PopMatters Seeks Music Critics and Essayists: If you're a smart, historically-minded music critic or essayist, let your voice be heard by our quality readership.
PopMatters Seeks Music Critics and Essayists: If you're a smart, historically-minded music critic or essayist, let your voice be heard by our quality readership.
APPLY HERE APPLY HERE
APPLY HERE APPLY HERE
195078-where-have-you-gone-monsieur-hulot
Jacques Tati

Where Have You Gone, Monsieur Hulot?

Persistent themes of Jacques Tati’s films were work and play, two forces in conflicting or complementary relationships, always inspiring creativity regardless of configuration.

The films of Jacques Tati have been part of the Criterion Collection for years, but the DVDs have gone out of print for periods of time. That Tati’s films would drift in and out of availability is consistent with the persona of his most famous creation, Monsieur Hulot, a man whose presence signifies various types of absence. In frame but out of place and out of time, Hulot shares many qualities with his creator. Tati is said to have died a “bitter man”, unappreciated in his place and time. The celebration of Tati in the decades since his death in 1982 includes recent home video releases by BFI and Studiocanal, culminating in Criterion’s The Complete Jacques Tati on DVD and Blu-ray. The box set contains reissues of Monsieur Hulot’s Holiday (1953), Mon Oncle (1958), PlayTime (1967), and Trafic (1971), as well as debut editions of Jour de fête (1949), Parade (1974), and several short films.

Tati’s first feature, Jour de fête, was shot in Sainte-Sévère-sur-Indre with an all-hands-on-deck spirit and included townspeople as actors. Tati was eager to improve on his earlier efforts in cinema, specifically short films that marked a significant change of form compared with the mime/music hall stylings of his early career as a performer. As a writer and the director and star of the film, Tati brought to his first major feature a sense of control that would become characteristic of his approach and arguably responsible for his career highs and lows.

The plots of Tati’s films were minimal, and Jour de fête is no exception. An event (the arrival of a traveling fair) and a character (a postman) are the engines that power the film. Tati’s themes, however, were potent enough to poke up through the slapstick; volleys that would stay aloft through decades of filmmaking. Jour de fête is about work that is never quite finished, including that related to life’s leisurely moments, which are, by contrast, fleeting. It’s also a film about progress that questions popular postwar conceptions of progress.

img-37183

Jour de fête (1949)

In Jour de fête, animals are able to sense human folly and/or force humans to slow down. Tati’s “François” is a productive postman, but the chaos he creates counteracts his progress. He helps to erect a flagpole, but the story of the pole overtakes the fact of its implantation. Paint is never entirely dry. Letters are never entirely delivered. The motion picture show that functions as a main attraction of the fair allows Tati the director to comment in some way on the coming of sound to film — a technological innovation Tati used to perfect the aims of silent film. In his book on Tati, writer David Bellos recounts that silent cinema comedy master Buster Keaton “reportedly said that Tati’s work with sound had carried on the true tradition of silent cinema.”

The motion picture show within the fair of Jour de fête also introduces another commentary on the theme of progress that compares and contrasts national approaches to service. “Yes, the Americans are turning postmen into acrobats,” boasts the newsreel that showcases the efficiency of the American postal service. François, who allows a goat to eat a telegram and who spends much of the film carrying around a busted tire, compares unfavorably to this impossible new American standard. His “American style” delivery in the film’s third act is one of frenzied speed. Suddenly, there’s no time to reflect on the job done (as with the flagpole of the first act). In the end, a child replaces him as the would-be postman. It’s a funny switcheroo, but also one that carries a slight caution of growing up too quickly.

In Monsieur Hulot’s Holiday, Tati has retired François and taken on Hulot, who is introduced to audiences while on vacation. This is to say Hulot is specifically not working, unlike the vacationers surrounding him. They remain connected to their labors and other distractions despite the gorgeous scenery of Saint-Marc-sur-Mer. The opening minutes of the film feature families in a mad rush to reach a destination. The speed with which they switch train platforms is impossibly fast, but Tati proves their movement with his directorial hand. Their movement is an evolution of a similar technique Tati used to speed François along in Jour de fête. The director would continue to focus on groups in motion throughout his filmography.

