Bishop Allen: Grrr...

Photo: Sebastian Mlynarski

On Grrr..., the band follows their "big backstory" album by stripping down their sound to make some basic but solid pop songs built on singer Justin Rice's wide-eyed charm.

Bishop Allen


Label: Dead Oceans
US Release Date: 2009-03-10
UK Release Date: Available as import

Bishop Allen's last disc, The Broken String, was their "big backstory" album. Nevermind that it was their sophomore disc after a well-received debut, or that it was to be a marquee release for the burgeoning Dead Oceans label. The album was most notably the culmination of the band's EP year. They released an EP every month for a year, and then picked out and re-recorded the best stuff for The Broken String. The resulting record was a great piece of pop music that solidified their spot as a top-tier indie band.

And now they're back with Grrr..., the follow-up to the "big backstory" album. Smartly, the band steps out of the shadow of that last album by not trying to top themselves. While Bishop Allen has always had a pretty contained sound, The Broken String had moments that soared to epic heights or chugged with a full rock-band feel. But here, on Grrr..., the band strips down their sound to make some very basic, but very solid pop songs.

Though it feels a little scaled-down, Grrr... has no shortage of catchy hooks. Much of the album, and in particular the first half, is loaded with Justin Rice's surgically infectious melodies. From the lilting verses and child-like calling on the choruses in "Dimmer" to the light noodling guitar that sneaks into "Oklahoma", Bishop Allen once again gives us a batch of songs that are so fundamentally poppy that the sound seems both distinctly theirs and oddly universal.

But what sets the band's songs apart from other pop bands is the charm of lead singer Rice. As on past albums, Grrr... succeeds most when he is being clever but not overly cute. "South China Moon" has verses sung in a wink-and-nod whisper, but the song works because the chorus Rice belts out rests on a simple but plaintive request to a lover. On "Dirt on Your New Shoes", Rice steers the songs into tumbling choruses that work not because of what he's singing, but rather how he's singing. In that moment, his slight but sweet voice takes on a surprising size that helps the song rise to more than the sum of its few parts.

Where some songs work because Rice focuses on the most basic elements, others rise to the top because of the songwriter's knack for everyday details. He illuminates shells lined up on a thread, or a note on the back of someone's hand. It lets us past the melody and clever lyrics to see the bittersweet emotions behind them. "The Ancient Common Sense of Things" is one of the best tracks on the record, because it lets Rice make a grocery list of specific and perfectly rendered details, from notes bowed on violins to a clothespin hanging on a line. Similarly, "Cue the Elephants", which subtly rises and swells to a size bigger than anything else on Grrr..., is populated by great lines like "The morning belongs to the grapefruit" that immediately put us in the song's setting. On tracks like "Oklahoma" he shows his ability to use specific lines to his advantage. The mirror image syntax of a line like, "I'm a man I insist / you insist I'm a piece of cake," not only fits the melody perfectly, but gives us a feel for the rift, however small, between these people.

As good as those moments are, sometimes Rice overplays his hand. When he sings "Olly olly oxen free" on "Dimmer" or sings a line like, "You've got eyes like Oklahoma," it feels like he's pressing. In these moments it is like he is aware of how cute he is, and he lays the charm on thick. But once you scrape that away, these lesser lines prove themselves to be nice-sounding but nonsensical.

Rice and company get it right on Grrr... far more than they get it wrong, so the album only has the occasional stumble and no big missteps. If there's a complaint about the disc, it is that sometimes the band's stripped-down approach slips into underachieving. "Tiger, Tiger" sounds a little simple to close the record, even with a slight touch of strings,. It unfortunately illuminates the album's pretty uniform middle tempo. Simplifying things is fine, of course, and Bishop Allen does quite a bit with a little on Grrr..., but there are small moments when it feels like the band is putting a glass ceiling on these songs. But while in one way Grrr... feels like a modest effort from the band, it still performs an important task for a third album: driving home the band's strengths and establishing this sound as something unequivocally theirs. And, flawed or not, it is an awful lot of fun.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.