Reviews

Joe Cocker: Cry Me A River

Joe Cocker is the only person in this entire hour-long program who seems oblivious to the fact that he's being filmed. The fact that he won a Grammy two years later seems like a miracle.


Joe Cocker

Cry Me A River

Length: 58
MPAA rating: N/A
Label: Eagle Rock
UK Release Date: 2008-08-25
US Release Date: 2008-09-16
Artist website
Amazon
iTunes

Joe Cocker burst onto the scene in 1968 with his first record, With a Little Help From My Friends, consolidated his success with its eponymous follow-up, became a star at Woodstock, and in 1970 teamed with Leon Russell and a cast of dozens for the Mad Dogs & Englishmen tour. That tour essentially wore him out, and although he continued to have hits throughout the '70s, he never really scaled the heights of his earliest records until an unlikely duet with Jennifer Warnes. "Up Where We Belong", from the film An Officer and a Gentleman, was a massive hit, and gave Cocker a second career. But that wasn't until 1982. A lot (or a little, depending on your perspective) happened in between.

And so we find Cocker in 1980, having not put out an album in two years, performing for the German TV program Rockpalast as though he's entirely unaware of what's going on. Cocker is the only person in this entire hour-long program who seems oblivious to the fact that he's being filmed. Worse, it often seems like he couldn't care less that there's a live audience a few feet away from him. His band, to the contrary, is obviously all too aware that they're on TV, and look like a bunch of fools as a result, making agonized, exaggerated faces and never looking like they're being spontaneous or actually having fun. This role-playing has the effect of making Cocker look even more bored, and since he's supposed to be the star, this sinks the performance.

It didn't have to be this way, necessarily, as the set list is heavy on classic Cocker. But the opening "Cry Me a River", the Julie London torch song transformed into a raucous free-for-all, would never reach its Mad Dogs level of brilliant chaos. While Cocker looks awful, he doesn't sound particularly bad, just uninterested. And it's hard to blame him when you watch and listen to his five-piece band and three backing vocalists. Everything that's wrong with all of them is on clear display during the opener. The band is solidly professional and polished, but prone to rock-star posturing and very unsuited to be backing up Cocker, who needs something a bit looser and more spontaneous to work with. And the girls are just awful. They're screechy and don't mesh well. (And those outfits!)

These problems inform the entire set and especially destroy the vintage numbers like "Feelin' Alright", "Delta Lady" and "With a Little Help From My Friends", which is overly long because the players apparently think it's supposed to be. Similarly, just when you think the closing "High Time We Went" is threatening to turn into a bloated instrumental showcase, it does.

Two covers from Cocker's then-most-recent effort, 1978's Luxury You Can Afford, look great on paper and absolutely tank musically. The crowd really digs "Whiter Shade of Pale", presumably since it was a mammoth hit everywhere, but there's no sense of drama and the excitement is inexplicable. "I Heard It Through the Grapevine" has a rock-oriented arrangement that just doesn't work.

There are two performances that rise above the mediocrity. "Put Out the Light" isn't even all that special, but it's a tight performance that avoids any excess noodling and faux showmanship, and that's enough to make it a standout on this particular night. But the real highlight of Cry Me a River is "You Are So Beautiful", the extremely sentimental but quite lovely ballad sung by everyone from composer Billy Preston to Marge Simpson. Cocker's version is the most famous, and the modesty of the arrangement is a godsend here, because for a brief couple minutes he's naked and can't coast through the song. The feeling vanishes as soon as the song's over and "With a Little Help From My Friends" starts up, but it's nice while it lasts.

"Up Where We Belong" would lift Cocker to number one, a Grammy, and rejuvenated possibilities. Cry Me a River makes that seem like a miracle.

3

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image