A frequently occurring interaction in Monsieur Hulot’s Holiday is that of other holidaymakers reacting to Hulot’s distracting or disrupting presence, or to different representations of the man himself. He is his car that makes too much noise. He is the wind that blows the sitting room into disarray. When Hulot passes by, anyone who takes their eyes off of a present activity to observe him returns to a ruined activity. His own luck with objects is no better. His suitcase and backpack antics are physical comedy reminiscent of Billy Bevan. He repeatedly fails to mount a horse. He splits a boat in half.

Again, however, this slapstick combines with technique and theme to raise the film to the highest ranks of comic film art. Two of the funniest and strangest moments in the film involve characters reduced to frozen objects. One of these scenes features a man, Schmutz, who is taking a family photograph when a business call intervenes. The family is left standing, posing for a picture that will never be taken. The second instance finds Hulot distracting an exercise instructor at the precise time the exercisers are all standing with knees bent. Their workout is suspended in some tendon-testing purgatory while Hulot commands the instructor’s attention.

img-37183

Monsieur Hulot’s Holiday (1953)

Tati also avoids the tendency of some silent and sound film comedians to extend a gag beyond its point of maximum effectiveness. Several times within the film, he cuts to another shot, action, or scene at the comedic apex of one joke or another. The most effective of these edits takes place within a tennis sequence that will be familiar to anyone who has seen Tati’s mime routines involving sports. There’s a short sequence of a girl whose polite conversation with others is cruelly repaid with a tennis ball’s direct hit to the head. There is no doubt Tati could have gotten more laughs out of the scene, but he lets the impact and immediate falling action determine the timing of the cut and then he’s quickly on to the next routine.

Throughout, Tati frames activities, days, and nights with more contemplative views of the setting that invite deeper thought about why some people cannot turn off the busyness and seriousness while away on vacation. Schmutz is too concerned for his business to enjoy the sea. A young man (the sort that will populate the films of Richard Linklater) also misses out by using his time at the beach to criticize the progress of the bourgeoisie. Tati called Hulot “shy” and “sweet,” but the irate vacationers inconvenienced by his loud jazz music and explosive fireworks would characterize him as anything but. The truth is that he’s simply incompatible. To borrow a quotation from Brian Wilson and Tony Asher, Hulot “just wasn’t made for these times.”

Monsieur Hulot’s Holiday offers the zaniness of Hulot sharing a single common location with others. However, Tati’s next film Mon oncle sees Hulot in his little space on the fringe of a disappearing way of life before letting him loose among his family members within modern, suburbanized, domestic, and industrial work spaces. He’s not lost, but he is ill-equipped, like an interplanetary traveler trying to survive a hostile atmosphere. His only ally is a child.

The distance between Hulot and the Arpel family (his sister, her husband, and their child Gérard) is marked by decay. Hulot’s home is awkward, but its pulse is warm. The place and its people move to the beat of tradition. Yet he is in a district that will soon be overtaken by the construction and a newer, ostensibly better way of living. Tati associates the period of renovation with images like dogs eating trash. The results, like modern houses and structures, do not seem to justify the costs of modernity.

Mr. and Mrs. Arpel are adherents of this new way of living. Mrs. Arpel, in particular, never tires of showing off her home and its bells and whistles. The most frequently occurring sight gag in the film is a fish fountain that spews blue water into the air. Mrs. Arpel reveals her judgment of the social status of her guests by her selective activation of the fountain. Concerning the house, her mantra is, “It’s very practical. Everything’s connected.” Given Hulot’s penchant for causing chaos, his introduction into an environment in which everything is connected creates the possibility that he’ll bring the whole house down. His encounter with the fish fountain creates a series of domestic catastrophes.

