Shooting Back: Kamel Daoud's Reply to Albert Camus' 'The Stranger'

There is going to be a lot of hype about The Meursault Investigation, and you should believe every word of it.

The Meursault Investigation

Publisher: Other
Length: 116 pages
Author: Kamel Daoud
Price: $14.95
Format: Paperback
Publication date: 2015-06

The late professor Robert C. Solomon once remarked that Albert Camus' The Stranger was a sort of cultural barometer. One generation of students would find Camus's Meursault a hero, a rebel who refused to play society's game and follow the script (which is how Camus himself intended Meursault: as "a man who, without any heroics, accepts death for the sake of truth"). Another generation, Solomon said, would find Meursault simply despicable.

When I first read The Stranger as a high school student, I was enamored with and awed by Meursault. His alienation mirrored my own, and his refusal to lie for the sake of propriety appealed to my adolescent sense of angst. Years later, when Stuart Gilbert's translation was supplanted by Matthew Ward's, I read it again. Ward's Meursault was much less sympathetic. Or perhaps I had changed; Meursault seemed criminally anti-social rather than alienated, and his selective honesty a sort of cruelty.

The Stranger is a profound and troublesome book. Now a teacher myself, I too have found the book to be a barometer, but one that reveals more about the individual student than about any particular cohort of students. In my classes, reactions to Meursault tend to be categorical and emphatic: students either love Meursault, or they hate him, which both enhances and detracts from our discussion of the book, because Meursault is such a strange character that Camus' metaphysical views about the Absurd, his phenomenological narration, his implicit social criticism -- all of these are overshadowed by Meursault.

When I ask my students about "the Arab" I am almost invariably met with blank stares.

In Kamel Daoud's The Meursault Investigation, the Arab stares back, sad and bitter.

Not the dead Arab left on the beach, of course, but Harun, the dead man's brother. Harun has also read The Stranger, read it repeatedly, intimately, because it tells the story of his brother's death. "The original guy was such a good story teller, he managed to make people forget his crime, whereas the other one was a poor illiterate created by God only, it seems, to take a bullet and return to dust -- an anonymous person who didn't even have the time to be given a name."

Daoud's extended monologue is both a reply and an homage to Camus' The Stranger, but it's more than simply an engagement with Camus, who is clearly a literary hero and a nemesis for Daoud. In style and tone, the novella is closer to Camus' The Fall, while the plot is a funhouse mirror of The Stranger reflecting back the original in twisted and illuminating ways.

Like Meursault, Harun shot and killed a man, a French colonial he tells us was named Joseph. There was a woman in Harun's life, too. Not a Marie, but a Meriem. And Harun's meeting with an imam is every bit as volatile and vituperative as Meursault's was with the priest. Yet there's nothing gimmicky about what Daoud has done here. To understand The Meursault Investigation one must have read The Stranger. Yet, having read The Stranger, one appreciates what Daoud has brought to the text and what a fine writer he is himself.

Interestingly, Daoud's narrator never mentions Camus by name, nor does he use the term pied noir to refer to French colonials, but the legacy of colonialism haunts the narrator as much as his brother's ghost. The author-murderer Meursault, "he was el-roumi the foreigner, the stranger."

"When the murderer leaves prison, he writes a book that becomes famous, in which he recounts how he stood up to God, a priest, and the absurd. You can turn that story in all directions, it doesn't hold up. It's the story of a crime, but the Arab isn't even killed in it -- well, he is killed, but barely, delicately, with the fingertips, as it were. He's the second most important character in the book, but he has no name, no face, no words. Does that make any sense to you, educated man that you are? The story's absurd! It's a blatant lie."

The post-colonial discourse in the book is subtle and nuanced. Even in the narrator's passing comments we recognize its complexity. For example, while Harun initially learns the colonizer's language in order to understand Meursault's book and gather clues about his brother's murderer, doing so is actually liberating as the colonizer's tongue ironically becomes a conduit to Harun's own existential awakening. "Books and your hero's language gradually enabled me to name things differently and to organize the world with my own words."

What he becomes is a freethinker.

Meursault hated Sundays, but for Harun "it's the Friday prayer hour I detest the most... It's not a day when God rested, it's a day when he decided to run away and never come back. I know this from the hollow sound that persists after them men's prayer, and from their faces pressed against the window of supplication. And from their coloring, the complexion of people who respond to fear of the absurd with zeal. As for me, I don't like anything that rises to heaven, I only like things affected by gravity. I'll go so far as to say I abhor religions. All of them! Because they falsify the weight of the world."

Though Daoud chides Western readers throughout, his criticism of fellow Algerians, and more specifically his repudiation of organized religion and fundamentalism, have made him a controversial author and resulted in a fatwa being issued against him -- a sad fact that would surely have sickened Camus, because, despite the animosity, there's also a profound humanity begging to be heard in The Meursault Investigation.

"What's the point of putting up with adversity, suffering, or even an enemy's hatred if you can resolve everything with a few simple gunshots? The unpublished murderer develops a certain inclination to laziness. But there's something irreparable as well: the crime forever compromises both love and the possibility of loving." His narrator continues: "Indeed, my friend, the only verse in the Quran that resonates with me is this: 'If you kill a single person, it is as if you have killed the whole of mankind'."

The Meursault Investigation has already won several literary prizes, and the promotional materials note that theatrical and film versions of the book are already planned in France. John Cullen's fluent translation will now introduce Anglo-American audiences to Daoud's brash and sharp-witted narrator, whose colloquial English nonetheless retains its essential "Arab-ness". Readers may very well conclude that the man who truly, without any heroics, accepts the threat of death for the sake of truth is neither Meursault nor Harun, but Daoud.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.