Film

Cannes 2015: 'Amy' Follows Late Singer's Descent

Steven Zeitchik
Los Angeles Times (TNS)

In Amy, a new documentary about the late star Amy Winehouse, we learn just how unique and complicated a descent can be.

CANNES, France — The history of pop music is filled with far too many untimely demises. But for all the cultural lumping together of these tragedies, they’re hardly as similar as we tend to believe.

In Amy, a new documentary about the late star Amy Winehouse, we learn just how unique and complicated a descent can be.

That narrative helped the film earn a warm reception from critics and audiences at the Cannes Film Festival, where it premiered ahead of a June release in theaters. But the portrayal turns out to sit a lot less well with some of those closest to its subject.

Winehouse was the preternaturally talented singer-songwriter who won accolades for her debut, Frank, when she was barely 20 and was considered a budding soul great just three years later, in 2006, with her Grammy-winning Back to Black. But she would never record another studio album and died in 2011 at age 27 from alcohol poisoning.

Directed by fellow Londoner Asif Kapadia, the film paints a portrait of Winehouse that goes well beyond the rise and fall stories of other music-world tragic figures. Yes, there were enablers, such as ex-husband Blake Fielder-Civil, who said in a 2013 media interview that he introduced her to hard drugs. (She became convinced, one friend said, that she had to be “on his level.”).

And Winehouse’s father, Mitch, is presented unflatteringly in Amy as a hard-driving, self-glorifying stage parent who pushed his daughter to keep performing even when it was clear she needed help.

But the nuanced argument Amy makes is that it was a broader set of cultural factors that were also culpable in her undoing. Winehouse was subject to a relentless stream of late-night television jokes, paparazzi stalking, social-media snarking and tabloid drooling, and it soon overwhelmed her.

“It was a situation where she’d be a guest on a show one night and then mocked on that show the next or where a lot of people were participating in what became a kind of sport,” Kapadia said at Cannes. “And that’s one of the main things I wanted to accomplish. I want people to walk out feeling a little angry and a little complicit and a little guilty.”

Kapadia became involved after her record company approached James Gay-Rees, the director’s producing partner, with an idea to tell Winehouse’s story. The executives were taken with Kapadia’s earlier film, the race-car documentary Senna, and wanted a similar in-depth treatment.

As with that film, Kapadia’s general approach is to forgo talking heads in favor of archival material. In this film he had to rely on audio from interviews — the production conducted more than 100 of them. Kapadia layers that over the footage so the documentary seems to be narrated as the events are happening instead of reflected upon later.

There is plenty of time, especially early in the film, devoted to Winehouse’s luminous personality — an opening sequence shows her taking over a home video with a star’s charm and assurance, effortlessly channeling Marilyn Monroe.

And there’s much in it that demonstrates her musical acumen. Winehouse wrote lyrics to many of her songs in longhand, and Kapadia shows snippets of those while superimposing personal lyrics over her performances, in a way that both moves the narrative forward and underscores her talent.

But the tale soon turns dark as Winehouse begins withdrawing, physically and emotionally, into her addiction. The film chronicles this in part by showing the reaction of family, friends and her representatives — all saying, basically, it wasn’t on them to do more.

That includes Mitch Winehouse, who — though a figure Amy Winehouse clearly adored and felt close to — at a moment when she seemed to need rest or rehab, appeared to push her to do more shows.

That depiction led to strong objections from the Winehouse family, which initially co-operated with the production but shortly before Cannes released a statement saying that they’d like to “disassociate themselves from the forthcoming film about their much missed and beloved Amy.”

The statement added that the family believed the film “is both misleading and contains some basic untruths.”

In a subsequent interview with the Guardian, Mitch Winehouse elaborated that “they are trying to portray me in the worst possible light” and noted that the film suggested he didn’t think Winehouse needed to go to rehab generally, when a comment he made to that effect was about a specific and more healthy moment in her life — an “at that time,” he said, was edited out.

For their part, the filmmakers said they had no ax to grind.

“I know it’s too soon for some people,” Kapadia said. “I do want people to see everyone for who they were and have a form of debate about the world we live in and what we do to people. I’m not trying to make anyone look bad.”