Tati styles much of the Arpel’s world at home and at work (Mr. Arpel’s plastics manufacturing factory) as being drained of color or infused with unnatural color. The presentation of factory and office settings could nearly be mistaken for black and white photography, were it not for a few sources of chrominance like skin tones. Because of the film’s attention to industrial alienation, sections of Mon oncle play like a comedic variation on Fritz Lang’s Metropolis.

Hulot’s visit to his family and short tenure as an employee of the factory are also memorable for their unforgiving soundscapes. The factory and the kitchen assault one’s sense of hearing. A classic routine from the film finds Hulot in the kitchen, testing its state of the art appliances. He finds out that even in a futuristic kitchen, sometimes a glass is just a glass.

Despite his failure to fit in with the adult worlds of the Arpels, Hulot is a hero of sorts to young Gérard. Mon oncle is not a dramatic film. But its scenario of a father resenting his son’s attachment to another father figure (in this case, Gérard’s affection for his uncle Hulot) does inject the film with the appearance of a dramatic plot. It also sets up a bit of momentary but moving father-son bonding at the film’s conclusion.

Gérard and his friends escape to the messier part of the city, where the dogs run as they wish and there’s still dust to kick around. Whereas Gérard looks imprisoned in his modern home with his parents’ ridiculous affectations, he is free and happy outside of the suburbs. A game involving whistling at passersby to distract them and force an encounter with a lamppost is particularly characteristic of Tati’s humor. Tati was known to come up with script ideas by observing the behavior of everyday people. The lamppost routine is a game of observation. Its repetitions and variations within the plot of Mon oncle are numerous and every single one earns a laugh.

img-37183

Mon Oncle (1958)

Once Upon a Time … “Mon oncle”, a documentary included in the supplementary features on the disc, features interviews and footage that illuminate the complexities of Hulot. One point of discussion is that though Hulot is the title or central character of these films, he remains indistinct. His face is often obscured. Another observation is that his own solitary life is rather sad or unhealthy in some respects, which is at odds with the his comedic function when in the presence of others.

The most interesting theory explored in the documentary is the idea of Hulot is a sort of angel. This idea seems true to some extent, though Tati himself cautioned against forcing the comparison. There is evidence of this angel theory in Mon oncle, as Hulot is present in a crucial manner in the life of young Gérard, and yet otherwise incompatible with his environment. He’s unable to share in the privileges and the position of most of the adults around him.

The Play Goes On

Tati’s next feature, PlayTime spins the humor of observation in a fresh direction, which is to poke fun at the observations offered by American tourists in Paris. From the moment one of them mistakenly identifies a “Mr. Hulot” among the passersby, we could understand their viewpoint of modern Paris to be an additional lens through which Tati sees the changes of his world. One of Tati’s methods of commenting on the popularity of Hulot was to include possible doubles for the character in the films. In this case, the real Hulot arrives after the fake Hulot has left the picture. There will be several other doubles in the widescreen compositions that create the overwhelming visual experience of PlayTime.

It is no exaggeration to state that Tati built his own small city for the production of the film. The film is structured around locations that all required extensive construction and the use of space sufficient to satisfy Tati’s approach of shooting in wide compositions/long shots, this time on 70 mm film stock. While the frame of PlayTime has expanded beyond the limits of Tati’s earlier work, he uses the expansion to push some of his common themes forward. There are specific links to the problems of progress and modernity that were explored in his first few features. Glass is a ubiquitous structural element of PlayTime’s sets. Here, glass is emblematic of the illusory nature of the promises of progress; it is transparent, but still confining. Mon oncle ended with a billowing curtain, a final goodbye to the place where kids and dogs run free. PlayTime removes the curtain and erects gargantuan windows.

img-37184

PlayTime (1967)

And as the structures have grown, so the colorlessness has spread. Sometimes flesh is the only distinct color in the frame. One of the results of watching Tati’s films on Blu-ray is that some previously hidden details become so much more visible that they grow in meaning. Some of these are simply effects or seams being revealed, as in Monsieur Hulot’s Holiday, with the now obvious fishing line attached to a floating can or the jarring composite image of a man about to be trapped in a car.

