Music

Noel Gallagher’s High Flying Birds: Chasing Yesterday

Noel Gallagher may not be completely chasing yesterday, but he certainly isn't moving forward.


Noel Gallagher’s High Flying Birds

Chasing Yesterday

Label: Sour Mash
US Release Date: 2015-03-03
UK Release Date: 2015-03-02
“Lots of groups come back and it doesn’t really set the world alight. Even diehard fans are slightly unenthused. Yet it is a weird idea that simply because you are past a certain age you stop. This isn’t the 1950s, the era of the teenager, any more. I always think of the old blues men carrying on making music and having children until they are 80. Pop music doesn’t have to be a fleeting, age-related thing either.”

-- Graham Coxon, in an interview with The Guardian on the subject of Blur's The Magic Whip.

If I'm to fall

Would you be there to applaud?

Or would you hide behind them all?

Because if I am to go,

In my heart you'll grow,

and that's where you belong.

-- Oasis, "I'm Outta Time", from 2008's Dig Out Your Soul, the final Oasis album.

Three months into 2015 and the world has been subjected to both a new Noel Gallagher album as well as the news that Blur is putting out a new record, their first since 2003's Think Tank, entitled The Magic Whip. From the My Bloody Valentine reunion LP two years ago to the unearthed studio instrumentals that Pink Floyd released as an ostensible album at the end of 2014, a general message continues to thrive in the world of music: Nothing Ever Has to End. Reunions have become a regular occurrence; 2015 alone can count Blur, Sleater-Kinney, and Swerverdriver to its name, and one has good reason to leave those will be far from the last instances of "getting the band back together" this year.

Of course, 12 (Blur) or ten (Sleater-Kinney) years isn't necessarily a huge amount of time. In the case of the latter, the wait was actually quite worth it, as No Cities to Love is one of the year's sharpest rock LPs. Unfortunately, most reunion LPs veer closer to Chinese Democracy territory than anything close to No Cities to Love; see the entirely underwhelming m b v for a case in point. In that instance, My Bloody Valentine made the classic mistake of thinking that there needed something to be said after a titan of a record like 1991's Loveless, which on its own has a legacy that very few bands in the history of rock have ever topped.

Amidst the sea of reunions, Noel and Liam Gallagher have remained (thankfully) steadfast, or at least cynical and sarcastic, in their insistence that an Oasis comeback will not happen. Instead, they've both taken to various new projects: where Liam up until recently had Beady Eye, Noel has his High Flying Birds, who debuted with their self-titled record back in 2011. But while the famously quibbling siblings appear to have no plans to come back together as a (barely) amicable duo, the music they have carried on in making sounds more than a little bit like Oasis. On the aptly titled Chasing Yesterdays, the second Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds outing, the track "The Girl With the X-Ray Eyes" straight-rips from the Oasis B-side "The Masterplan". Both Beady Eye and these High Flying Birds do have some differences from Oasis' rock formula, but the general air of that Britpop juggernaut's music has never really left the brothers Gallagher.

To be fair, it's not that Oasis left off on such a bad note. Although the critical consensus has more or less settled on the narrative that after the bloated attempt to assert global musical dominance that was 1997's Be Here Now the band went into a decline, there's some real gold to be found between that record and the so-so 2008 farewell Dig Out Your Soul. For this critic's money, the utterly maligned Heathen Chemistry (2002) is actually one of Oasis' best, contrary to the general opinion that is brilliantly summed up by Grantland's Steven Hyden, who calls it "an album so inconsequential that you can’t see it when you hold it up to most mirrors."

Chasing Yesterday, much like Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds, carries on in this post-Be Here Now legacy of the Gallaghers, and it does so mostly inoffensively. But therein lies the problem. Aside from the misfire that is 2000's Standing on the Shoulders of Giants, Oasis never put out a thoroughly bad record. The luster of What's the Story (Morning Glory?) has long since faded, no doubt, but the Gallaghers, particularly Noel, have still proven quite adept at writing a rock tune. The High Flying Birds do prove to be a capable outlet for Noel to keep on keeping on with this kind of songwriting: see Chasing Yesterday's lead single "In the Heat of the Moment", whose simple but effective "na na nas" and soaring chorus vocal make it one of Noel's best in recent memory. That being said, that a legacy managed to not end poorly is no reason to continue treading the ground it had already sunk its footprints deep into.

Noel already tipped his hand when he told Rolling Stone this about the recording process: "The last record was produced by a professional producer, and it sounded expensive. This one was produced by me, so it's more rough around the edges. It's got more character. And there's a bit more guitar action on this one, where the last one was very choral and symphonic. Apart from that, they're fucking identical." With encouraging phrases like "fucking identical" and "sounded expensive" coming from the man responsible for writing the music, one would be forgiven for coming into the LP not expecting much of anything. And, in the end, not much is given. Moody midtempo numbers like "The Dying of the Light" and "The Right Stuff" are damn near interchangeable. They aren't bad tracks, per se; on their own, they are, to use Hyden's words, "totally adequate". You might bob your head to a few of these tunes. You might even have a hook get stuck in your head for a half day or so (most likely, it'll be "In the Heat of the Moment"). But it's no stretch to say that if you've heard Oasis' last two studio affairs, Dig Out Your Soul and Don't Believe the Truth (2005), you've heard most if not all of Chasing Yesterday.

In an age where much-ballyhooed reunions are becoming so recurrent as to be banal, Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds occupy a unique space. On the one hand, they aren't exactly chasing yesterday; although both Flying Birds records owe a lot to Oasis, they don't so much actively mine from that catalogue as they carry on the sound Noel is deeply acquainted with at this point. Hell, had Noel and his Birds chased the past, they'd at least be trying to build momentum in a certain direction, rather than the passive continuation of an already-established style.

Chasing Yesterday, despite alluding to the framework of time in its title, is an album of no time: not interested enough to truly mine from the past, seemingly incapable of moving forward with new ideas, and too stuck in old rhythms to be called music of its time. Noel Gallagher has basically made an album with the format of a random Oasis song generator. Sure, there's a friendly and even inviting familiarity to this brand of rock 'n' roll, but there's not a lot of reason to dive into a set of new tunes when all they do is point you to the shadow of the classics that loom over them.

Splash image: press photo by Lawrence Watson.

5

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

If The Prince of Nothingwood will popularly be remembered for celebrating the creative spirit of its star Salim Shaheen, it is equally an important communication on Afghanistan, it's culture and its people.

"Now I am just more tired and poor. So no, I haven't changed. I'm just older and more tired," says French radio journalist and documentarian Sonia Kronlund, as she looks back on the experience of making The Prince of Nothingwood (2017).

Joining Salim Shaheen, the most popular and prolific actor-director-producer in Afghanistan on his 111th no budget feature, Kronlund documents the week-long shoot and the events surrounding it. She crafts an insight into a larger than life persona, yet amidst the comedy and theatricality of Shaheen and his troupe of collaborators, she uncovers the heavier tones of the everyday reality of war and patriarchal oppression. If The Prince of Nothingwood will popularly be remembered for celebrating the creative spirit of its star, it is equally an important communication on Afghanistan, it's culture and its people. Alongside the awareness of the country cultivated by mainstream media news outlets, Kronlund's film offers an insight into a country that can humanise the prejudice and xenophobic tendencies of a western perspective towards Afghanistan.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image