Wes Montgomery: In the Beginning

Photo by Chuk Stewart

For Montgomery and those of the era, music was one of the dominant ways in which black Americans could show their pride and sense of accomplishment.

Wes Montgomery

In the Beginning

Label: Resonance
US Release Date: 2015-05-12

Most jazz guitar fans consider Wes Montgomery one of the genre’s legendary heroes because of a string of excellent albums he made as a band leader during the sixties before his untimely death in 1968. His influence extended far beyond jazz as rock legends such as Stevie Ray Vaughan and Jimi Hendrix have cited Montgomery’s importance to their style of playing. Resonance Records has collected 26 rare and never-been-released tracks spanning 1949 to 1958 on two-CD and three-LP sets appropriately called In the Beginning. They reveal a much different side of the man for two reasons: he was a younger person still working on finding his distinctive voice, and the fact that life in the fifties was much different than it was in the sixties and to a certain extent, the music reflects the times.

Montgomery’s known best for his smooth style. During the sixties he turned popular tunes such as ("I Say a Little Prayer", "Windy", "and "Eleanor Rigby"), into soft and easy listening while also giving the music an exuberant edge. It may have been slick, but it was charming in its sophisticated effortlessness. There’s nothing like that here. Most of these cuts were caught by a fan with a portable tape recorder during live gigs at Indianapolis. Modern technology has turned these tapes into hi-fidelity sound with crowd noises and other imperfections unnoticeably in the background. The resulting music is much more frantic and driven than his 1960s work as he plays bebop and other contemporary styles of the post-war era.

The first disc contains recordings of Montgomery playing at the Turf Club as part of a quintet that included his brothers Buddy and Monk Montgomery on piano and bass respectively. Sometimes the band swings, as on “How High the Moon”, but as with that song there is usually a place in the middle where Montgomery plays a solo that goes way beyond the conventional melody and rhythm and seems to exist in a space all of its own. Something in the way he fingers the chords creates a sense of urgency and wonder as to how he long can he keep it up and where the heck is going. The precision of his playing is breathtaking.

Even on the quieter tunes, such as “What is There to Say” and “Six Bridges to Cross”, Montgomery plays hot more than cool. His playing intensifies what’s going on. As the liner notes say (and the liner notes deserve special mention as the 55-page booklet includes a large piece by Grammy Award winning journalist Ashley Kahn, producer Quincy Jones, and rock guitarist Pete Townshend) he was a black jazz musician performing live during the time of a great national Civil Rights struggle. For him and those of the era, music was one of the dominant ways in which black Americans could show their pride and sense of accomplishment. Jazz was understood as a place where black Americans had always stood in the forefront.

The showpiece of the second disc is the five-track set produced by Quincy Jones for Epic Records in 1955 at New York’s Columbia Studios. Montgomery and band take on everything from Cole Porter’s “Love for Sale” to the self-penned “Far Wes”. As might be expected from a Jones production, the sound is crisp and uncluttered. Montgomery takes fast rolls down the fret board. But one can clearly hear each note. And when he does take it easier, he doesn’t slow down as much as play prettier by adding frills and such.

In the Beginning will please jazz aficionados more than casual fans. Despite the relatively high level of playing and the excellence of the sonic restoration, this is jazz for jazz fans -- unlike Montgomery’s 1960s recordings that had crossover appeal. Purists may rejoice. Others should stick to Montgomery’s later work.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.