The Low Lows: Shining Violence

Jer Fairall

Complete and utter chaos has never sounded so intentional.

The Low Lows

Shining Violence

Label: Monotreme
US Release Date: 2008-09-09
UK Release Date: 2008-03-03

The Low Lows’ Parker Noon took his band’s name from the third and final album by his previous outfit, the dreamy New York duo Parker and Lily that he fronted with his wife of fourteen years, Lily Wolfe. When their marriage hit the rocks during the making of the album, the band ended right along with their union, and their fans were left with a strange dissonance. Released in early 2005, The Low Lows was generally regarded as the band’s most fully realized and emotionally vibrant outing, but was the strength of the music a result of the band’s inner romantic turmoil (which has, after all, fueled classics from Rumours to Shoot Out the Lights), or simply the natural product of their ongoing refinement? The couple’s dissolution guaranteed that we would never find out, threatening to leave the band’s career arc forever incomplete.

For his part, Noon has done more than enough to continue the story, possibly to a troubling degree. Not only is his current band named after the record of his marriage’s collapse, but he has also filled out the new band with the players (Daniel Rickard on guitar/bass/organ, Jeremy Wheatley on drums) that Parker and Lily used to help flesh out The Low Lows’ comparatively richer sound. With the Low Lows, then, Noon has surrounded himself with a constant reminder of his romantic failure, a bold act of art-as-therapy that, at best, serves as a poignant living requiem for the love he could not hold together and, at worst, comes off as unhealthily obsessive wallowing.

Either way, it certainly explains the persistently gloomy tone of the band’s second album, Shining Violence. Largely in keeping with Noon’s murky sonic palette, the music on this album is forever lurching through an amorphous blur of slowcore, shoegaze, and, like a sonic tapestry woven through the favored genres of the introverted and the perpetually defeated. The result is often a record of contradictory impulses. “Sparrows” builds to a stirringly epic rock grandeur, while “Raining in Eva” and “Honey” wander around listlessly to dirge-like horn sections, unable to rouse themselves awake. “Elizabeth Pier” always seems ready to work itself into an angry frenzy, but finds Noon hiding himself behind the song’s expansive wall of noise instead. A four-song stretch of country-infused numbers in the album’s second half finds an effective use of the genre’s trademark wistful harmonicas and pedal steel wading through the band’s feedback-drenched atmosphere.

Perhaps more integral to the tone of these songs than the music, however, is the way that Noon sings them. His vocal delivery remains a distinctively inarticulate moan, a wounded-animal howl forever caught in its final, dying gasps. Often, it feels as if he is being heard at a great and borderline inaudible distance from the listener, which occasionally, when it allows a key phrase to wade its way through the haze (“Never cry mercy”, he repeats throughout much of the lovely “Tigers”), produces a haunting effect. Elsewhere, though, it can be unusually alienating; the album’s cover of the Yeah Yeah Yeah’s graceful “Modern Romance” is beautifully evocative on musical grounds, but where Karen O’s backhanded encouragement in the original (“Don’t hold on / Go, get strong / Well don’t you know / There is no modern romance”) was compelling, here the message is lost.

'Haunting' and 'alienating' may, in fact, be the best ways to describe Shining Violence as a whole, a musically accomplished and unquestionably heartfelt effort that somehow never quite lets loose the cathartic flood that it should. As a chronicle of romantic despair, it works, but the best heartbreak records nevertheless remain the ones that invite you in to wallow in their misery right along with them.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.