In PlayTime, however, the enhanced picture quality highlights cutouts or artificial figures installed to represent humans. Some of them appear to be in full color and others in monochrome. It’s possible that Tati was so concerned with filling his constructed “Tativille” with activity that these inanimate figures were placed in the background to trick the eye into seeing living people. But the improved resolution and new digital restoration have resulted in an uncanny Tin Man quality to these background characters. It’s as if they were once living but now have frozen or turned into just another fixture within this super-modern environment.

One of the major sequences of PlayTime involves a trade fair, a setting that motivates several product placements like Omega watches. As Tati’s style of shooting is to stay wide almost all the time, the experience of viewing PlayTime is much like visiting a crowded product exhibition of this sort. Everywhere one looks, there’s a new attraction to behold. Some of them, such as noisy chairs, call back to jokes from earlier Tati films. A broom with headlights seems like the logical next step forward for Mon oncle’s self-propelled vacuum.

The buildings of PlayTime seem to have been dropped onto Paris like obelisks intended to dwarf or extinguish the traditional architecture and monuments. We see the Eiffel Tower and other landmarks in the reflections of glass doors opening and closing. Posters that line the glass walls advertise other destinations such as London, the USA, Mexico, Hawaii, and Stockholm. All of these feature the same ugly buildings, with only tiny individual features to indicate the unique histories and geographies of the destinations.

Another sequence, shot from the outside and looking inside an “ultramodern” apartment building, is perhaps Tati’s chief stroke of genius regarding the humor of observation. The tenants of the building have sacrificed all privacy for the privilege of living in the latest, greatest setting. Their apartments are on or clearly visible from the street level, meaning anyone walking by is able to (indeed, could hardly avoid) seeing every aspect of their lives. The viewer of PlayTime shares this perspective, and Tati uses the perspective to execute a brilliant sequence about the subjectivity of watching people, watching people.

A much-lauded restaurant/club sequence, on the other hand, is the most trying sequence in all of Tati’s filmography. Whereas the activity of the film to this point overwhelms the senses in somewhat manageable doses, the “Royal Garden” sequence goes on and on, mining a restaurant under construction for what seems to be every single comic possibility imaginable. In defense of this interminable quality, the time spent in the restaurant creates in the viewer the same feeling of those required to keep the service coming for the privileged patrons. The workers and waiters trying to do their jobs in an out-of-control setting have no release from the demands of others’ leisure.

To drive home this point, Tati includes a waiter whose ripped pants cause him to stand outside of the action and subsequently to inherit imperfections and indignities that befall other servers. Additionally, the restaurant sequence is arguably Hulot’s most “successful” assimilation into the modern world, which is tragic in light of the hopeful opposition his angel persona created in earlier works. Indeed, human sadness is his prize for assimilating, as his would-be American girlfriend disappears into traffic and onto another destination with only a souvenir from Hulot.

PlayTime’s concluding jumble of traffic sets up Trafic, a film that could be viewed in the context of the costly PlayTime’s failure to make money. Tati’s first direct comment on the commercial realities of his cinema occurs at the very beginning of the film, as the name “Mr. Hulot” appears in large letters on the screen against an image of vehicle assembly. The implication is that Mr. Hulot is a factory product whose success is calculated by profitability and efficiency. But Tati is not so reactionary that he refuses to adjust his approach, and his modifications help to make Trafic a success.

