Books

Script and Scribble by Kitty Burns Florey

“This isn’t meant to be a nostalgia trip,” Florey says. Rather, a mix of living monument to an essential human skill and a call to action.


Script and Scribble

Publisher: Melville
Subtitle: The Rise and Fall of Handwriting
Author: Kitty Burns Florey
Price: $22.95
Length: 208
Formats: Hardcover
ISBN: 781933633671
US publication date: 2009-01
Amazon

Kitty Florey may have subtitled her book The Rise and Fall of Handwriting but her intent is not to relegate handwriting to the stagnant role of relic from the past. Surely, handwriting is an art, and for many, an art that is lost. But in a recent phone interview, Florey delightedly informed me that she had sent four handwritten notes, “with stamps” in the past week. Florey's goal was not simply to write what the book jacket brightly dubs a “charming, fascinating explanation of the many facets of handwriting.” Script and Scribble is both charming and fascinating, but it's also a call to action, or rather, a call to write.

“This isn't meant be a nostalgia trip,” she confirmed. And to that end, the book baldly exposes how many people have completely unreadable handwriting. In the age of computers, most of us can get away with it. But there are still situations when we need to write “legibly and fast”. Florey draws attention to those instances in her book. For example, most doctors have terrible handwriting, yet they are frequently called upon to write, whether it is for prescriptions or on patients' medical records. The fact that their handwriting is unreadable seems dangerous and unfair.

Florey's book is certainly more informative than nostalgic, and her thoroughly researched and meticulously recounted history of handwriting is remarkably captivating. She creates an air of intrigue around the handwriting practices throughout history, and her energetic but non-aggressive tone makes us less likely to exhale a sigh for days gone by and more inclined to give a whistle of marvel and appreciation.

She begins the chapter on handwriting history with a tale of Egyptian hieroglyphs and moves us through the Romans, the invention of the quill and finally, the marvelous entrance of ballpoint pens and pencils. Then comes an engrossing and systematic analysis of the way handwriting was taught to children over the years. It comes as a surprise to learn that there were entire schools devoted to teaching handwriting; this section of American history seems more foreign than the introduction of italics in 16th Venice. Readers may be quite surprised to learn that America had a “golden age of penmanship”, but to the characters portrayed in Script and Scribble, nothing could be more important that the diligent production of letters.

We may be past the “golden age” of handwriting schools, but Florey said that in writing the book, she discovered that people do still care about handwriting, although even “they didn't know they felt strongly about it.” Florey's unassuming but contagiously inquisitive writing is perhaps largely responsible. Unlike the nuns who taught her the once ubiquitous but now outdated Palmer method, Florey is not the slightest bit didactic as she conveys her copious research. She describes various handwriting icons throughout America's history, but she is careful to note that there are quicker ways to learn handwriting.

Surely mostly of us can't imagine practicing our handwriting for hours a day, and although Florey would like see to more adults improve their handwriting, she does not think the outdated methods are practical or necessary. Having embarked on this project determined to improve her own handwriting, she found a way to do it, and now is prepared to be a handwriting evangelist of sorts. (Her current preferred font is a form of Italics.)

Before settling on that method, Florey contacted numerous modern day handwriting experts for her research and she describes her experiences with various experiences with them throughout the book. She relays her findings with a mix of childish exuberance and rigorous investigative journalism and her individual approach serves to affirm that handwriting is indeed a unique practice. A section on the art of personality reading via handwriting adds levity and spunk, though it is less essential to what is the book’s (actually rather serious) thesis: Everyone needs to learn how to write clearly.

Not only doctors, but all of us, will be called upon to use, and read, our own handwriting. Sympathy cards should not come in the form of email. She also believes that as we try to conserve energy, having computers on 24 hours a day may become a thing of the past.

Furthermore, handwriting plays an important role in terms of our thought process. She conveys, both in her book and in our conversation, that classroom note taking on lap tops is not as effective because on a computer, students do not have to think about what they are writing. Typing an entire lecture verbatim is not the same cognitive and intellectual experience as deciding which words matter, and interpreting a professor’s thoughts into one's own mind.

Kitty Burns Florey

Typing and computers, are necessary -- Florey does not deny that. She does her professional writing on her computer, but revealed, “If I come to a difficult place I have to sit down with a pen and a piece of paper to work it out.” Writing by hand forces the writer to be more thoughtful. She explains that there is “such a difference with forming a letter yourself. Creating it, messy or neat.” Computers let us be “glib”. She keeps a journal and says that it is an entirely different experience from writing on the computer, because it involves more care. She tried to keep a diary on a computer, but “it wasn’t as interesting to me.”

There is no doubt that the point of writing is to be interesting. In Script and Scribble we are invited to stoke our own passion and investment in writing, and furthermore, we are given hope that there is a better way to share it with others.

7

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image