial in which the chain’s biggest fans have to hide their love for the food in light of the organization’s politics. Here Kroll starts a prank, such as dine-and-dash, and the scene flips to an America’s Most Wanted-style investigation of said prank and “Can I finish?” chatter, a spoof of news programs on which the pundits talk over each other.

The majority of the sketches, however, fall flatter than a tortilla beneath a steam roller. “Too Much Tuna” is a recurring bit in which two old men (Kroll and John Mulaney) order a sandwich for a friend who discovers said sandwich contains... copious amounts of tuna. Some might say absurd; to this critic, it's simply not funny. “PubLIZity” is a recurring reality TV spoof in which two women named Liz (Jenny Slate and Kroll, using two of his five facial expressions for some serious variety) run an ineffectual public relations business and whine about everything. Is there potential here? Yes. Is it funny? Not really. Then there's “Rich Dicks”, in which two rich guys (John Daly and Kroll acting like Kroll) are wealthy and spoiled, well, dicks, who act like wealthy and spoiled dicks to everyone they meet… without being funny.

Often, characters from these sketches cross over and meet each other, which should be a lot of fun for the show’s actual fans. Further, many of these recurring sketches do tend to grow on the viewer, at least to the point that viewers might wonder what these characters are going to do next, not to the point that the characters are endearing or particularly funny. Each episode begins with a bespectacled Kroll performing a bit of deadpan from his standup act that seems to truly amuse Kroll, if no one else. This is, in fact, the problem with the entire show. while most of the sketches do employ absurdity and deadpan to hopefully set the audience on the edge of hysterics, the act of being absurd and deadpan is not, in itself, funny. There must be some substance and payoff for laughter to take place. Chappelle’s Show, which Kroll wrote for, got this formula right. Kroll’s own program seems to be wrapped up in the fundamentals of what they are trying to do and never quite get to the point that they are truly funny. Sadly, the most clever and interesting thing about seasons one or two is the credit sequence.

The 2014 release of Kroll Show’s first and second seasons -- the third and final season kicks off in January 2015 -- contains select audio commentaries, music videos and other extras such as “Kroll Karaoke”, “PubLIZity Interview”, and “Uncut Armond Trial”. It is difficult to say who these extras would truly appeal to such that they would be willing to fork over the $24.99 retail price for this triple DVD set, considering that nearly every episode can be watched online for free.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.