Compared to PlayTime, Trafic is limited in visual scope and expanded in plot. These are welcome changes for the variety they bring to Tati’s output. The plot concerns the attempt to transport a prototype camper-car from Paris to Amsterdam for an international automobile show. Tati highlights several connections between humans and automobiles. A recurring example is the comparison of vehicles’ start-stop motion with that of humans who are dependent on them. A wide shot of the empty auto-show grounds features businessmen in the ongoing activity of casually taking a few steps and then pausing to carefully step over wires.

In Trafic, Hulot is once again the distracting presence, impeding others’ work because they are busy watching him. And the number of Hulot doubles has increased dramatically, as if Tati couldn’t help but to sarcastically saturate the frame with them in response to the character’s popularity. Yet aside from those references to uses of the character that have proven successful in past films, Tati adds a new quality that is integral to the plot. Here, Hulot is not simply a man out of place, trapped in a world not built for him. Here, he is the designer of the central product, a camper-car so crazily imagined it could only come from the brain of an irrepressible individual accustomed to making do in a shrinking world. That is to say, Mr. Hulot.

img-37184

Trafic (1971)

Of course, the trip to Amsterdam is beset by troubles. The vehicle transporting Hulot’s vehicle fails on a number of occasions, including a broken clutch caused by the stop-start action. Gone is the country road of Jour de fête, on which vehicles slowed for animals. In the world of Trafic, the automobiles threaten to run the animals over. One of the most memorable set pieces in all of Tati’s filmography is a collision of vehicles in which the true spectacle comes from human beings’ silent, individualized responses to not dying in the road. Another even more sublime use of the human body in motion is that of two men in a garage, working on a truck, balletically mimicking the motion of the Apollo 11 astronauts.

The final minutes of Trafic are about Tati’s career. Hulot stands in a setting/frame full of glass that might as well be a Tativille exterior. His boss fires him. Immediately after Hulot is dismissed, the audience sees his creation become a hit with the people, who rush to place orders for the camper-car. At the time of Trafic’s production, Tati’s career was not quite over. But his awareness of his trajectory as a filmmaker was so affected by PlayTime’s commercial performance that he was able to create within Trafic a prediction or declaration that he would only succeed after his retirement/death/stepping out of the spotlight.

For Parade, his final completed film, Tati uses his remaining time in that spotlight to revive the live entertainment style from his music hall past. The setting is a circus and Tati is the ringmaster. But to say Parade is merely a filmed circus is to sell short the encompassing concept Tati explores, which is that of reciprocal participation. To fully enjoy any of Tati’s films requires some measure of “work” on the part of an active, observant audience. But in Parade, the spectators get drawn directly into the show. Everyone is a clown. The line between observer and observed dissolves.

Tati’s sporting mimes are impressively athletic for a person of any age. To consider that he was in his late sixties when performing and directing Parade is to be reminded of his dedication to pleasing audiences. The various talk show appearances that supplement this box set feature Tati performing some of these same routines to the delight of hosts and audiences. Certain mime routines, such as the one involving fishing, require no accompaniments whatsoever. Tati commands the attention of an audience against a completely white backdrop. A slow-motion tennis mime combines elements from his earlier features, specifically the tennis antics of Monsieur Hulot’s Holiday and the Apollo 11 choreography of Trafic.

Persistent themes of Tati’s films were work and play, two forces in conflicting or complementary relationships, always inspiring creativity regardless of configuration. In “Jacques Tati, Historian,” an essay included in the box set, Kristin Ross writes of “the psychotechnics of exhilaration and fatigue that occur whenever groups or individuals [are] obliged to adjust to abrupt changes to … leisure and labor.” Tati was able to illustrate these forces and changes in multiple ways, and in Parade he conveys them through the activity of an altogether different construction than that which threatens the good old disappearing spaces of Mon oncle.

In Parade, the onstage performers create music from hammering and building the colorful sets. Work is play. At the end of the film, two children that have participated in the circus have the final act. They make music with paint cans, free to make a mess, free to be children. The clown and his crowd have departed, but the play goes on.

PopMatters