Gay-Rees said one reason he believes Amy is evoking such intense emotions has less to do with the portrayal than the facts.

“It’s a really complicated story with no good guys or bad guys,” he said by phone from London on Thursday. “Even Amy herself was a complicated, contradictory character. She didn’t present the same way to any two people. We’d interview one person and they’d say she was the most unbelievably attentive caring soul, and then someone else would say she was a hard-core gangster.”

One of the biggest questions — whether her compulsions were inextricable from her creativity — remains ambiguous in the film.

Gay-Rees said he believed she was someone “who had all this talent ... but she had to have chaos in her life and possibly couldn’t be a great artist without it.”

Kapadia said it’s a question he still struggles with. “I don’t think I can offer simple answers,” he said. “I just want people to look at someone who is so funny and so intelligent and so sharp. And I do want all of us, a little bit, to look at what we did.”

In the wake of Malcolm Young's passing, Jesse Fink, author of The Youngs: The Brothers Who Built AC/DC, offers up his top 10 AC/DC songs, each seasoned with a dash of backstory.

In the wake of Malcolm Young's passing, Jesse Fink, author of The Youngs: The Brothers Who Built AC/DC, offers up his top 10 AC/DC songs, each seasoned with a dash of backstory.

Keep reading... Show less

Pauline Black may be called the Queen of Ska by some, but she insists she's not the only one, as Two-Tone legends the Selecter celebrate another stellar album in a career full of them.

Being commonly hailed as the "Queen" of a genre of music is no mean feat, but for Pauline Black, singer/songwriter of Two-Tone legends the Selecter and universally recognised "Queen of Ska", it is something she seems to take in her stride. "People can call you whatever they like," she tells PopMatters, "so I suppose it's better that they call you something really good!"

Keep reading... Show less

Morrison's prose is so engaging and welcoming that it's easy to miss the irreconcilable ambiguities that are set forth in her prose as ineluctable convictions.

It's a common enough gambit in science fiction. Humans come across a race of aliens that appear to be entirely alike and yet one group of said aliens subordinates the other, visiting violence upon their persons, denigrating them openly and without social or legal consequence, humiliating them at every turn. The humans inquire why certain of the aliens are subjected to such degradation when there are no discernible differences among the entire race of aliens, at least from the human point of view. The aliens then explain that the subordinated group all share some minor trait (say the left nostril is oh-so-slightly larger than the right while the "superior" group all have slightly enlarged right nostrils)—something thatm from the human vantage pointm is utterly ridiculous. This minor difference not only explains but, for the alien understanding, justifies the inequitable treatment, even the enslavement of the subordinate group. And there you have the quandary of Otherness in a nutshell.

Keep reading... Show less
3

A 1996 classic, Shawn Colvin's album of mature pop is also one of best break-up albums, comparable lyrically and musically to Joni Mitchell's Hejira and Bob Dylan's Blood on the Tracks.

When pop-folksinger Shawn Colvin released A Few Small Repairs in 1996, the music world was ripe for an album of sharp, catchy songs by a female singer-songwriter. Lilith Fair, the tour for women in the music, would gross $16 million in 1997. Colvin would be a main stage artist in all three years of the tour, playing alongside Liz Phair, Suzanne Vega, Sheryl Crow, Sarah McLachlan, Meshell Ndegeocello, Joan Osborne, Lisa Loeb, Erykah Badu, and many others. Strong female artists were not only making great music (when were they not?) but also having bold success. Alanis Morissette's Jagged Little Pill preceded Colvin's fourth recording by just 16 months.

Keep reading... Show less
9

Frank Miller locates our tragedy and warps it into his own brutal beauty.

In terms of continuity, the so-called promotion of this entry as Miller's “third" in the series is deceptively cryptic. Miller's mid-'80s limited series The Dark Knight Returns (or DKR) is a “Top 5 All-Time" graphic novel, if not easily “Top 3". His intertextual and metatextual themes resonated then as they do now, a reason this source material was “go to" for Christopher Nolan when he resurrected the franchise for Warner Bros. in the mid-00s. The sheer iconicity of DKR posits a seminal work in the artist's canon, which shares company with the likes of Sin City, 300, and an influential run on Daredevil, to name a few.

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image